In the wake of our last blog piece, about a non-hormonal contraceptive injection for men being less than three years away, our thanks to John Galt for this. You now know where your next charitable donation should go – here.

Our thanks to J for some good news for men seeking to avoid becoming fathers against their will and/or to protect themselves against both forms of paternity fraud:

1. A woman seeking to persuade him he’s the biological father of a child, or letting him continue with the delusion that he is – e.g. because he’s the woman’s husband, that kind of old-fashioned assumption. Both have been a crime in the UK for many years, but not one woman has ever been convicted of the offence; and

2. A woman sabotaging contraceptive methods, e.g. ‘forgetting’ to take the contraceptive pill.

An interesting new piece from Glen Poole at InsideMAN. We thank him for linking to our public challenge of Eleri Butler, Chief Executive of Welsh Women’s Aid, relating to lies in her organisation’s submission to the Welsh government. It’s good to see recognition given to Tony Stott of Healing Men, he’s been doing some excellent work challenging the Welsh government to take proper account of the needs of male victims of domestic violence.

Our thanks to M for pointing us to this tragic story. Samantha Adeokun, 41, an alcoholic cannabis-smoking ex-prostitute with personality issues and previous convictions for violence, who left school at 13, beat her 41-year-old musician boyfriend to death by striking him ‘hundreds of times’ with a guitar stand. She was described as the ‘dominant person in the relationship’, and Peter Davegun – who also drank and smoked cannabis – weighed just seven-and-a-half stone.

The article is worth reading in full, but I’d like to draw attention to one remark:

The judge said the murder was aggravated by Mr Davegun’s slight build…

The judge was a man. Has any male judge ever said the murder of a female partner was aggravated by her slight build? We doubt it. The whole of the judiciary seems relentlessly unaware of something that experts in the field of intimate partner violence have understood for a very long time, and our link to 300+ studies confirming the matter is here. It is this:

Women are as physically aggressive towards intimate partners as men, or more aggressive.

The increasing corruption of Wikipedia by bullying gender ideologues is a matter for concern. The latest story on the issue is here.

Robert Franklin game a wonderful talk in Detroit. I could listen to someone with his Deep South accent talk for an hour about different varieties of rhubarb, but the content of his speech – it’s here with a full transcript – was excellent.

I’ve just enjoyed reading a new piece written by Robert, just published by AVfM, about the ‘Extreme Heat Rule’ which is available only to female tennis players – you know, the ones who play far fewer games than the male players – at the US Open Tennis Championships, currently being held in New York. As with a number of other major tennis championships – including Wimbledon – the women get the same prize money. And now they’re not expected to play when it’s… er… hot. Seriously, you have to ask yourself:

Are normal women – feminists are excluded, by definition – not mortified by this kind of thing?

A typically insightful, punchy, and well-researched new piece from Janet Bloomfield AKA ‘JudgyBitch’.

[Note added 4.10.14: A link to the government statistics which prove that Laura Bates’s claim was a lie is here.]

Earlier this evening I read a very interesting article on domestic homicide by Herbert Purdy, by any standards a ‘must read’ blogger. If you haven’t already subscribed to his blog we recommend you do so now. At the start of the article he links to a video clip from a presentation given in December 2013 by Laura Bates, in the course of which she stated:

Over two women a week are killed by their partner of former partner.

With total justification, Mr Purdy writes:

When Ms Bates so simperingly complains that ‘Over two women a week are being killed by their male partners’ etc., she is lying: nakedly, baldly, and culpably.

In a moment I’ll send a link to this blog piece to Laura Bates, inviting her to email me and retract her lie. She’s a strong contender for our ‘Feminist Liar of the Month’ award, at which point she’ll become – with Caroline Criado-Perez – the only winner of both that award and our ‘Whiny Feminist of the Month’ award.

In a couple of recent posts we’ve provided links to a quite remarkable document – lengthy, too, at 73 pages, clearly the result of a huge amount of work – Partner Violence Against Men in England & Wales, and the Gender Bias of Public Bodies. It’s more than worthy of a blog piece in its own right, and in addition to this piece we’ll be adding it to our ‘menu’. The report is here, and it was produced by the person, or people, behind Red Pill UK. We speak of people taking the ‘red pill’ when they decide to investigate how the world really works with respect to gender issues, as opposed to how feminists say it works. As the old saying goes:

How do you know a feminist is lying? Her lips move.

Another day, another public challenge. Welsh Women’s Aid recently submitted a document to the Welsh government. As we’d expect, the document is riddled with radical feminist thinking. In this letter we’re challenging Eleri Butler, Chief Executive of WWA, to retract two lies in their submission, and to update two obsolete statistics on their website. We’re also sending our letter to AMs (the Welsh equivalent of MPs) on the committee concerned, along with all other AMs in the Welsh Assembly.