An interesting video (15:20) published a week ago. It is projected that by 2050 indigenous British white people will represent a minority of the population in the UK (that point was reached many years ago in London). The most popular comment (after a pinned one):

“It would be called ethnic cleansing in most other countries.”

The full GB News interview (1:18:56) from which the video above was extracted is titled ‘It’s concerning’ Douglas Murray on the decline of the white British.

Murray’s latest book On Democracies and Death Cults: Israel and the Future of Civilization was published last month. The Amazon description takes up the remainder of this blog piece:

“In his travels through Israel and Gaza, #1 International Bestselling author Douglas Murray has seen the best and the worst humanity has to offer, and he has no trouble choosing a side.

Murray is not Jewish and before October 7, he had never lived in Israel. However, he objects to being lied to, and Israel has been on the receiving end of the biggest, deepest, longest lies in history. 

Israel’s commitment to fundamental Western values—capitalism, individual rights, democracy, and reason—has made it a beacon of progress in a region dominated by authoritarianism and extremism. Israel’s principles vividly contrast with the ideology of Hamas, which openly proclaims its love of death over life. With incisive moral clarity, On Democracies and Death Cults exposes how the campus left and international establishment confuse this conflict by:

• Calling on Israel for restraint and proportionality, while Hamas commits genocide.
• Slandering Israelis as white colonialists, while only a third of Israelis are Jews of European ancestry.
• Framing the conflict as oppressor vs. oppressed, when it is really between a thriving multi-ethnic democracy and a death cult bent on its annihilation. 

Drawing from intensive on-the-ground reporting in Israel, Gaza, and Lebanon, Douglas Murray places the latest violence in its proper historical context. He takes readers on a harrowing journey through the aftermath of the October 7 massacre, piecing together the exclusive accounts from victims, survivors, and even the terrorists responsible for the atrocities. If left unchecked, misplaced sympathy could embolden forces that seek to undermine not only Israel, but all of Western civilization.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Good news and more good news.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Laura Bates, 38, should need no introduction to followers of this blog. She founded the Everyday Sexism Project (the Everyday Whining Project) in 2012. She won our Lying Feminist of the Month award twice in the space of a few months. She lied to Jeremy Vine on his BBC2 radio show (7.5 million listeners) in 2013, when we were both interviewed soon after we launched J4MB as a political party in 2013. She libelled a number of MRAs (including myself) in Men Who Hate Women, and made the laughable claim in that book that she turned up to a men’s issues conference in London.

She clearly has an anxiety disorder, and it’s become markedly worse over time. In today’s Times (£) there’s a long interview with her, Laura Bates: ‘I’ll get 200 rape and death threats on a bad day’. The male “journalist” is utterly uncritical of her throughout, treating her like an anxious child whose every utterance must be regarded as truthful, and the readers’ comments are virtually all supportive of her.

In her new book The New Age of Sexism, she claims to have presented herself as an avatar in cyberspace, where she is “groped and abused in virtual reality” (but not, of course, in reality – a foreign land to her?) Then this: “Posing as a man, she commands her smartphone to summon into semi-existence an 18-year-old AI girlfriend who is up for being sexually abused.” Semi-existence? What the hell is that? Non-existence with bells on?

It would be hard to create narratives more likely to make women (already prone to irrational levels of anxiety) believe that men are depraved and sadistic monsters, that men hate women and wish to harm them, when the age-old reality is that men are the great protectors of women and children, and their absence from the family leads to a range of problems. Also, something you’ll never find Bates admitting, something she’d probably find quite impossible to believe, women are more likely to be abused by a female partner than by a male partner.

Feminists are, of course, the only people who seek to exploit women’s anxiety for personal gain, most obviously seen in their rape and domestic abuse industries, through spreading lies about the issues. But I think Bates may be a curious exception, although she has spread lies about issues and has surely profited mightily from her book deals, personal appearances etc. She seems to genuinely believes her own rhetoric, and those who owe her a duty of care – such as her New York-based publisher Simon & Schuster – instead cynically exploit her.

I am convinced that Bates is, psychologically, a frightened girl trapped in a woman’s body. She’s a classic example of female “failure to launch” as an adult. I fear that she will come to a point where her sense of victimhood and hysteria become so overwhelming that she considers suicide (if she hasn’t already). She needs psychological help NOW and should have had it many years ago, for the sake of not only herself but also other women (and men).

