James Esses: “How charities impose radical gender ideology on our children. The SHOCKING case of Mermaids.”

Interesting.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

One thought on “James Esses: “How charities impose radical gender ideology on our children. The SHOCKING case of Mermaids.”

  1. “Imagine that this charity was, for several years, run by a woman who, in a TedTalk, admitted to taking her own 16-year-old son to Thailand to have his genitals removed, on the basis it was illegal to offer such surgery in the UK. She even joked about her son’s genitals, saying they were underdeveloped so “not much to work with”.”

    This says it all about the advance of this issue, while it was assumed to be boys this affected the ideology was spread and lauded. The most extreme form of the laughter at a character being kicked in the balls or the jokes about of John Wayne Bobbitt. But then it got out that many “trans” teenagers were girls, to today where the majority of the ballooning numbers of “trans” teenagers are girls. All of a sudden the “Tavistock” goes from “trail blazing” to being shut down.

    And from whence did this ideology originate? Well the WEP article gives a great big clue “WE held a members’ assembly to try to shed light and diminish heat in the fight between trans inclusive and gender critical feminism that is weakening the women’s movement to the delight of regressive populists.”

    So they admit that its two forms of feminism from within the “Women’s movement” that are fighting. And of course “regressive populists” are those outside the movement who never thought biology was unimportant in the first place.

    Like

Leave a comment