Problem drinking (Alcohol Use Disorder) is a men’s issue.

Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) – and Substance Use Disorders in general – are men’s issues because many more men than women suffer from them. The World Health Organization (WHO) reported in 2024 that an estimated 400 million people, or 7% of the world’s population aged 15 years and older, lived with alcohol use disorders. The alcohol-attributable mortality was heaviest among men, accounting for two million deaths annually compared to 600,000 deaths among women, in 2019. The WHO report is here.

I gave up alcohol in September 2025 after taking Antabuse (disulfiram), and I haven’t wanted to drink alcohol since. Antabuse is the fastest and easiest and most effective route to alcohol abstinence for problem drinkers, but for a variety of reasons is rarely prescribed by doctors to people with drinking problems.

Paul Elam was a substance abuse counsellor for 30 years. He and I co-wrote the international bestseller ANTABUSE: The one-step program for alcohol abstinence. Available only through Amazon, the Kindle edition is available to order here, the paperback edition here, the free audiobook here (1:57:47). We recorded a video discussion about AUD and abstinence, here (video, 36:59).

I have a website dedicated to AUD, Men Stop Drinking. 

I recently undertook two objectives:

  • to support individual men with drinking problems, wishing to become abstinent. They need to email me in the first instance (mike@j4mb.org.uk). I won’t charge for my time helping them.
  • to engage with individuals and organisations that should be encouraging doctors and others to prescribe Antabuse to problem drinkers. They include NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and the Institute of Alcohol Studies (IAS).

The IAS produced the report Now you see it, now you don’t (how alcohol industry interference made marketing restrictions disappear from the 10 Year Health Plan in England). The full report can be downloaded from the link. From the link:

“In July 2025, the UK Government published its 10 Year Health Plan for England. Despite a media leak and subsequent Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) statement indicating that the Plan would contain alcohol marketing restrictions, these did not appear in the final document.

Alcohol industry influence has been identified as a major barrier to the introduction of effective policies to reduce alcohol harm. We were therefore keen to understand to what degree the removal of marketing restrictions from the 10 Year Health Plan might have been a result of commercial influence. To investigate further, we made freedom of information (FOI) requests to different UK Government departments for correspondence with the alcohol industry in the month ahead of the Plan’s release.

From the documents we received, we can demonstrate:

The alcohol industry targeted the Health Secretary and DHSC over potential marketing restrictions – This is a clear example of alcohol companies seeking to interfere with health policy and the NHS.

Other Government departments were leveraged to lobby DHSC on behalf of the alcohol industry – The documents we received show that alcohol companies and industry-funded organisations wrote to the Department for Business & Trade, the Department for Culture, Media & Sport and HM Treasury, encouraging them to put pressure on DHSC to drop the planned marketing restriction policy.

Alcohol industry actors likely coordinated their approach – The existence of joint letters, the timing of correspondence and striking similarities in the content of the letters all suggest a coordinated campaign.

Alcohol industry correspondence contained a range of well-known arguments and rhetorical strategies used by alcohol, tobacco, unhealthy food and drink and fossil-fuel companies, among others – These included: cherry-picking data about alcohol harm trends and the evidence base for restrictions; arguing (contrary to the evidence) that self-regulation is effective; making catastrophic economic claims; arguing that the alcohol industry is an appropriate partner in reducing harm (despite evidence that this is ineffective and even harmful); and stating (contrary to the evidence) that advertising does not increase drinking and benefits society. Specific arguments used are outlined and compared to authoritative sources of evidence and found to be misleading in our full report.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

The Gosport War Memorial Hospital 1990s opioid deaths scandal. Dr Jane Barton, 77, has been a case study in female unaccountability for 35+ years.

Dr. Harold Shipman is a well-known name to many followers of this blog. The start of his Wikipedia page:

“Harold Frederick Shipman (14 January 1946 – 13 January 2004), known to acquaintances as Fred Shipman, was an English doctor in general practice and serial killer. He is considered to be one of the most prolific serial killers in modern history, with an estimated 250 victims over roughly 30 years. On 31 January 2000, Shipman was convicted of murdering 15 patients under his care. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with a whole life order. On 13 January 2004, one day before his 58th birthday, Shipman hanged himself in his cell at HM Prison Wakefield, West Yorkshire.”

It would be fair to say that Dr Harold Shipman is a name well-known to British people in particular. Not so, that of Dr Jane Barton. She does not, seemingly, merit her own Wikipedia page.

I turn to the Gosport War Memorial Hospital 1990s opioid deaths scandal (Wikipedia link). The start of the page:

“The Gosport War Memorial Hospital 1990s opioid deaths scandal arose from the premature shortening of life of over 400 patients at Gosport War Memorial Hospital, Hampshire, England by use of opioid drugs and apparent failures by relevant authorities to detect the issue in a timely manner and for subsequent inadequate investigations into the issues.”

