The Gosport War Memorial Hospital 1990s opioid deaths scandal. Dr Jane Barton, 77, has been a case study in female unaccountability for 35+ years.

Dr. Harold Shipman is a well-known name to many followers of this blog. The start of his Wikipedia page:

“Harold Frederick Shipman (14 January 1946 – 13 January 2004), known to acquaintances as Fred Shipman, was an English doctor in general practice and serial killer. He is considered to be one of the most prolific serial killers in modern history, with an estimated 250 victims over roughly 30 years. On 31 January 2000, Shipman was convicted of murdering 15 patients under his care. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with a whole life order. On 13 January 2004, one day before his 58th birthday, Shipman hanged himself in his cell at HM Prison Wakefield, West Yorkshire.”

It would be fair to say that Dr Harold Shipman is a name well-known to British people in particular. Not so, that of Dr Jane Barton. She does not, seemingly, merit her own Wikipedia page.

I turn to the Gosport War Memorial Hospital 1990s opioid deaths scandal (Wikipedia link). The start of the page:

“The Gosport War Memorial Hospital 1990s opioid deaths scandal arose from the premature shortening of life of over 400 patients at Gosport War Memorial Hospital, Hampshire, England by use of opioid drugs and apparent failures by relevant authorities to detect the issue in a timely manner and for subsequent inadequate investigations into the issues.”

Later on the page:

“On 20 June 2018, after an enquiry, which took four years and cost £14 million, the Gosport Independent Panel published a report which found that 456 deaths in the 1990s had ‘followed inappropriate administration of  opioid drugs’. In his introduction, Bishop James Jones says:

“The shocking outcome of the Panel’s work is that we have now been able to conclude that the lives of over 450 patients were shortened while in the hospital … during a certain period at Gosport War Memorial Hospital, there was a disregard for human life and a culture of shortening the lives of a large number of patients by prescribing and administering ‘dangerous doses’ of a hazardous combination of medication not clinically indicated or justified … when relatives complained about the safety of patients and the appropriateness of their care, they were consistently let down by those in authority – both individuals and institutions…

If the similar cases with missing records are taken into account, the true number of victims may be up to 650. Other figures show that 70% of the victims were not admitted for terminal care, [J4MB emphasis] so their deaths were unexpected, with most living only two days or less after being administered the drug. Nurses’ concerns were repeatedly ignored.

The panel found that the hospital management, local healthcare organisations, Hampshire Constabulary, the Crown Prosecution Service, the General Medical Council, the Nursing and Midwifery Council, and local politicians had all failed to act to protect patients and their families. According to Prof Sir Brian Jarman, an expert on hospital mortality at the Dr Foster Unit at Imperial College London, the Gosport accident may be repeated because of NHS continued blame culture in pressuring or even firing whistleblowers.”

No mention is made in the Wikipedia page of Dr Jane Barton. I turn to a BBC piece from October 2024, Police identify 24 suspects over hospital drug deaths. The start of the piece:

“Detectives investigating hundreds of deaths at a hospital have identified 24 suspects.

An independent panel previously found 456 patients died after being given opiates inappropriately [J4MB: this links to a BBC piece which opens momentarily, then vanishes] at Gosport War Memorial Hospital between 1987 and 2001.

Families of those who died have been informed a new criminal investigation, led by Kent Police, has begun sharing files with the Crown Prosecution Service for charging consideration.

Operation Magenta, which follows three previous investigations by Hampshire Constabulary that resulted in no prosecutions, said 21 people were being investigated for alleged gross negligence manslaughter and three for alleged health and safety offences.”

Let us remind ourselves that 24 years have elapsed since the end of the period in which patients died after being given opioid drugs inappropriately. From the same BBC piece:

“A 2018 report into the deaths found there was a ‘disregard for human life’ of a large number of patients from 1989 to 2000.

There was an “institutionalised regime” of prescribing and administering ‘dangerous’ amounts of a medication not clinically justified at the Hampshire hospital, the report added.

