Now you see it, now you don’t. How alcohol industry interference made marketing restrictions disappear from the 10 Year Health Plan in England.

Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) – and Substance Use Disorders in general – are men’s issues because many more men than women suffer from them. The World Health Organization (WHO) reported in 2024 that an estimated 400 million people, or 7% of the world’s population aged 15 years and older, lived with alcohol use disorders. The alcohol-attributable mortality was heaviest among men, accounting for two million deaths annually compared to 600,000 deaths among women, in 2019. The WHO report is here.

After years as a heavy drinker, I gave up alcohol in September 2025 after taking Antabuse (disulfiram), and I haven’t wanted to drink alcohol since. Antabuse is the fastest and most effective route to alcohol abstinence for problem drinkers, but for a variety of reasons is rarely prescribed by doctors presented with patients with drinking problem.

Paul Elam was a substance abuse counsellor for 30 years. He and I co-wrote the book ANTABUSE: The one-step program for alcohol abstinence. Available only through Amazon, the Kindle edition is available to order here, the paperback edition here. We recorded a video discussion about AUD and abstinence, here (video, 36:59).

I have a website dedicated to AUD, Men Stop Drinking

I recently undertook two objectives:

  • to support individual men with drinking problems, wishing to become abstinent. They need to email me in the first instance (mike@j4mb.org.uk) and I shall not charge for my time helping them.
  • to engage with individuals and organisations that should be encouraging doctors and others to prescribe Antabuse to problem drinkers. They include NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, which doesn’t currently offer guidance on AUD, and the Institute of Alcohol Studies (IAS).

The IAS produced the report Now you see it, now you don’t (how alcohol industry interference made marketing restrictions disappear from the 10 Year Health Plan in England). The full report can be downloaded from the link. From the link:

“In July 2025, the UK Government published its 10 Year Health Plan for England. Despite a media leak and subsequent Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) statement indicating that the Plan would contain alcohol marketing restrictions, these did not appear in the final document.

Alcohol industry influence has been identified as a major barrier to the introduction of effective policies to reduce alcohol harm. We were therefore keen to understand to what degree the removal of marketing restrictions from the 10 Year Health Plan might have been a result of commercial influence. To investigate further, we made freedom of information (FOI) requests to different UK Government departments for correspondence with the alcohol industry in the month ahead of the Plan’s release.

From the documents we received, we can demonstrate:

The alcohol industry targeted the Health Secretary and DHSC over potential marketing restrictions – This is a clear example of alcohol companies seeking to interfere with health policy and the NHS.

Other Government departments were leveraged to lobby DHSC on behalf of the alcohol industry – The documents we received show that alcohol companies and industry-funded organisations wrote to the Department for Business & Trade, the Department for Culture, Media & Sport and HM Treasury, encouraging them to put pressure on DHSC to drop the planned marketing restriction policy.

Alcohol industry actors likely coordinated their approach – The existence of joint letters, the timing of correspondence and striking similarities in the content of the letters all suggest a coordinated campaign.

Alcohol industry correspondence contained a range of well-known arguments and rhetorical strategies used by alcohol, tobacco, unhealthy food and drink and fossil-fuel companies, among others – These included: cherry-picking data about alcohol harm trends and the evidence base for restrictions; arguing (contrary to the evidence) that self-regulation is effective; making catastrophic economic claims; arguing that the alcohol industry is an appropriate partner in reducing harm (despite evidence that this is ineffective and even harmful); and stating (contrary to the evidence) that advertising does not increase drinking and benefits society. Specific arguments used are outlined and compared to authoritative sources of evidence and found to be misleading in our full report.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

The Gosport War Memorial Hospital 1990s opioid deaths scandal. Dr Jane Barton, 77, has been a case study in female unaccountability for 35+ years.

Dr. Harold Shipman is a well-known name to many followers of this blog. The start of his Wikipedia page:

“Harold Frederick Shipman (14 January 1946 – 13 January 2004), known to acquaintances as Fred Shipman, was an English doctor in general practice and serial killer. He is considered to be one of the most prolific serial killers in modern history, with an estimated 250 victims over roughly 30 years. On 31 January 2000, Shipman was convicted of murdering 15 patients under his care. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with a whole life order. On 13 January 2004, one day before his 58th birthday, Shipman hanged himself in his cell at HM Prison Wakefield, West Yorkshire.”

