Our thanks to Steve for this. We can be sure 95%+ of those affected will be men.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Justice for Men & Boys 
There is in this the battle with reality. In the western world that widely trumpets the unessential nature of fathers and fatherhood. Often adding in claims of widespread ” oppression” and “domestic abuse”. In the UK declaring for all state agencies “the family” is in fact “a woman and her children”. It should be no surprise that there is a lot of exactly what has been wished for, families of “a woman and her children”. Specially as family courts don’t even bother to enforce father’s agreed access. And in the UK explicitly revoking the theory both parents are important. Into this supposedly feminist heaven intrudes the reality, that rarely does the mother on her own actually earn enough to keep this supposedly perfect family form afloat. So in steps the welfare state (aka the tax payers) however in making this perfect family form more and more common the bill grows bigger and bigger in a trend easily charted from the mid sixties. So “someone” has to pay up. And suddenly the supposedly superfluous father is “responsible” despite being a patriarchal despot. A responsibility with no linked rights. Not even a check that the money is being spent for the intended purpose and certainly not to see and meet the intendended beneficiary. So, as in this case, the state pursues “irresponsible” fathers (and even imprisons them …. how they are supposed to earn and pay in prison I don’t know) basically because of the problem it has created! In truth it should say to the tax payer “we have to keep coming to you for more and more tax to pay for the welfare needed to keep afloat fatherless families, a situation we’ve played a central role in creating”. I believe only half Americans have passports given their nation is so vast there is little need to travel. So this is probably virtue signalling to feminists and taxpayers.
LikeLiked by 3 people
As Nigel states, “The UK explicitly revoking the theory that both parents are important…”
In 1990, the pamphlet ‘The Family Way’ was published by the Institute for Public Policy Research. Largely authored by feminist Labour politician Harriet Harman, with feminist co-authors Anna Coote and Patricia Hewitt, Harman asserted that: “It cannot be assumed that males are bound to be an asset to family life, or that the presence of fathers in families is necessarily a means of social cohesion.”
Hmmm…obviously Ms HarmMan hasn’t been paying attention to what was already known across the pond, and published by Daniel Amneus. In the USA, the vast majority of prisoners are from fatherless homes. As were almost all school shooters. In the UK, boys from ‘families’ headed by single mothers would be more likely to end up expelled from school or ‘diagnosed’ with ADHD, fail academically, and end up homeless or in jail. As for girls – the victims of the grooming gangs had no father to protect their interests or defend their vulnerability. The daughters of single mothers are three times more likely to give birth while still in their teens. They never enter the workforce, but make use of a welfare system that rewards them for their behaviour.
Harriet Harman has been brought back by Starmer in order to signal to the feminist backbenchers that he remains on board with the destructive social engineering designed to obliterate the male role in society other than the patsy who always picks up the tab.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Honestly, this is sickening. Because of the economic factors many man are locked in a merry go round of inability to actually work and pay child support because of incarceration/lack of well pay jobs/etc.
LikeLiked by 1 person
thought there might be hope here with Trump when he questioned divorce settlements previously, but who was I kidding…
LikeLike