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Excellent.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

A new press release from parliament. A new idiotic inquiry into misogyny, the feminist projection of their own misandry onto men, seeing misogyny where it doesn’t exist – misogyny being, of course, being reflected (in feminists’ shrivelled pea-brains) in men’s and boys’ attitudes and behaviours that seek to (justifiably) hold women and girls accountable for their actions and inactions. An extract:

“The inquiry will explore the prevalence and impact of misogynistic views, attitudes and behaviour among young men and boys, particularly in schools and educational settings and the reasons for this. It will examine ways that boys and young men are also being harmed and if better support, activities and services need to be available to them. 

MPs on the cross-party Committee, chaired by Labour MP Sarah Owen, will examine evidence of rising misogyny among young men and boys, and the role of social media and online communities, referred to as the ‘manosphere’.

It will also look at how online content and the availability of violent pornography, is contributing to sexist and misogynistic attitudes, behaviour and violence against women and girls both online and offline. 

The inquiry will examine how social media influencers are shaping attitudes towards women and girls and the strategies and interventions needed to address this. 

It will also assess what role social media companies and online platforms are playing in the promotion of misogynistic content and what policies they have in place for deplatforming or demonetising this content.” [J4MB emphasis: Doubtless this website, along with many others, is in the firing line.]

Another:

“Women and Equalities Committee (WEC) Chair Sarah Owen MP said: “The recent television drama Adolescence brought into sharp political and public focus the burgeoning issue of misogynistic views and behaviour among young men and boys and the questions over its prevalence, particularly in schools and educational settings. [J4MB emphasis: A work of fiction depicting something that has never occurred in the UK – a 13-year-old boy knifing to death a 13-year-old girl – “brought into sharp political and public focus the burgeoning issue of misogynistic views and behaviour among young men and boys”. You couldn’t make this s*** up except, of course, that feminists like Sarah Bloody-Owen MP DO.]

“With young people spending significant amounts of time online, the Committee want to conduct a timely assessment of the drivers for such attitudes, as well as explore the complex interplay with social media content, the online manosphere and violent pornography.        

“This inquiry will examine what more could be done both on and offline to address these trends, and also feeds into WEC’s wider scrutiny of Government work to tackle violence against women and girls.” “

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Interesting. The companies must be performing so much better now… no, hold on…

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

The CPS yesterday published this, while Birmingham Live yesterday published this. His crimes were “laid bare” after a “seven-year police probe” during which he presumably continued to mutilate boys’ genitals. What could be more “two-tier justice” than allowing adherents of two religions to have their sons’ genitals mutilated without fear of punishment (but of course not their daughters’ genitals).

Neither account mentions what punishment the man will receive. I’ve contacted the journalist to ask about this.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Today’s video is here (1:37).

Over a period of almost six months we’re posting links to one video daily from the comedy channel of our associated award-winning website, Laughing at Feminists. Remember, it’s more than important to laugh at feminists, it’s a civic duty.  

You might also be interested in the 700+ videos on our YouTube channel, which includes our media appearances since 2012, 300+ videos of talks and other materials from the International Conferences on Men’s Issues (2014 – ), from the other men’s issues conferences we’ve been involved with, and so much more. The individual conference playlists are here.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Enjoy.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Interesting (video, 38:24). Susie Bennett is a PhD student at the Suicidal Behaviour Research Laboratory in the University of Glasgow (22 of the 28 members of the Laboratory are women). I’ve posted the following comments, which take up the remainder of this blog piece:

“Thanks for this fascinating interview which I’ll link to on our website.

Susie comes across as a very intelligent and compassionate woman, but there’s a whole area she doesn’t cover in this interview. To my mind, the key reason that far more men than women commit suicide in the UK – and globally – is not so much their responses to life’s challenges, but that they’re far more likely to face life challenges which lead to the wish to end life.

Two obvious examples:

– homelessness, over 90% of the street homeless are men

– denial of access to children after family breakdowns (over 90% of parents denied access are fathers).

Now, as with so many other suicide-inducing challenges, these are male disadvantages (and causes of suffering) created by female privilege – in the first case through preference for accommodation, in the second through women’s greater power to persuade family courts to deny child access to the other parent. I understand the male suicide rate increases threefold after fathers are exposed to family courts.

Surely the key to reducing the male suicide rate lies in ending (or at least reducing) the incidence of such devastating life challenges as denial of access to children? The empathy gap will always be with us, and a lack of funding for initiatives for men is but one of many consequences of it.

One final thought. Many men find that when life is at the most challenging for them – e.g. they lose their jobs, and are struggling to find another – their (female) partners head for the hills, one consequence of female hypergamy. And lower-status men probably won’t have a female partner in the first place, again because of female hypergamy.

Mike Buchanan

JUSTICE FOR MEN & BOYS”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.