It would be fair to say that Dr Harold Shipman is a name well-known to British people in particular. Not so, that of Dr Jane Barton. She does not, seemingly, merit her own Wikipedia page.

I turn to the Gosport War Memorial Hospital 1990s opioid deaths scandal (Wikipedia link). The start of the page:

“The Gosport War Memorial Hospital 1990s opioid deaths scandal arose from the premature shortening of life of over 400 patients at Gosport War Memorial Hospital, Hampshire, England by use of opioid drugs and apparent failures by relevant authorities to detect the issue in a timely manner and for subsequent inadequate investigations into the issues.”

Later on the page:

“On 20 June 2018, after an enquiry, which took four years and cost £14 million, the Gosport Independent Panel published a report which found that 456 deaths in the 1990s had ‘followed inappropriate administration of  opioid drugs’. In his introduction, Bishop James Jones says:

“The shocking outcome of the Panel’s work is that we have now been able to conclude that the lives of over 450 patients were shortened while in the hospital … during a certain period at Gosport War Memorial Hospital, there was a disregard for human life and a culture of shortening the lives of a large number of patients by prescribing and administering ‘dangerous doses’ of a hazardous combination of medication not clinically indicated or justified … when relatives complained about the safety of patients and the appropriateness of their care, they were consistently let down by those in authority – both individuals and institutions…

If the similar cases with missing records are taken into account, the true number of victims may be up to 650. Other figures show that 70% of the victims were not admitted for terminal care, [J4MB emphasis] so their deaths were unexpected, with most living only two days or less after being administered the drug. Nurses’ concerns were repeatedly ignored.

The panel found that the hospital management, local healthcare organisations, Hampshire Constabulary, the Crown Prosecution Service, the General Medical Council, the Nursing and Midwifery Council, and local politicians had all failed to act to protect patients and their families. According to Prof Sir Brian Jarman, an expert on hospital mortality at the Dr Foster Unit at Imperial College London, the Gosport accident may be repeated because of NHS continued blame culture in pressuring or even firing whistleblowers.”

No mention is made in the Wikipedia page of Dr Jane Barton. I turn to a BBC piece from October 2024, Police identify 24 suspects over hospital drug deaths. The start of the piece:

“Detectives investigating hundreds of deaths at a hospital have identified 24 suspects.

An independent panel previously found 456 patients died after being given opiates inappropriately [J4MB: this links to a BBC piece which opens momentarily, then vanishes] at Gosport War Memorial Hospital between 1987 and 2001.

Families of those who died have been informed a new criminal investigation, led by Kent Police, has begun sharing files with the Crown Prosecution Service for charging consideration.

Operation Magenta, which follows three previous investigations by Hampshire Constabulary that resulted in no prosecutions, said 21 people were being investigated for alleged gross negligence manslaughter and three for alleged health and safety offences.”

Let us remind ourselves that 24 years have elapsed since the end of the period in which patients died after being given opioid drugs inappropriately. From the same BBC piece:

“A 2018 report into the deaths found there was a ‘disregard for human life’ of a large number of patients from 1989 to 2000.

There was an “institutionalised regime” of prescribing and administering ‘dangerous’ amounts of a medication not clinically justified at the Hampshire hospital, the report added.

Dr Jane Barton oversaw the practice of prescribing on the wards and is the only person to face disciplinary action.

She was found guilty of failings in her care of 12 patients between 1996 and 1999.

But she was not struck off the medical register, choosing to retire after the findings were published.

In a statement in 2018, Dr Barton said she was a “hard-working doctor” who was “doing her best” for patients in a “very inadequately resourced” part of the NHS.” [J4MB emphasis.]

