Harriet Harman: Ban men from running for next Labia leader

Our thanks to Neil for this. An extract:

“She said Labour needed to “start the discussion about male ambition and male allyship”, and that “male ambition should not be to lead themselves, male ambition ought to be to support a woman to lead”.”

If she gets her way, we would hope more men (and some women) would finally wake up to the feminist assaults on their rights over the past 50+ years, and vote for parties other than than the Labia party.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

One thought on “Harriet Harman: Ban men from running for next Labia leader

  1. There are 188 women in the Parliamentary Labour Party, 46% of the total. Not one of them threw her hat in the ring to challenge Starmer for the leadership. It’s obvious that they do not like taking risk, and prefer to rig the game through all-women shortlists. In Harriet’s world, men should simply roll over and acquiesce. Worse, women expect us to provide support, so that they can ‘lead’.
    Women cannot free themselves from the expectations of domesticity – that they should be provided for.
    Domesticity isn’t the workplace. In domesticity, men were content to acquiesce and support, as they were being provided with something in return.
    But in the workplace, in return for our compliance, we are rewarded by chaos. Women claim that they are natural leaders (as long as they are getting the right support, of course). Yet, according to today’s BBC article, they can barely function some of the time.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0jk6wjkn0o
    We simply have to hope that crises occur when the poor dears can cope.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment