Our thanks to Craig for this. From the article:
Full sexual risk orders last for a minimum of two years and breaching an order can lead to a prison sentence of up to five years.
They are used when someone has not been convicted of a sexual offence, but the police convince a court it is necessary for one to be made against the person to protect the public from him or her.
‘ … it is necessary for one to be made against the person to protect the public from him or her.‘
Or her? How likely is that in the present legal climate?