Later on the page:

“On 20 June 2018, after an enquiry, which took four years and cost £14 million, the Gosport Independent Panel published a report which found that 456 deaths in the 1990s had ‘followed inappropriate administration of  opioid drugs’. In his introduction, Bishop James Jones says:

“The shocking outcome of the Panel’s work is that we have now been able to conclude that the lives of over 450 patients were shortened while in the hospital … during a certain period at Gosport War Memorial Hospital, there was a disregard for human life and a culture of shortening the lives of a large number of patients by prescribing and administering ‘dangerous doses’ of a hazardous combination of medication not clinically indicated or justified … when relatives complained about the safety of patients and the appropriateness of their care, they were consistently let down by those in authority – both individuals and institutions…

If the similar cases with missing records are taken into account, the true number of victims may be up to 650. Other figures show that 70% of the victims were not admitted for terminal care, [J4MB emphasis] so their deaths were unexpected, with most living only two days or less after being administered the drug. Nurses’ concerns were repeatedly ignored.

The panel found that the hospital management, local healthcare organisations, Hampshire Constabulary, the Crown Prosecution Service, the General Medical Council, the Nursing and Midwifery Council, and local politicians had all failed to act to protect patients and their families. According to Prof Sir Brian Jarman, an expert on hospital mortality at the Dr Foster Unit at Imperial College London, the Gosport accident may be repeated because of NHS continued blame culture in pressuring or even firing whistleblowers.”

No mention is made in the Wikipedia page of Dr Jane Barton. I turn to a BBC piece from October 2024, Police identify 24 suspects over hospital drug deaths. The start of the piece:

“Detectives investigating hundreds of deaths at a hospital have identified 24 suspects.

An independent panel previously found 456 patients died after being given opiates inappropriately [J4MB: this links to a BBC piece which opens momentarily, then vanishes] at Gosport War Memorial Hospital between 1987 and 2001.

Families of those who died have been informed a new criminal investigation, led by Kent Police, has begun sharing files with the Crown Prosecution Service for charging consideration.

Operation Magenta, which follows three previous investigations by Hampshire Constabulary that resulted in no prosecutions, said 21 people were being investigated for alleged gross negligence manslaughter and three for alleged health and safety offences.”

Let us remind ourselves that 24 years have elapsed since the end of the period in which patients died after being given opioid drugs inappropriately. From the same BBC piece:

“A 2018 report into the deaths found there was a ‘disregard for human life’ of a large number of patients from 1989 to 2000.

There was an “institutionalised regime” of prescribing and administering ‘dangerous’ amounts of a medication not clinically justified at the Hampshire hospital, the report added.

Dr Jane Barton oversaw the practice of prescribing on the wards and is the only person to face disciplinary action.

She was found guilty of failings in her care of 12 patients between 1996 and 1999.

But she was not struck off the medical register, choosing to retire after the findings were published.

In a statement in 2018, Dr Barton said she was a “hard-working doctor” who was “doing her best” for patients in a “very inadequately resourced” part of the NHS.” [J4MB emphasis.]

Onto a 2018 BBC piece, Gosport hospital deaths: Who is Dr Jane Barton? Extracts:

“Doctors are meant to preserve life and cause no harm. The Hippocratic Oath, written 2,500 years ago, includes the line: ‘I will use treatments for the benefit of the ill in accordance with my ability and my judgment, but from what is to their harm and injustice I will keep them.’ A review published on Wednesday found more than 450 patients died sooner than they would have after being given powerful painkillers inappropriately at Gosport War Memorial Hospital.

Who is the doctor who actively shortened her patients’ lives?

Dr Jane Ann Barton, now aged 70, graduated from Oxford University in 1972 as a Bachelor of Medicine…

While at the hospital she was responsible for the care of people inhabiting 44 beds.

During her 12 years at the hospital, Dr Barton signed 854 death certificates. Of the patients she treated, 94% had received opiates, with ‘little evidence of the three analgesia steps recommended in palliative care: non-opiate, then weak opiate, then strong opiate’, an earlier review in 2003 found…

In some cases the aim of transfer to Gosport was for long-term care, as in patients with terminal cancer.

Others, however, were there for rehabilitation following a stroke or fractured hip.

When people die from a fracture, the cause of death should be recorded as “accidental” and accidental death is reported to a coroner.

Dr Barton, however, recorded fracture-related deaths as stemming from bronchopneumonia, meaning the coroner was not informed. Any unusually high post-fracture death rate would therefore have passed unnoticed. [J4MB emphasis. Now, why might Dr Barton have done that?]

