2063: The year Britain becomes unrecognisable

/ Andy Antifeminist

On his Substack, Matt Goodwin gives us notice of an upcoming interview with Andrew Gold on the excellent Heretics podcast, due to be released in the next 24 hours. The Substack article is here. Subscribe here to the Heretics channel to see some big names interviewed. You will not be disappointed !

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

3 thoughts on “2063: The year Britain becomes unrecognisable”

  1. A blueprint for destruction of the west:

    1. For every job given to a woman instead of a man, there goes another man who will find it difficult, if not impossible, to attract a woman of his own and form a family. In his 2004 work on ‘Sexual Economics’, Roy F Baumeister reckoned that a job was a man’s main trading card in the sexual marketplace. Decades prior to Baumeister, the British zoologist and founder of Group Selection Theory, V C Wynne-Edwards, reckoned that having a job represented a man’s ‘licence to breed’. The male role as breadwinner and head of family (‘Patriarchy’) is thereby insidiously destroyed.
    2. Convince feminists that this is in their interests (Linda Gordon: “The nuclear family must be destroyed”). It will certainly leave them free to follow female reproductive instinct of rotating monogamy, always aiming UP. Having a hybrid litter sired by different fathers offers genetic advantages to females. Multiple fathers minimises the risk of propagating paternal genetic defects, while she remains assured that HER genes prevail.
    3. With sufficient feminist politicians, the Overton Window shifts towards policies which subtly favour those female reproductive instincts. ‘No fault’ divorce. The Duluth model of DV, in case fault must be fibricated. ‘Progressive’ policies such as AA, EEO, ESG, DEI give women the jobs and ensure that society is progressively weakened. All men beneath a woman’s pay grade are now invisible, and ‘sexual harassment’ legislation keep them invisible by law. There will be generous welfare available (paid for by men, still currently 71% of the tax base) to support women who are too lazy or disinclined to play an education and employment system gamed in their favour. Making University a hostile environment for men will maintain women as the political and jurisprudence class of the future.
    4. Feminist propaganda causes a toxic dating culture and breakdown in trust between the sexes. This leads to collapse of birth rates. Men have no stake in the system, refuse to gamble their resources in a rigged casino, and will not fight to defend it. An over-reliance on immigration causes an eventual collapse/takeover, where women can offer minimal/no resistance.

    Be surprised if it lasts until 2063.

    How different it was, just a century previously. The Beatles, Concorde, the Rover P6.

    Why would it fall apart so quickly..? For the best distillation of a single reason, Steve Moxon is on the money. Far from oppressing women, men defer to women.

    https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/

    The inevitable corollary is that just one woman on a decision-making panel will influence the outcome in female favour.

    Take a look at Starmer’s cabinet. Or Cameron’s all-women shortlists, to give fair weighting to how both left and right walk straight into the trap which hides in plain sight.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    • With the feminisation of men and with the falling birth rates being replaced by immigration from more ‘patriarchal’ cultures, what will the feminists of the future have to look forward to? No doubt they will bleat “Where have all the good and strong men gone to protect us ?”

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

      • Caught a glimpse of what they could look forward to on the BBC, a couple of years back.

        https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-67084850

        Still, at least she’s happy. Apart from running out of milk.

        https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8rdvydll6zo

        Back in the real world of 2063, they’ll probably be looking forward to living in a spilled jigsaw puzzle where the only successful pieces have retained imposition of moral codes on women, through religion. Many of these will contain elements of arranged marriage, never prevalent in the west, apart from amongst the landed gentry, as a means of retaining and expanding wealth. Eligibility criteria will be established by parents or guardians, and there will be a general insouciance towards notions of female ‘happiness’… even on the far left of the board where the jigsaw puzzle once sat in its dying days, because the tax money will have dwindled through chasing men from the workplace, and low-hanging fruit of fossil fuels will be controlled by men who remembered what masculinity was for.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment