Our thanks to cp for this:

“As soon as women gain political power, they organise the rules to suit their own reproductive preference of hypergamy through rotating temporary monogamy. This is the sexual freedom which motivates her. There are overriding biological reasons why women are programmed in this way. She seeks resources for herself and her children, she wants the best possible genes for those children, and she (subconsciously?) desires different fathers for her brood, as this will minimise the possibility of genetic defects pervading her entire ‘family’.

[A family = ‘a woman and her children’ according to Harriet Harman and her 1990 publication ‘The Family Way’, provided for the Institute For Public Policy Research. In it, she states “It cannot be assumed that males are bound to be an asset to family life, or that the presence of fathers in families is necessarily a means of social cohesion.” ]

Hence, we have ‘no fault’ divorce, originally introduced into 1950s America by NAWL, the National Association of Women Lawyers. Now prevalent across the West, it is a thinly-disguised means of asset-stripping men while madam moves up in the world with a house, her first kids, and child support.

What else does madam need..? Well, she requires that men, still the majority of the income tax base (72%) should pay for her advanced education, facilitate her placement in the workplace (putting her in proximity to higher value men) through AA, ESG and DEI initiatives. She needs a generous welfare system, with unlimited numbers of children provided for – as a safety net should it all go wrong (or if she’s too lazy to take advantage of her facilitated opportunities). She needs abortion ‘rights’ so that she can forget any little mistakes she made.

So where does that leave us..? The West, once the driver of progress, is now crippled by stagnant or declining real wages since the workplace was swamped by women, often destroying meritocracy in the process. There is a growing gap between rich and poor which is all too real (unlike the imaginary ‘gender pay gap’). There is unsustainable public debt, much of it used to finance the social security of women through welfare, and promoting the over-production of young female graduates. The debt will be subject to Stein’s Law of Economics – if something cannot go on forever, it will stop. Abruptly.

Meanwhile, women, safe in the social cocoon provided for them, and blithely unaware of much beyond themselves, refuse to engage with men beneath their pay grade. Their ‘standards’ of hypergamy have become astronomical. In the US, they threatened a (quite ridiculous) 4B Movement because they were a bit peeved that the Nov 2024 presidential election didn’t go their way, and they didn’t get Kamala Harris in power, to further increase the economic and social pressure on men!

They just don’t get it! When women induce social situations where men can’t have sex with them, men quickly realise that the ladies are simply vectors of materialistic aggravation. A whole lot of hard work, without a compensation package.

So – we check out. What does society offer us under Starmer, who built his career by pandering to feminists? He signalled his credentials in the 2012 Levitt Report which he co-authored with Alison Levitt, and has a predominately female Cabinet, including a Home Secretary who wants mandatory chemical castration for male sex offenders, while ignoring the rates of false accusation for such offences (the forged statistics of the Levitt Report were handy, here). Meanwhile, she aims to close women’s prisons. Those women will turn on Starmer when he no longer serves a purpose, or if he upsets them. Louise Haigh, Lucy Powell, Angela Rayner… He’s got a lot to learn, and is fiddling while Rome burns.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.