Judges say they will ignore pre-nups unless couple are rich: Warning that majority of agreements are a waste of time and courts will instead base decisions on ‘fairness’

Our thanks to Jeff for this. The ‘fairness’ on which decisions will be based will invariably favour wives over husbands, whether or not the couples have children, and whether or not wives have made a material contribution to the couples’ financial assets.

Men who might be tempted to marry should at least visit our associated website, Men Shouldn’t Marry.

2 thoughts on “Judges say they will ignore pre-nups unless couple are rich: Warning that majority of agreements are a waste of time and courts will instead base decisions on ‘fairness’

  1. I believe in many European countries the marital assets are only those built up during the marriage. Hence the UK is divorce central for Eurpean gold diggers wealthy

  2. Here’s the irony – “whether or not wives have made a material contribution to the couples’ financial assets”. She stayed home or worked part time? Then she needs alimony (and child support) because her future earnings are less! She had a job that paid as much or more than the husband? Then those assets are half or more hers! Give her more support to even things out!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.