Dr Jane Barton oversaw the practice of prescribing on the wards and is the only person to face disciplinary action.

She was found guilty of failings in her care of 12 patients between 1996 and 1999.

But she was not struck off the medical register, choosing to retire after the findings were published.

In a statement in 2018, Dr Barton said she was a “hard-working doctor” who was “doing her best” for patients in a “very inadequately resourced” part of the NHS.” [J4MB emphasis.]

Onto a 2018 BBC piece, Gosport hospital deaths: Who is Dr Jane Barton? Extracts:

“Doctors are meant to preserve life and cause no harm. The Hippocratic Oath, written 2,500 years ago, includes the line: ‘I will use treatments for the benefit of the ill in accordance with my ability and my judgment, but from what is to their harm and injustice I will keep them.’ A review published on Wednesday found more than 450 patients died sooner than they would have after being given powerful painkillers inappropriately at Gosport War Memorial Hospital.

Who is the doctor who actively shortened her patients’ lives?

Dr Jane Ann Barton, now aged 70, graduated from Oxford University in 1972 as a Bachelor of Medicine…

While at the hospital she was responsible for the care of people inhabiting 44 beds.

During her 12 years at the hospital, Dr Barton signed 854 death certificates. Of the patients she treated, 94% had received opiates, with ‘little evidence of the three analgesia steps recommended in palliative care: non-opiate, then weak opiate, then strong opiate’, an earlier review in 2003 found…

In some cases the aim of transfer to Gosport was for long-term care, as in patients with terminal cancer.

Others, however, were there for rehabilitation following a stroke or fractured hip.

When people die from a fracture, the cause of death should be recorded as “accidental” and accidental death is reported to a coroner.

Dr Barton, however, recorded fracture-related deaths as stemming from bronchopneumonia, meaning the coroner was not informed. Any unusually high post-fracture death rate would therefore have passed unnoticed. [J4MB emphasis. Now, why might Dr Barton have done that?]

Dr Barton stopped working at the hospital in 2000 but continued to practise as a GP…

In one set of notes Dr Barton wrote: ‘[The patient] is frightened, agitated appears in pain. Suggest transdermal analgesia despite no obvious clinical justification!! Dr Lord to countersign. I am happy for nursing staff to confirm death…’ [J4MB emphasis]

A 2010 General Medical Council investigation found Dr Barton guilty of serious professional misconduct, and of putting her patients at risk of an early death – but the panel did not remove her right to practice medicine, saying it had ‘taken into account her 10 years of safe practice as a GP‘ [J4MB: A reminder that Dr Barton graduated in 1972, 38 years before.] and 200 letters of support.

Instead, 11 conditions were placed upon Dr Barton, including a three-year ban on injecting opiates.”

Onto another BBC piece, from 2019, Gosport hospital deaths: Evidence ‘strong enough to bring charges’. Extracts:

“During the investigations, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) looked at possible charges of manslaughter and murder in relation to Dr Barton and some nurses [J4MB emphasis] who administered the drugs.

However, prosecutors decided there was not a reasonable chance of securing convictions. [J4MB emphasis. This is absolute nonsense. This simply reflects the unwillingness of the CPS to hold women – in general, and Dr Jane Barton in particular, here – accountable.]

One auxiliary nurse said: ‘It got to the stage that every time Dr Barton came to the annexe, I would think to myself who’s going to die now?’

In another statement, a staff nurse said: ‘It seemed that most patients were going on drivers even when they were not in pain.’

Another nurse said they believed the drug was used ‘to keep the waiting lists down’.”

[End of extracts.]

Long story short? Up to 650 patients – 70% of whom were not admitted for terminal care – died as a result of inappropriate use of opioid drugs at one hospital over the course of 1987-2001. All (or almost all) of the 24 people suspected of being responsible for the deaths are women. I say ‘almost all’ because maybe some of the nurses are men. Collectively they shortened the lives of far more people than Harold Shipman (estimated 250 people).