Dr Barton stopped working at the hospital in 2000 but continued to practise as a GP…

In one set of notes Dr Barton wrote: ‘[The patient] is frightened, agitated appears in pain. Suggest transdermal analgesia despite no obvious clinical justification!! Dr Lord to countersign. I am happy for nursing staff to confirm death…’ [J4MB emphasis]

A 2010 General Medical Council investigation found Dr Barton guilty of serious professional misconduct, and of putting her patients at risk of an early death – but the panel did not remove her right to practice medicine, saying it had ‘taken into account her 10 years of safe practice as a GP‘ [J4MB: A reminder that Dr Barton graduated in 1972, 38 years before.] and 200 letters of support.

Instead, 11 conditions were placed upon Dr Barton, including a three-year ban on injecting opiates.”

Onto another BBC piece, from 2019, Gosport hospital deaths: Evidence ‘strong enough to bring charges’. Extracts:

“During the investigations, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) looked at possible charges of manslaughter and murder in relation to Dr Barton and some nurses [J4MB emphasis] who administered the drugs.

However, prosecutors decided there was not a reasonable chance of securing convictions. [J4MB emphasis. This is absolute nonsense. This simply reflects the unwillingness of the CPS to hold women – in general, and Dr Jane Barton in particular, here – accountable.]

One auxiliary nurse said: ‘It got to the stage that every time Dr Barton came to the annexe, I would think to myself who’s going to die now?’

In another statement, a staff nurse said: ‘It seemed that most patients were going on drivers even when they were not in pain.’

Another nurse said they believed the drug was used ‘to keep the waiting lists down’.”

[End of extracts.]

Long story short? Up to 650 patients – 70% of whom were not admitted for terminal care – died as a result of inappropriate use of opioid drugs at one hospital over the course of 1987-2001. All (or almost all) of the 24 people suspected of being responsible for the deaths are women. I say ‘almost all’ because maybe some of the nurses are men. Collectively they shortened the lives of far more people than Harold Shipman (estimated 250 people).

If those suspected of being responsible had been men, the investigations and trials would surely have concluded many years ago. There would also have been a huge amount of mainstream media coverage until the conclusion of the matter, as opposed to the minimal coverage of the Gosport hospital story. The latest mainstream media piece I have found was published by the BBC in November 2025, No prosecutions over more than 100 hospital deaths.

Dr Jane Barton is now 77. Will she ever be prosecuted in relation to the 650 deaths in the 1990s – when she was in her 40s – and if found guilty, incarcerated for the rest of her days? No, of course she won’t. The authorities are biding their time until she dies, never having held her to account.

Dr Jane Barton has been a case study in female unaccountability for 35+ years.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Professor Alex Edmans: “No, boardroom diversity does not mean higher profits.”

A cornerstone of initiatives aimed at persuading companies to appoint more women to their boards is the claim that by doing so, companies can expect their financial performance to improve. This laughable assertion of a business case for more women on boards conflates correlation with causation. But correlation does not imply causation.

In 2012 Mike Buchanan – on behalf of our associated website Campaign for Merit in Business – presented evidence (from numerous longitudinal studies) of a causal link between increasing gender diversity on corporate boards and financial DECLINE to House of Commons and House of Lords inquiries. The video of his oral submission to the House of Commons inquiry is here (56:50). 

We recently posted a piece with the snappy title The Diversity Project (chair: Helena Morrissey) commissions a study (leader: Professor Alex Edmans) to assess the investment impact of diversity of thought and have since researched the online output of Professor Edmans, an economist who is professor of finance at London Business School and Mercers’ School Memorial Emeritus Professor of Business at Gresham College. If you take nothing else from this blog piece, you should catch a fascinating podcast interview, Is DEI built on dodgy data? (October 2024, 58 minutes).

The biography on his website is here (is it just me, or are professors looking very young these days, like policemen?). The Policy and Practice page is here, with links to some of his articles including Is There Really A Business Case For Diversity? (Medium, 2021) and No, boardroom diversity does not mean higher profits (Telegraph, 2021) and Is diversity actually good for business? (Spectator, 2024).

Edmans is the author of May Contain Lies: How Stories, Statistics and Studies Exploit Our Biases – And What We Can Do About It. The hardback edition (£14.99) and Kindle edition (£9.99) were published last April, the paperback edition (£10.99) will be published next April.

There are plenty of video and audio files on YouTube of the good professor, here. They include Do Diverse Companies Really Perform Better? (Sacred Cows, 2024) and May Contain Lies (Stanford Graduate School of Business, 2024).

