DC Kirsty Anderson, 39, domestic violence officer, faces jail for stalking her ex-boyfriend and threatening to petrol bomb his new partners’ home while her daughter was asleep

Our thanks to Mike P for this. The start and end of the piece:

A woman police officer subjected her ex to a menacing six-month stalking campaign after he dumped her and took up with a new lover.

Detective Constable Kirsty Anderson – who worked in a domestic violence unit – used her own police force’s computer to threaten Michael Hall, 36, and his new partner, telling them: ‘Life will be hell.’

The jealous detective, 39, even told Mr Hall to watch his two sons who ‘could disappear’.

She also threatened to spread untrue rumours Mr Hall’s new girlfriend Sarah Stroud, 37, was HIV positive and said she would petrol bomb Miss Stroud’s home while her daughter, aged five, slept. [J4MB emphases]

Now the West Yorkshire police officer is facing jail after pleading guilty at Bradford Crown Court to harassing Mr Hall, leaving him in fear of violence.

She also admitted using police computers to access data which she was not authorised to view.

Anderson – who had dated Mr Hall for eight weeks [J4MB emphasis] after meeting via Tinder – began her campaign when he dumped her, sending him a series of emails warning ‘Ur life will be hell’ and ‘U will live a nightmare’…

The court heard Anderson – who has resigned from the force – had a ‘raft of mental health problems’. [J4MB: Clearly well suited to working in a domestic violence unit, then.]

She is due to be sentenced on January 26. [J4MB: A woman with a ‘raft of mental health problems’. Is there the remotest chance of a suspended sentence?]

13 thoughts on “DC Kirsty Anderson, 39, domestic violence officer, faces jail for stalking her ex-boyfriend and threatening to petrol bomb his new partners’ home while her daughter was asleep

  1. Now the West Yorkshire police officer is facing jail … ‘

    Gruff’s cynical ‘outcome prediction forecast’: she’ll cross ‘the custody threshold’ however, jailing her will not be in the public interest, and anyway she was of previously good character, was under stress following the break up of the relationship and had been drinking heavily, so in this instance a slap on the wrist suspended for six months is most appropriate. BUT, if she’s ever so naughty again the judge will give her a very stern dressing down and say some things that might make her cry.

    Like

    • I predict she’ll be sobbing throughout the trial. I believe this is obligatory for female criminals, and a mitigating factor when it comes to sentencing.

      Like

      • Then the wanker in the wig will just let it walk out of court with barely a slap on the wrist. Once these rotten women start blabbering, these poncy poofs go weak at the knees and have to start wiping the tear from the corner of their eyes. They see a girlie hurting and are compelled to come a riding in on their white horse to save her.

        I just want to vomit right now!

        It is just so sickening to watch how these disgustingly pathetic “male human beings” (I refuse to call them men) will never punish a criminal woman when it is just and right to do so. They just let her walk after making up some utterly insulting and pathetic excuse or reason why they shouldn’t send them to prison.

        All these lowlife beta male judges should all be charged with some crime. Prosecuted then locked up for a decade or three, for all the lives they have destroyed by allowing these criminal women to walk free, but worse still, giving them back their children after they had committed all manner of abuses, including murder.

        Forget about men rising up to stop this. When the hell are we ever going to see any number of women rising up to stop all this evil that is perpetrated by a large portion of the female population and enabled by a substantial portion of the male population?

        Like

    • You are probably right William but I think she made a big mistake in targeting the new girlfriend and daughter. Its one thing to try to make a man’s life a misery but to involve a woman and child takes to a whole new level. ( after all the law is there to protect women and children)It will be interesting to see the outcome.

      Like

      • Yes it will be interesting. I’d still put money on a light sentence. In completely reverse to a male police officer who’d attract an even harsher sentence precisely because he’d been in a position of power as a Police Officer.

        Like

      • A male police officer would get at least two years, and probably five (the misuse of the police computer and death threats alone would guarantee a custodial sentence – every judge would just see the headlines from the Guardian and the shriek from Woman’s Aid in these kinds of cases, and why put your reputation and career on the line to protect a self confessed scumbag?).

        Like

  2. This whole story cannot be true. It must be fake news. Women don’t do things like that. Only men behave in that sort of way. Women are made of sugar & spice and all things nice.

    As for threatening children, isn’t it only men that are renown for that.

    And the other thing is, if this were true, it’d be splashed all across the BBC. After all, they are the ultimate organ of truth and light.

    Jess Phillips is against gender violence; she would have surely spoken out.

    No … this cannot be true.

    Glenn.

    Like

  3. What was a woman with “a raft of mental health problems” doing in the police in the first place?

    Surely, it couldn’t be anything to do with meeting some sort of quota figures at all, by any slim chance could it?

    Like

    • What was a woman with “a raft of mental health problems” doing in the police in the first place?

      The answer is twofold:

      1) Achieving her potential.

      2) Anything a man can do, and better, with much more sensitivity and empathy.

      Like

  4. Frankly this woman is unlucky that her case got as far as it did within our feminised justice system. Statistically, cases against female stalkers are under-reported and under-prosecuted. I am calling it as a six month sentence, suspended for two years. After all, like the majority of men in jail, she has mental health problems, so doubtless our judge will seize the excuse to spare her from prison…

    Like

  5. This nutcase shouldn’t have been within 1000 miles of working for the Police…..but it happened.
    Incredibly,we now have females working in public services who can’t make a single handed arrest of a suspect,who can’t use a pressurised fire hose on a ladder and can’t be hand-cuffed to a male prisoner in a court of law-all for fear of the outcomes.

    Like

Leave a comment