If those suspected of being responsible had been men, the investigations and trials would surely have concluded many years ago. There would also have been a huge amount of mainstream media coverage until the conclusion of the matter, as opposed to the minimal coverage of the Gosport hospital story. The latest mainstream media piece I have found was published by the BBC in November 2025, No prosecutions over more than 100 hospital deaths.

Dr Jane Barton is now 77. Will she ever be prosecuted in relation to the 650 deaths in the 1990s – when she was in her 40s – and if found guilty, incarcerated for the rest of her days? No, of course she won’t. The authorities are biding their time until she dies, never having been held to account.

Dr Jane Barton has been a case study in female unaccountability for 35+ years.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Professor Alex Edmans: “No, boardroom diversity does not mean higher profits.”

A cornerstone of initiatives aimed at persuading companies to appoint more women to their boards is the claim that by doing so, companies can expect their financial performance to improve. This laughable assertion of a business case for more women on boards conflates correlation with causation. But correlation does not imply causation.

In 2012 Mike Buchanan – on behalf of our associated website Campaign for Merit in Business – presented evidence (from numerous longitudinal studies) of a causal link between increasing gender diversity on corporate boards and financial DECLINE to House of Commons and House of Lords inquiries. The video of his oral submission to the House of Commons inquiry is here (56:50). 

We recently posted a piece with the snappy title The Diversity Project (chair: Helena Morrissey) commissions a study (leader: Professor Alex Edmans) to assess the investment impact of diversity of thought and have since researched the online output of Professor Edmans, an economist who is professor of finance at London Business School and Mercers’ School Memorial Emeritus Professor of Business at Gresham College. If you take nothing else from this blog piece, you should catch a fascinating podcast interview, Is DEI built on dodgy data? (October 2024, 58 minutes).

The biography on his website is here (is it just me, or are professors looking very young these days, like policemen?). The Policy and Practice page is here, with links to some of his articles including Is There Really A Business Case For Diversity? (Medium, 2021) and No, boardroom diversity does not mean higher profits (Telegraph, 2021) and Is diversity actually good for business? (Spectator, 2024).

Edmans is the author of May Contain Lies: How Stories, Statistics and Studies Exploit Our Biases – And What We Can Do About It. The hardback edition (£14.99) and Kindle edition (£9.99) were published last April, the paperback edition (£10.99) will be published next April.

There are plenty of video and audio files on YouTube of the good professor, here. They include Do Diverse Companies Really Perform Better? (Sacred Cows, 2024) and May Contain Lies (Stanford Graduate School of Business, 2024).

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Julie Bindel ‘worked alongside’ Keir Starmer when he was Director of Public Prosecutions, head of the Crown Prosecution Service

Yesterday (14 June, 2024) we posted a piece about some of the content of the Labour party’s election manifesto, which includes a plan to ‘fast-track’ rape cases through ‘specialist’ rape courts which will inevitably condemn even more innocent men to lengthy jail terms than at present. The stated intention is to increase the number of convictions. We expect Keir Starmer to seek to introduce juryless rape courts to deliver this, with feminist-compliant judges. Not long ago the Scottish judiciary refused the Scottish government’s demand that such courts were introduced.

Starmer was the Director of Public Prosecutions (head of the Crown Prosecution Service) over 2008-13. In an article for the Daily Mail in 2022, Julie Bindel wrote that she had ‘worked alongside’ Keir Starmer when he was the DPP. Our blog piece on the matter is here.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.

If everyone who reads this gives us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. You can support our work by making a donation here.

The 185 peers who supported the deciminalisation of women aborting their babies up to birth

Our thanks to John for this:

“Mike,

Here is the list of all 185 unelected Peers in the House of Lords that voted to decriminalise women aborting their babies up to birth by voting against (“Not Contents”) amendment 424 proposed by Baroness Monckton of Dallington Forest, to leave out clause 208 in the Crime and Policing Bill. They won against the 148 Peers that voted against decriminalisation of abortion up to birth. 

