At the request of a generous donor, herewith Jess Phillips’s woeful maiden speech (video, 5:38) from 2015, including (from 1:38) these words:
“After university, I had the misfortune of having two children who are both sons, incidentally.”
Check out the gurning female MPs hanging onto every idiotic sentence. The “misfortune” was surely that of her sons and husband, having this misandrous harridan for a mother and wife.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Justice for Men & Boys 
And the terrified cuckolds smiling in acquiescence. Sorry, could only manage two minutes of it.
LikeLiked by 3 people
This vile, evil, hypocritical, horrible, man-hating, carping, misandrist idiot needs to be called out at EVERY opportunity!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks mp, agreed – but otherwise, no objections to her?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Those sons, like so many others, have the misfortune of having a feminist mother, labouring under the illusion of being ‘strong & independent’. This misapprehension is enabled through wealth transfer M->F, through taxation (men 72% of income tax base), welfare, asset stripping of men through ‘no fault’ divorce, ‘progressive’ social policies, discrimination in the job market, ‘gender lens’ investments, ad infinitum, ad nauseam.
Labour harbour many illusions.
In the most basic mechanism of time-keeping, the pendulum, it is already swinging away from the realm inhabited by Ms Phillips and her Dunning-Kruger sorority, and back to reality.
LikeLike
I would argue imagine having a mother who obviously resented you and lacks a moral compass for not even standing up for children who were and still are being abused when the country is demanding it.
imagine having that mother who can’t read the room……
LikeLiked by 1 person
She can read the polls, though, and knows that she mustn’t upset a particular demographic.
To hang on to her seat, this ‘feminist’ is willing to throw girls under the bus. The abuse they suffered at the hands of that demographic is to be hidden behind closed doors. Meanwhile, to make herself seem relevant, she indulges in diversionary moral crusades on stuff which has yet to happen, the ‘perils’ of young men and young women drinking together.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm27q1366d0o
If she wants to clutch her perils as a Safeguarding Minister, there are plenty in the historic casebook of Labour-run Councils awaiting her attention.
In terms of the utter hypocrisy of feminism, there can be few more egregious examples than feminists who abandon girls to abuse for the sake of their own careers. It’s an obvious Achilles Heel into which arrows can be fired every time she stands up with that smug, superior grin on her face.
LikeLike