Our thanks to Tom for this. Note from the Executive Summary zero mention of the boys who were over 20% of the victims, as reported by Baroness Casey.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Justice for Men & Boys 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c07dnrgez84o I was first aware of this from Ann Cryer, feminist labour MP beneficiary of all women shortlist. Her exposure of the problem in West Yorkshire earned her vilification from her own party and the sistas. Yet her stance was actually fully consistent with a feminist view! Over 20 years ago she was not the last Labour MP to get pounced on for raising this issue. In those 20 years feminists in fact focussed on “rape culture” amongst students, mico aggressions, an ever widening list of sexual harassment behaviours and deliberately traducing due process in the criminal justice system(though unsuccessful in getting English Universities to mirror the ‘kangaroo courts” in the USA and Oz). All the while completely ignoring the actual huge problem of so clearly set out in this report.
While pursuing white students and their often drunken one night stands and “misogyny” (basically what was called sexism till it became obvious sexism against males is a thing) they ignored the 250,000 victims of the grooming gangs. Now in any one year there may be 3000 prosecutions for sexual crimes, usually 1000 for rape. So one can see the scale of the rape gangs in the overall scheme of things. Put simply taking resulted action on this would have reduced sexual offending massively turning a rare crime into a very rare one indeed. Instead of course we have the latest ruse, ditch Jury trials because juries are reluctant to convict if two adults go to have sex and one regrets it later.
GIven the feminists willingness to point to the Taliban in far away places it is truly extraordinary their willingness to not only ignore the same things right in their own country. Not only ignore it but actually vilify those of their number who dare to point to it. Proof positive that the feminist project has nothing to do with actually dealing with issues that affect huge numbers of girls (and boys) and everything to do with advantaging already privileged women in our upper middle class.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It never seems to be asked. But given that the Pakistani Grooming Gangs come from an unashamedly “patriarchal” society which has arranged marriages, male clan leaders and religious leaders, fathers rights and men’s rights in divorce. Etc. Isn’t it extraordinary that feminism isn’t all over this. Even more extraordinary that as well as ignoring a “case study” that appears to fit exactly their theory, they actively shut up any of the their number who point this out. The Sikh community, unashamedly patriarchal, takes action to protect their girls and women. Tommy Robinson and supporters do the same from a much less patriarchal community … And get treated like the problem.
no one seems to dig into why it is the feminists, who you’d think would be all over this, are in fact the most likely to ignore the evidence and trash any of their number who state the obvious.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The feminist obsession is with power. Their belief is that if they attack heterosexual white men, they, and their ‘intersectional allies’ can fill the resultant power vacuum.
Their modus operandi is therefore both sexist and racist. It needs to be called out.
As recently as May of last year, Labour ministers wanted this entire issue to go away.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2ew9jnj2p1o
LikeLiked by 2 people