This is a rogue Parliament hijacked by radical feminists, as only 1% of the British population support abortion up to birth, and not representative of the people. I would suggest people email Peers to let them know how they feel about their vote.  Or send each of them a postcard with the photo of a defenseless 8 1/2 month old baby who didn’t choose their death.

Generic email: contactholmember@parliament.uk

Individual email: https://members.parliament.uk/members/Lords

[Name of Member]

House of Lords, 

London, SW1A 0PW

Peers who voted Not Contents

==========

Lord Addington (Liberal Democrat – Excepted Hereditary)

Lord Adebowale (Crossbench – Life peer)

Baroness Alexander of Cleveden (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Alli (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Andrews (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Babudu (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Bach (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Barber of Ainsdale (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Barber of Chittlehampton (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Barker (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party – Life peer)

Baroness Berger (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Bi (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Blackstone (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Bousted (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Boycott (Crossbench – Life peer)

Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Baroness Brown of Silvertown (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Bruce of Bennachie (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Baroness Bull (Crossbench – Life peer)

Baroness Caine of Kentish Town (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Carberry of Muswell Hill (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Carlile of Berriew (Crossbench – Life peer)

Lord Cashman (Non-affiliated – Life peer)

Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour – Life peer)

Viscount Chandos (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Clark of Windermere (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Lord Coaker (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Crawley (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Curran (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness D’Souza (Crossbench – Life peer)

Baroness Dacres of Lewisham (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Davidson of Glen Clova (Labour – Life peer)

Lord de Clifford (Crossbench – Excepted Hereditary)

Baroness Debbonaire (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Deech (Crossbench – Life peer)

Lord Dixon of Jericho (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Baroness Donaghy (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Doocey (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Baroness Drake (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Dubs (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Duvall (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Eatwell (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Elliott of Whitburn Bay (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Evans of Sealand (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Forbes of Newcastle (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated – Life peer)

Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Baroness Freeman of Steventon (Crossbench – Life peer)

Baroness Gerada (Crossbench – Life peer)

Baroness Gill (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Goddard of Stockport (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Baroness Gohir (Crossbench – Life peer)

Baroness Goudie (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Grender (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Baroness Griffin of Princethorpe (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Hain (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench – Life peer)

Lord Hannett of Everton (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour – Life peer)

Viscount Hanworth (Labour – Excepted Hereditary)

Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Conservative – Life peer)

Baroness Harman (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Hayman (Crossbench – Life peer)

Baroness Hazarika (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Healy of Primrose Hill (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Helic (Conservative – Life peer)

Lord Hendy (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Hermer (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Hodge of Barking (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Humphreys (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green (Crossbench – Life peer)

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Hunter of Auchenreoch (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Hussein-Ece (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Baroness Hyde of Bemerton (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Janke (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Lord John of Southwark (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party – Life peer)

Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Katz (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Keeley (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Kidron (Crossbench – Life peer)

Baroness Kingsmill (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Kinnock (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Baroness Leaman (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Lord Leong (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Levitt (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Liddle (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Macdonald of River Glaven (Crossbench – Life peer)

Baroness MacLeod of Camusdarach (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Macpherson of Earl’s Court (Crossbench – Life peer)

Baroness Mallalieu (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Mann (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Martin of Brockley (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Mattinson (Labour – Life peer)

Lord McCabe (Labour – Life peer)

Lord McNicol of West Kilbride (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Merron (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Lord Mitchell (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Mohammed of Tinsley (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Lord Moraes (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Morris of Yardley (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Mott (Conservative – Life peer)

Lord Nagaraju (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Nargund (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Neate (Crossbench – Life peer)

Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Baroness O’Grady of Upper Holloway (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Lord Paddick (Non-affiliated – Life peer)

Lord Pannick (Crossbench – Life peer)

