NHS ‘failing women and girls’ and has ‘appalling culture of medical misogyny’, health secretary says

Our thanks to Nigel for this. He writes:

“In this country we have a new Women’s Health Strategy. As usual its all couched in the language of sexism “medical misogyny” and must do more. What it actually addresses is failings in the midwifery services and other female specialist areas of the NHS. Which are of course the most “female dominated” parts of the NHS. Which means of course that the supposed sexists and misogynists will mainly have been female! Somehow improving how women look after women in the women’s specialist NHS addresses “sexism” and “misogyny” ????

Meanwhile of course in fact men are far more likely to get late diagnoses, delayed treatment and die in almost every category of disease and illness that is common to all people. And of course they don’t have whole specialisms devoted to their health as males. In the “victim Olympics” the actual data shows its men who could claim to be subjected to “sexism” and “misandry” which results in their higher risks of actual death. The NHS obfuscating and squirming to avoid having a national screening programme for Prostate Cancer being a prime example! Wes Streeting just spouts the words when in fact he’s talking about an organisation whose workforce is 74% female, 81% female in NHS Maternity and related services. Does no one apply common sense?”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

One thought on “NHS ‘failing women and girls’ and has ‘appalling culture of medical misogyny’, health secretary says

  1. This is interesting Women are just as autistic as men – but hide it better partly because “hiding it better” suggests they’re not that Autistic if they know how they appear to others. However it would not surprise me that there are more Autistic girls and women. The mechanics of this are generally a referral is made if the pupil is a “problem” (in Childhood Autism is picked up by the Educational Psychology services). And of course boys are far more likely to be perceived as a problem than Girls. I recall years ago in conversation with an Educational Psychologist she observed that the same behaviours were tolerated in Girls that led to referrals to her service about boys. I can well imagine behaviours that are “feisty” or “sassy” in young girls become rather more a problem in a 15 year old. Though again time and again we see “social contagion” amongst groups of girls as certain conditions become popular on social media. So this my be a part of it. I suppose it could go two ways a. resources get directed at girls and women and reduced for boys and men with diagnoses. or b. Autism becomes yet another saving girls and women thing and the whole field benefits from the sorts of resources that only get generated for saving women and girls, with males benefitting by default.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment