The evidence underpinning our public challenge of Laura Bates

From the report:

“The homicide rate has consistently been higher for males than for females (Figure 2.2). In 2012/13 the homicide rate for males (13.6 per million population) was just over twice that for females (6.0 per million population) (Appendix table 2.03 (1.38 Mb Excel sheet)).
In 2012/13, around two-thirds of homicide victims were male (69%, 380 victims) and one-third were female (31%, 171 victims)”

…so overall, men are at far higher risk. Why don’t we hear people like Laura spreading this little stat around? Cherry-picking springs to mind!

And this:

“Around two-fifths (38%) of male victims aged 16 or over were killed by a friend/acquaintance in 2012/13 (similar to that found in 2011/12, 42%). In contrast, female adult victims were less likely than men to be killed by a friend/acquaintance, at 8% of homicides in 2012/13 (11 offences).
In 2012/13, just over one-third of male victims (129 males,38%) and around one in ten female victims (16 females, 11%) aged 16 and over were killed by strangers.”

…which, once again, is a stat pretty much ignored by feminists who appear only to give a shit about circumstances which specifically show women to be the victims at the hands of evil, male perpetrators. Their refusal to look beyond the female=victim/male=perpetrator stat proves that feminists don’t care about MEN who die; they only care about WOMEN who die. That, in my mind, does not promote equality.