Lord Patel (Crossbench – Life peer)

Baroness Paul of Shepherd’s Bush (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Penn (Conservative – Life peer)

Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Lord Pitkeathley of Camden Town (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Pitkeathley (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Prentis of Leeds (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Primarolo (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Rafferty (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Ramsey of Wall Heath (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Rebuck (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Redesdale (Non-affiliated – Life peer)

Lord Rees of Easton (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Rennard (Non-affiliated – Life peer)

Lord Robertson of Port Ellen (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Roe of West Wickham (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Rooker (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour – Life peer)

Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat – Excepted Hereditary)

Lord Sahota (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Baroness Shah (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative – Life peer)

Baroness Sheehan (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Baroness Smith of Cluny (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Smith of Finsbury (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Smith of Llanfaes (Plaid Cymru – Life peer)

Viscount Stansgate (Labour – Excepted Hereditary)

Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Baroness Sugg (Conservative – Life peer)

Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Thomas of Winchester (Liberal Democrat – Life peer)

Baroness Thornton (Labour – Life peer)

Viscount Thurso (Liberal Democrat – Excepted Hereditary)

Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Twycross (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Vallance of Balham (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Walker of Broxton (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Warwick of Undercliffe (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Watkins of Tavistock (Crossbench – Life peer)

Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Watson of Wyre Forest (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Watts (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Wheeler (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Whitehead (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Winston (Labour – Life peer)

Baroness Winterton of Doncaster (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Wood of Anfield (Labour – Life peer)

Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative – Life peer)

Baroness Young of Old Scone (Non-affiliated – Life peer)”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

BBC’s ludicrous defence of its self-serving complaints system

An interesting piece by David Keighley for TCW. An extract:

“A BBC spokesman quoted in a Daily Telegraph article about the News-watch survey said: ‘The BBC has one of the most open and comprehensive systems for handling complaints in the UK media, regulated by a fully independent regulator in Ofcom, which in its most recent major research project found very high levels of satisfaction in our system. The vast majority of complaints are addressed and resolved at Stage 1 of the process, with only a small portion progressing to the Executive Complaints Unit for further consideration, so no meaningful comparison can be drawn from outcomes between the two stages. The ECU uphold complaints where they consider there to have been a breach of editorial standards.’

Both strands of that defence are disingenuous, outrageous tosh.”

In 2014 – 12 years ago – we published Our first official complaint to the BBC – a Newsnight episode on domestic abuse/violence breaches 50+ BBC Editorial Guidelines. Our complaint was rejected without explanation, our appeal likewise. We haven’t wasted our time submitting a formal complaint to the BBC since.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Mike Buchanan debates MGM with Rabbi Jonathan Romain, BBC 3 Counties Radio (2018). File #236 of 800+ files on the J4MB YouTube channel.

Today’s file is here (19:03).

Over a period of more than two years we’re posting links to one video daily from the J4MB YouTube channel. The channel includes our media appearances since 2012, 300+ videos of talks and other materials from the International Conferences on Men’s Issues (2014 – ) and other men’s issues conferences we’ve been involved with, and so much more. The individual conference playlists are here.

Our website Campaign for Merit in Business was created in the light of the considerable evidence of a causal link between increasing gender diversity on boards and corporate financial decline. Mike Buchanan, Steve Moxon and Dr Catherine Hakim (the originator of Preference Theory) presented evidence to House of Commons and House of Lords inquiries in 2012, the video of their House of Commons evidence session is here (56:50).

Finally, we run the award-winning website Laughing at Feminists. The related comedy channel (170+ videos) is here. Remember, it’s more than important to laugh at feminists, it’s a civic duty.  

