I hope you have all joined the thinkspot waitlist. Remember if you use this link you will be able to jump the queue and gain earlier entry. All the 250,000 people on the waitlist will be given entry over the next few months.
My thinkspot page is finally live and I’ve just started to get involved in discussions with readers. In case you were wondering, it is free to join and view all the material being posted by contributors, but you pay minimum yearly payments to be able to join the discussion forums, receive additional newsletters or join the video Q&As.
My first thinkspot video
I have an interesting and alarming news story for my first video made for thinkspot – a perfect example of why I am out there advocating for a fairer world for men and boys.
I’ve long been contacted by parents and teachers concerned about anti-male bias in school curriculums – I’ve made a previous video with an Australian teacher about this issue.
So, I was really delighted to be contacted by a South Australian teacher, Christopher Vogel, who told me he’d just finished his Masters thesis showing his state’s school curriculum is systematically teaching children that males are the abusers with females as their innocent victims.
Christopher analyzed Keeping Safe, the mandatory child protection curriculum taught in all public schools in SA from kindergarten to year 12.
He talks to me about his fascinating results in my new video. Here’s the link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPfhASOano8. I hope you will help me promote this important research. We need to expose this education department for teaching girls to fear boys.
His research reveals systemic bias against boys. The curriculum provides 84 examples of males being aggressive to females (including child rape and abuse) and only one instance of a female being aggressive to a male (looking in his room without permission). See examples in the graphic below.
The introduction to the curriculum reveals the clear bias against boys, quoting from feminist advocacy groups like White Ribbon which are known to distort violence statistics, presenting only males as aggressors. Here’s a breakdown of the proportion of male to female aggressors in the introduction. The bias against boys increases with the older age groups, as you can see here.
It wasn’t so long ago that our society realised, to our shame, that we’d failed victims of sexual abuse by choosing not to hear their stories. But now we have an entire school curriculum which deliberately ignores male victims of abuse, denying their experiences and making them reluctant to seek help. In Australia we have recently had hundreds of victims of child sexual abuse paraded in the media, as part of the Royal Commission into institutional sexual abuse. It was startling how many of these were boys.
It’s just one example of the dangerous grip of feminist ideology on our institutions, including school curriculum. South Australia certainly isn’t the only state where this is happening. I hope this inspires parents and teachers to check out whether children in your schools are being fed similarly dangerous nonsense. I’ll post Christopher’s thesis on my website to give the detailed information you might need to ask tough questions. You’ll be pleased to hear Kit received an HD for his thesis and was asked to present his results to senior education bureaucrats. We need to be writing to education ministers across the country seeking more balanced treatment of our children.
Here are some of the curriculum’s examples of male aggression:
[J4MB: Sorry, the grapjhic hasn’t loaded.]
First law case challenging adjudication of rape on campus
I was thrilled to see today that lawyers in Brisbane are challenging the right of the University of Queensland to hear allegations of sexual assault. Wendy Mulcahy from Mulcahy Ryan Lawyers is representing a medical student accused of inappropriate sexual behaviour by another student. The University is bullying the student seeking that he attend a disciplinary board hearing about the allegation. Mulcahy has filed proceedings in the Supreme Court arguing that the university “does not have jurisdiction to hear and make findings about such matters. “
Hear, hear. This is an extremely important case. Finally, a university will be forced to publicly address the question of whether it is appropriate for such an institution to get involved in deciding criminal matters.
The hearing is on October 11. I will keep you posted.
Please spread the word that students should get in touch with me if they find themselves being investigated for sexual assault by university committees. I’m sure we can find lawyers to help young men in this circumstance. We must challenge these inappropriate, arguably illegal kangaroo courts.
White Ribbon goes under
Hurrah! White Ribbon is going into liquidation. This ghastly organisation, which has long been spreading anti-male bile in workplaces and schools, was suspected to be cooking the books and is now going under. It’s celebration time!
That’s it for now. Cheers, Tina
Our last general election manifesto is here.
Our YouTube channel is here.
If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.