Our thanks to Rob for this. Extracts:
“Proposed legal reforms on relationships risk inadvertently drawing cohabiting couples into marriage-style commitments without their knowledge, critics have warned.
Under plans put forward by the Government, a formal system would be introduced to regulate financial outcomes following the separation of unmarried partners.
In addition, the measures would grant surviving partners the legal right to inherit an unmarried partner‘s assets should they die intestate.
he changes would also ensure pre-nuptial agreements become legally binding…
Backers of the proposal said they thought “cohabiting couples should have some legal protections” and that reforms “would mean women [J4MP emphasis] are protected” when relationships break down.”
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Justice for Men & Boys 
The intention of Government policy is that all women should benefit from all men – whether men choose to marry or not. If you cohabit with a woman, you’re being set up to be asset-stripped. If you choose to eschew women, you’ll be taxed to the hilt, providing a welfare state where you can support the poor reproductive choices of women you have never met, and their mongrel litters consisting of uncapped numbers of children. For men, it’s not so much Hobson’s Choice as Morton’s Fork.
LikeLiked by 1 person