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Julie Bindel ‘worked alongside’ Keir Starmer when he was Director of Public Prosecutions, head of the Crown Prosecution Service

Yesterday (14 June, 2024) we posted a piece about some of the content of the Labour party’s election manifesto, which includes a plan to ‘fast-track’ rape cases through ‘specialist’ rape courts which will inevitably condemn even more innocent men to lengthy jail terms than at present. The stated intention is to increase the number of convictions. We expect Keir Starmer to seek to introduce juryless rape courts to deliver this, with feminist-compliant judges. Not long ago the Scottish judiciary refused the Scottish government’s demand that such courts were introduced.

Starmer was the Director of Public Prosecutions (head of the Crown Prosecution Service) over 2008-13. In an article for the Daily Mail in 2022, Julie Bindel wrote that she had ‘worked alongside’ Keir Starmer when he was the DPP. Our blog piece on the matter is here.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who reads this gives us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. You can support our work by making a donation here.

Bridger Walker, six-year-old boy, saves younger sister from charging dog (discussion between Mike Buchanan, Elizabeth Hobson, Philipp Tanzer, Vernon Meigs, 2020). Video #431 of 800+ videos on the J4MB YouTube channel.

Today’s video is here (1:22:55).

Over a period of more than two years we’re posting links to one video daily from the J4MB YouTube channel. The channel includes our media appearances since 2012, 300+ videos of talks and other materials from the International Conferences on Men’s Issues (2014 – ) and other men’s issues conferences we’ve been involved with, and so much more. The individual conference playlists are here.

Our website Campaign for Merit in Business was created in the light of the considerable evidence of a causal link between increasing gender diversity on boards and corporate financial decline. Mike Buchanan, Steve Moxon and Dr Catherine Hakim (the originator of Preference Theory) presented evidence to House of Commons and House of Lords inquiries in 2012, the video of their House of Commons evidence session is here (56:50).

Finally, we run the award-winning website Laughing at Feminists. The related comedy channel (170+ videos) is here. Remember, it’s more than important to laugh at feminists, it’s a civic duty.  

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Men’s suicides prompt coroner’s investigation support concerns.

Our thanks to D for this. He writes:

“Good chance some of these accusations were false. I have read and heard anecdotally over the years a number of men claiming they were falsely accused of sexual offences (mainly rape) killing themselves.

Ashamedly there was a time I thought there was no such thing as a false rape accusation and maybe even worse than that, I assumed if someone accused of such a crime committed suicide it just meant they likely were guilty.

After learning more about male suicides, male neglect, LAWFARE against men in modern society, prevalence of false rape accusations and having experience of mental health in the family,  thankfully (but sadly) I am more in the picture now.

Under legislation each coroner has the power to make recommendations they think could prevent similar deaths in future (prevention of future harm recommendation) I think it is likely an underused power they have.

Also this is the first time I think I have seen it mentioned in an article which is alluding to false rape accusations,  which I think this article is doing without explicitly saying so.

I am in Cumbria myself , I was falsely accused of rape myself many years ago. I will contact this Cumbrian coroner myself about my own experience in the matter.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Julie Ann McIlwaine, 35, who killed abusive partner, has murder conviction overturned.

Our thanks to F for this. Extracts:

“At the time of his death, Crossley was on bail for an alleged [J4MB emphasis] assault against McIlwaine and subject to a restraining order prohibiting any contact with her.

Despite a period of separation, they had re-established their relationship by the night of the killing…

She described taking a knife from the kitchen, returning to the bedroom and moving the child [J4MB: the child of McIlwaine and her partner] before repeatedly stabbing her sleeping partner.

Prosecutors argued that she made rational choices which demonstrated being in control of her actions.

In October 2024, a jury rejected McIlwaine’s case and unanimously found her guilty of murder…

Two consultant forensic psychiatrists had also concluded that a properly directed jury could find McIlwaine met the criteria necessary to establish loss of self-control.”

What’s the betting the psychiatrists were feminists?

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Woman deceived ex-partner that she had given birth to his babies, judge rules.

Our thanks to D for this. Extracts:

“A woman convinced her former partner she had given birth to two children who most likely did not exist in what a High Court judge described as an “extraordinary” and “elaborate campaign of deceit”.

The man, who has not been named but was referred to as John during the hearing, applied to the Family Court after he was told the woman had sold their two children for a combined £500.

The case heard that the man received messages and photos of the children and paid the woman around £30,000 over the course of two years…

Mrs Justice Judd added she was unable to conclude the woman’s motive for her behaviour but said financial fraud was a ‘possibility’ [J4MB: No shit, Sherlock…] and that the ‘complex mental health problems’ she suffered from [J4MB: She claimed she’d been menopausal at the time of the original lies] may have also played a part.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.