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Islamic charity: ‘Mandatory for wives to do housework and serve’

Our thanks to Nigel for this. He writes:

“MGM just one of the areas where religion and culture collide with modern society. Unsurprising teaching in a Mosque from an Imam. Though I note that the NSS leaves out the bit, reported elsewhere, where he says Husbands are to work and support the wives and family specially female relatives. I suppose the entertaining part is the clash between “multiculturalism” and at the same time insisting adherence to an orthodoxy. One of which is although women have free choice to do as they will, it is still the husband’s responsibility to work and earn money to support the whole family, even if he’s kicked out of his home and excluded from seeing his children. So orthodox an idea that I suspect no one will object to the Koran’s teachings that men should be husbands and lead their family by supporting it through working hard.

The cheeky part of me wonders if the latest Green MP, a declared feminist and admirer of the “strong women” of the feminist movements. Has seen this and reflects on the “Muslim” block vote that put her there. Will there come a time when the price of that vole will be more than spouting slogans about Gaza? For instance Jess Phillip’s tarnished halo as it become evident, to the women themselves, that her crusade for “women and girls” doesn’t extend to those victimised by Grooming Gangs…. just in case the Muslim vote gets the extra few hundred votes that will lose her her seat. Turns out “multiculturalism” works in complex ways.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

The Jerusalem Post: “Infant hospitalized with severe herpes infection after circumcision involving direct oral suction.”

Appalling. An extract:

“The use of direct oral suction during circumcision has been the subject of medical and halachic (Jewish legal) debate for years. The Health Ministry has repeatedly warned against the practice and instructed mohels to use a glass tube or designated sterile device to avoid direct contact between the mohel’s mouth and the infant.

At the same time, the Interministerial Oversight Committee of Mohalim has stressed that mohels are required to inform parents of the risks associated with direct oral suction and obtain their explicit consent. Still, in some communities, the practice appears to continue despite the known dangers, sometimes without parents fully understanding the possible health consequences.

In 2012, the issue made international headlines after health authorities in New York documented a series of confirmed neonatal herpes cases linked to ritual circumcisions involving direct oral suction. In Israel, Schneider Children’s Medical Center also publicized similar cases, including two infants hospitalized in 2016 after contracting herpes in the circumcision area.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Allison Pearson: “Britain is about to make a sickening change to the abortion law.”

A deeply moving piece in yesterday’s Telegraph. The start:

“I want to scream. We know that this far-Left Government, led by a strange, soulless prime minister would struggle to find a moral compass in a Sainsbury’s home geometry set. Until now, though, we may have clung to the hope that even Labour would draw the line at evil. Apparently not. If the test of a civilisation is how it treats its most helpless members then tomorrow evening [J4MB: This evening] we will find out whether Britain can still call itself civilised; or is this a country where bats enjoy more protection than babies?

The House of Lords will vote on Clause 208 of the Crime and Policing Bill which, if passed into law, means it would no longer be an offence for a woman to induce her own abortion at any stage of pregnancy for any reason (including not wanting a baby girl) and right up to birth.” 

The legislative change is expected to pass. Another extension of women’s unaccountability, to the “right” to kill unborn babies which are perfectly viable.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Speakers’ Corner, London – campaigning against MGM (2018). Video #235 of 800+ videos on the J4MB YouTube channel.

Today’s video is here (13:43).

Over a period of more than two years we’re posting links to one video daily from the J4MB YouTube channel. The channel includes our media appearances since 2012, 300+ videos of talks and other materials from the International Conferences on Men’s Issues (2014 – ) and other men’s issues conferences we’ve been involved with, and so much more. The individual conference playlists are here.

Our website Campaign for Merit in Business was created in the light of the considerable evidence of a causal link between increasing gender diversity on boards and corporate financial decline. Mike Buchanan, Steve Moxon and Dr Catherine Hakim (the originator of Preference Theory) presented evidence to House of Commons and House of Lords inquiries in 2012, the video of their House of Commons evidence session is here (56:50).

Finally, we run the award-winning website Laughing at Feminists. The related comedy channel (170+ videos) is here. Remember, it’s more than important to laugh at feminists, it’s a civic duty.  

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.