The Conservative politicians (including Dave) who recently awarded honours to the lying feminists Laura Bates (BEM) and Caroline Criado-Perez (OBE) should be utterly ashamed of themselves. Even after receiving their honours lying feminists keep on lying, given platforms by the mainstream media, most notably the BBC and rags such as the Guardian, New Statesman, Independent, Observer…

Our thanks to John for this, published by the Guardian five days ago. Among the trademark hysterical nonsense spouted by Special Snowflake (gender pay gap, female CEOs, female MPs, wah! wah! wah!…) are the lies for which she won two Lying Feminist of the Month awards in the space of just three months last year:

– #6, women raped in the UK (November 2014)
– #8, women killed in the UK by current or former partners (September 2014).

A link to all the award winners is here.

Laura Bates and other whiny women like her – Charlotte Proudman comes inevitably to mind – should carry one of these in their handbags. A link to all our Whiny Feminist of the Month award winners is here. Special Snowflake has won the award two or three times, and was the inaugural member of The Whine Club.

This video (4:05) by Paul Joseph Watson has attracted over 94,000 views in the past four days.

Priceless. The start of the article:

A campaign has called for an outright ban on robots developed for sex. Leading academics in robot ethics have warned that their creation will only increase the objectification of women and children, further dehumanising those who are abused for sex.

The warning comes as artificial intelligence approaches a point where it could be used in robots designed solely to satisfy sexual desires. But such robots, campaigners argue, should not exist.

“The development of sex robots and the ideas to support their production show the immense horrors still present in the world of prostitution,” read a statement on the Campaign Against Sex Robots website. The authors of the campaign argued that sex robots would further increase the perceived “inferiority of women and children” and continue to justify their use as “sex objects”.

The campaign, led by Kathleen Richardson, a senior research fellow in the ethics of robotics at De Montfort University in Leicester and Erik Brilling, an associate senior lecturer in informatics from the University of Skövde in Sweden, hopes to encourage a wider debate around the development of sex robots and their potential implications for society.

Hmm – ‘potential implications for society’? Or ‘potential implications for women’, specifically? With research towards artificial wombs coming along nicely, life’s going to become ever more challenging for those of the female persuasion. An increasing number of men – MGTOWs – are already walking off the plantation. What will women offer men, in a bid to return them to their former servitude? Scintillating conversation, perhaps?

Along with other followers of this blog you probably enjoy nuanced and sophisticated perspectives on gender issues, so I feel confident you’ll enjoy this. In a similar vein, the associated video (2:37) is a gem. Enjoy.

Good points, well made.

Another excellent piece from Kathy Gyngell.

Among the privileged former alumni of St Paul’s Girl’s School – ‘Paulinas’ – is a notably odious female Labour MP, Mrs Dromey. Some pieces about her, published by The Daily Mash, are here. Among my favourite titles are ‘Women Still Face Discrimination, Says Jumped-Up Cow’ and ‘Labour MPs To Rally Behind Unbearable, Screeching Hag’.

Good news.

Our thanks to Rob for this. You have to ask, how many men will be so utterly desperate for female company, as to use a feminist dating app? And if those poor souls do get a date, who might it be with? Liar Bates? Charlatan Proudman? Caroline Cryado-Perez? The mind boggles… still, we can be sure they’d pay 50% of the bills. To do otherwise would be to accept benevolent sexism, after all.

A few hours ago the Spectator published a piece by Isabel Hardman, about Jeremy Corbyn’s shadow cabinet appointments. At that moment in time 16 women had been appointed, and 13 men. Did that stop feminists whining? Of course not. Jezza hasn’t given ‘enough’ of the senior ministerial positions to people with the ‘right’ genital equipment.

No news, yet, on whether a statistically representative number of new shadow cabinet ministers are from Lincolnshire, are one-legged, have speech impediments, suffer from rheumatism, or belong to the Barry Manilow Appreciation Society. Shocking, really, when you think about it.

Corbyn has created posts out of thin air, in order to give women whackadoodle ministerial positions and thereby create numerical ‘equality’. Gloria De Piero won two of our Lying Feminist of the Month awards, here and here. She now exults in the formerly non-existent job title of, ‘Shadow minister for young people and voter registration’, so she will be ‘shadowing’ nobody. Women everywhere will surely stand a little taller from now on.

An excellent review. JB kindly includes a link to a piece written about me by a cub reporter at the Mirror. I was interviewed by him in January, at the paper’s impressive offices in Canary Wharf. He’d said before I’d agree to meet him, that his organization would reimburse my travel costs, but despite a number of requests, it never did.