Our thanks to William for this excellent piece (video, 17:51). Helen Andrews makes the points that the feminisation of institutions has inevitably led to declining standards, less objectivity and more subjectivity, more wokeness, and a feminised society is a society on the road to collapse.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Justice for Men & Boys 
We can see this in the UK. We have become a “consumer society” because the female consumes, without much consideration of who or how the consumption is facilitated or fed. Helen Andrews points out a series of professions/sectors .. but thinking about them they aren’t producing much (with the exception of medicine perhaps) they are “administration” in its widest sense. In some sense this may not be such a problem, but crowding into these occupations creates a huge section of the population completely oblivious to and unconcerned about production. Thus unlike the post WW2 exhortations to produce and export to pay off war debt and rebuild the country/economy we never hear any such thing, only lists of things “the Government” or “society” should do, as if the resources necessary will just appear. While precisely those qualities of energy, innovation, exploration, “getting stuck in” etc. that built our complex societies are derided or even turned into “disorders”. Thus no surprise to read today of 200,000 young men “signed off” onto a life of benefits for what were once “conduct disorders” in schools.
It was very interesting to follow the debates in the Ukrainian “parliament” as the Gov. tried to extend conscription. Apart from anything else the very real problem meant brutal honesty. The result reflected reality; firstly that females are of marginal value in this context, secondly that the war would “end” and the nation would need men to rebuild it and make it prosper and thirdly that the most dynamic males for that task will be younger men, because they have the energy, inventiveness, etc. The result was Ukraine’s rather unusual “draft” that targets the over 25s (unlike for instance “19” the average age of US military casualties in Vietnam). The point being without the cloud of borrowing that fuels UK consumption and facing some very real choices about just how many of its men are disposable either dead, captured or crippled, Ukraine had to face reality. Our “reality” of a consumer society only sustainable while we (Gov. and citizens) can borrow will face either another financial crash or a continued decline in wealth.
LikeLiked by 1 person