Onto a 2018 BBC piece, Gosport hospital deaths: Who is Dr Jane Barton? Extracts:

“Doctors are meant to preserve life and cause no harm. The Hippocratic Oath, written 2,500 years ago, includes the line: ‘I will use treatments for the benefit of the ill in accordance with my ability and my judgment, but from what is to their harm and injustice I will keep them.’ A review published on Wednesday found more than 450 patients died sooner than they would have after being given powerful painkillers inappropriately at Gosport War Memorial Hospital.

Who is the doctor who actively shortened her patients’ lives?

Dr Jane Ann Barton, now aged 70, graduated from Oxford University in 1972 as a Bachelor of Medicine…

While at the hospital she was responsible for the care of people inhabiting 44 beds.

During her 12 years at the hospital, Dr Barton signed 854 death certificates. Of the patients she treated, 94% had received opiates, with ‘little evidence of the three analgesia steps recommended in palliative care: non-opiate, then weak opiate, then strong opiate’, an earlier review in 2003 found…

In some cases the aim of transfer to Gosport was for long-term care, as in patients with terminal cancer.

Others, however, were there for rehabilitation following a stroke or fractured hip.

When people die from a fracture, the cause of death should be recorded as “accidental” and accidental death is reported to a coroner.

Dr Barton, however, recorded fracture-related deaths as stemming from bronchopneumonia, meaning the coroner was not informed. Any unusually high post-fracture death rate would therefore have passed unnoticed. [J4MB emphasis. Now, why might Dr Barton have done that?]

Dr Barton stopped working at the hospital in 2000 but continued to practise as a GP…

In one set of notes Dr Barton wrote: ‘[The patient] is frightened, agitated appears in pain. Suggest transdermal analgesia despite no obvious clinical justification!! Dr Lord to countersign. I am happy for nursing staff to confirm death…’ [J4MB emphasis]

A 2010 General Medical Council investigation found Dr Barton guilty of serious professional misconduct, and of putting her patients at risk of an early death – but the panel did not remove her right to practice medicine, saying it had ‘taken into account her 10 years of safe practice as a GP‘ [J4MB: A reminder that Dr Barton graduated in 1972, 38 years before.] and 200 letters of support.

Instead, 11 conditions were placed upon Dr Barton, including a three-year ban on injecting opiates.”

Onto another BBC piece, from 2019, Gosport hospital deaths: Evidence ‘strong enough to bring charges’. Extracts:

“During the investigations, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) looked at possible charges of manslaughter and murder in relation to Dr Barton and some nurses [J4MB emphasis] who administered the drugs.

However, prosecutors decided there was not a reasonable chance of securing convictions. [J4MB emphasis. This is absolute nonsense. This simply reflects the unwillingness of the CPS to hold women – in general, and Dr Jane Barton in particular, here – accountable.]

One auxiliary nurse said: ‘It got to the stage that every time Dr Barton came to the annexe, I would think to myself who’s going to die now?’

In another statement, a staff nurse said: ‘It seemed that most patients were going on drivers even when they were not in pain.’

Another nurse said they believed the drug was used ‘to keep the waiting lists down’.”

[End of extracts.]

Long story short? Up to 650 patients – 70% of whom were not admitted for terminal care – died as a result of inappropriate use of opioid drugs at one hospital over the course of 1987-2001. All (or almost all) of the 24 people suspected of being responsible for the deaths are women. I say ‘almost all’ because maybe some of the nurses are men. Collectively they shortened the lives of far more people than Harold Shipman (estimated 250 people).

If those suspected of being responsible had been men, the investigations and trials would surely have concluded many years ago. There would also have been a huge amount of mainstream media coverage until the conclusion of the matter, as opposed to the minimal coverage of the Gosport hospital story. The latest mainstream media piece I have found was published by the BBC in November 2025, No prosecutions over more than 100 hospital deaths.

Dr Jane Barton is now 77. Will she ever be prosecuted in relation to the 650 deaths in the 1990s – when she was in her 40s – and if found guilty, incarcerated for the rest of her days? No, of course she won’t. The authorities are biding their time until she dies, never having held her to account.

Dr Jane Barton has been a case study in female unaccountability for 35+ years.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Professor Alex Edmans: “No, boardroom diversity does not mean higher profits.”

A cornerstone of initiatives aimed at persuading companies to appoint more women to their boards is the claim that by doing so, companies can expect their financial performance to improve. This laughable assertion of a business case for more women on boards conflates correlation with causation. But correlation does not imply causation.

In 2012 Mike Buchanan – on behalf of our associated website Campaign for Merit in Business – presented evidence (from numerous longitudinal studies) of a causal link between increasing gender diversity on corporate boards and financial DECLINE to House of Commons and House of Lords inquiries. The video of his oral submission to the House of Commons inquiry is here (56:50). 

We recently posted a piece with the snappy title The Diversity Project (chair: Helena Morrissey) commissions a study (leader: Professor Alex Edmans) to assess the investment impact of diversity of thought and have since researched the online output of Professor Edmans, an economist who is professor of finance at London Business School and Mercers’ School Memorial Emeritus Professor of Business at Gresham College. If you take nothing else from this blog piece, you should catch a fascinating podcast interview, Is DEI built on dodgy data? (October 2024, 58 minutes).

The biography on his website is here (is it just me, or are professors looking very young these days, like policemen?). The Policy and Practice page is here, with links to some of his articles including Is There Really A Business Case For Diversity? (Medium, 2021) and No, boardroom diversity does not mean higher profits (Telegraph, 2021) and Is diversity actually good for business? (Spectator, 2024).

Edmans is the author of May Contain Lies: How Stories, Statistics and Studies Exploit Our Biases – And What We Can Do About It. The hardback edition (£14.99) and Kindle edition (£9.99) were published last April, the paperback edition (£10.99) will be published next April.

There are plenty of video and audio files on YouTube of the good professor, here. They include Do Diverse Companies Really Perform Better? (Sacred Cows, 2024) and May Contain Lies (Stanford Graduate School of Business, 2024).

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Julie Bindel ‘worked alongside’ Keir Starmer when he was Director of Public Prosecutions, head of the Crown Prosecution Service

Yesterday (14 June, 2024) we posted a piece about some of the content of the Labour party’s election manifesto, which includes a plan to ‘fast-track’ rape cases through ‘specialist’ rape courts which will inevitably condemn even more innocent men to lengthy jail terms than at present. The stated intention is to increase the number of convictions. We expect Keir Starmer to seek to introduce juryless rape courts to deliver this, with feminist-compliant judges. Not long ago the Scottish judiciary refused the Scottish government’s demand that such courts were introduced.

Starmer was the Director of Public Prosecutions (head of the Crown Prosecution Service) over 2008-13. In an article for the Daily Mail in 2022, Julie Bindel wrote that she had ‘worked alongside’ Keir Starmer when he was the DPP. Our blog piece on the matter is here.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who reads this gives us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. You can support our work by making a donation here.

Rod Liddle RIP

Very sad news (The Telegraph, £). The start of the piece:

“Rod Liddle, the journalist and former editor of BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, has died at the age of 66.

Liddle, a columnist for The Sunday Times and The Sun, and a presenter on Times Radio, died on Sunday evening following a short illness at The James Cook University Hospital in Middlesbrough.

He was one of the highest-profile editors of the Today programme, which he ran from 1998 until 2002.

After leaving the BBC, he became a columnist for The Spectator, where he delighted in airing controversial opinions on race, immigration and feminism. [J4MB: Very rarely on feminism. The Spectator wouldn’t permit more, having been feminism-compliant for many years.] He regularly accused his former employer of Left-wing bias…”.

A BBC piece here. Of course it fails to mention any mention of Liddle’s criticism of the organisation.

The first article I always checked out when opening the online edition of The Sunday Times was Liddle’s, followed by Jeremy Clarkson’s. I shall not renew my subscription to The Times when it comes up for renewal, for a number of reasons, including its relentlessly feminism-compliant and anti-male articles and its attacks on Reform UK in general and Nigel Farage in particular. I already have online subscriptions to the The Telegraph and The Spectator, and can’t see much pointing in continuing with The Times.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Nigel Farage and Zia Yusuf lay out the Reform UK plan to stop the boats once and for all.

Interesting (video, 56:13). Nigel Farage starts at 4:35, followed by Zia Yusuf, followed by the two of them answering questions at the press conference.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

The Mansplainers, Episode #22: “The Family Court Nightmare to Exceed All Nightmares,” with Jeff Younger

Interesting (video, 1:30:48). A family court judge ordered the castration of orthodox Christian Jeff Younger’s young son at the behest of his ex-wife who was intent on transitioning the boy to a girl (“Mommy says I’m a girl.”)

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

How should women be treated by employers during the luteal phase of their menstrual cycles?

The luteal phase of the menstrual cycle lasts for 14 days of the 28-day menstrual cycle.

Our thanks to cp for pointing us to a lengthy BBC piece, What are the ‘luteal uglies’? And how they’re affecting women, inevitably written by a woman, hopefully not in her luteal phase. An extract:

“Elena, who works in hospitality and as an actress in London, says she feels lethargic and “completely unmotivated” during her luteal phase.

“I feel like my brain is working in slow motion, I tend to become clumsy and way more forgetful,” she says.”

Presumably Elena is unable to work as an “actress” during her luteal phase, because she’d forget many of her lines and stage instructions, being “way more forgetful”?”

I’m surprised the article makes no mention of the “brain fog” problem which is apparently confined to women.

So women would be unable to work as actresses during their luteal phases, but what about other professions? Would you want a female brain surgeon operating with a scalpel on your child’s brain, to be “clumsy and way more forgetful”? Clearly not.

The measure(s) to deal with the luteal phase issue would clearly have to vary by profession. Brain surgeons, pilots, politicians etc. would be forbidden from working during the phase, and their salaries cut accordingly. Women working in hospitality could have their salaries cut by 20% in recognition of their reduced productivity and annoyance caused to customers e.g. by bringing them the wrong food or drinks. Other professions would be treated on a case-by-case basis, a perfectly rational solution to this pressing problem.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

 

Playbooks, plagiarism and a pig’s head: new claims surrounding Cambridge professor Jason Arday

A piece in the Guardian. Of course the paper is presenting challenges of Professor Jason Arday as racist. An extract:

“Claudine Gay, the first black woman to become president of Harvard, was only in the post for seven months before she was forced out over plagiarism allegations.” 

No, this wasn’t about “allegations”, she was forced out because she was demonstrably a plagiarist. The Guardian is saying black people should be above criticism, what could be more racist?

A piece in yesterday’s Telegraph (£), Cambridge professor made impossible claim he was on Seven Up. An extract:

“Prof Jason Arday said he had appeared in the television series, which follows the lives of a group of people for decades from the age of seven. The inaugural episode was broadcast in 1964. He was not born until 1985.

Prof Arday is at the centre of a row about academic plagiarism after The Telegraph revealed that he has been accused of copying parts of his PhD thesis from an earlier work by another student.

He has admitted a series of errors in his work but said the “positioning of me as this kind of liar and fantasist is totally unacceptable”.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Messages 4 Men conference (2019) – John Cooper. Video #371 of 800+ videos on the J4MB YouTube channel.

Today’s video is here (15:17).

Over a period of more than two years we’re posting links to one video daily from the J4MB YouTube channel. The channel includes our media appearances since 2012, 300+ videos of talks and other materials from the International Conferences on Men’s Issues (2014 – ) and other men’s issues conferences we’ve been involved with, and so much more. The individual conference playlists are here.

Our website Campaign for Merit in Business was created in the light of the considerable evidence of a causal link between increasing gender diversity on boards and corporate financial decline. Mike Buchanan, Steve Moxon and Dr Catherine Hakim (the originator of Preference Theory) presented evidence to House of Commons and House of Lords inquiries in 2012, the video of their House of Commons evidence session is here (56:50).

Finally, we run the award-winning website Laughing at Feminists. The related comedy channel (170+ videos) is here. Remember, it’s more than important to laugh at feminists, it’s a civic duty.  

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Scientists Finally Identified What’s Killing Jaguars in the Amazon — It Wasn’t a Puma.

Our thanks to Gerry for this (video, 12:57). I saw the animal in question at Dublin Zoo a couple of weeks ago.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.