One thought on “Why women shouldn’t be allowed near the front line in the military”

1. But women are equally as capable as men and if they can’t meet the physical requirements its sexist (or now as we call it misogynist) not to reduce the standards ! In public “services” such as the Army, Navy, Airforce, Police, Fire services and Paramedics. Ones where the price of this is paid by people in need of help and by colleagues lives. Because of course feminist orthodoxy is now western orthodoxy in Gender studies; gender is a performance that can be learned and changed and biology a minor inconvenience. Except of course in sports where suddenly those very same feminists declare it obvious that boys and men will always win because of their Biology! Not only men but apparently girls and women with “raised testosterone” who have always performed “woman” from their birth to their triumphs in the Olympic Games Boxing.

   This suppurating sore (yawning chasm) in feminism should be constantly picked at by anti feminists because it illustrates the idiocy of the whole enterprise. Clearly the woman unable to fire the cannon would be a liability on the battlefield, yet the gender theorists will claim it was the equipment that was wrong and the enemy should wait until lighter cannons are available. Yet in the Olympics the two life long females so hated by the Terfs were powerful because they had a condition that gave them “too powerful punches” and women will “always lose” if facing women with such a condition, men who have lots of “treatment” and; shock horror, actual men. The latter clearly gifted with apparently superhuman physical attributes that would obliterate “womens sport”, due to their biology. I don’t know why more feminists are pressed on this point, if its vital men (or even individuals with a lot of male hormones) do not compete in sport (where there is little real danger or actual impact on the world except as entertainment) how come its just fine and dandy to pretend that this is not so where the price of failure is so much more serious involving peoples lives?

   On a lighter note one must congratulate Mr Tickle (Roxanne Tickle) for his success against the company “Giggle”. Partly because the names accurately reflect the level of farce we have been reduced to. His/her achievement being to make it possible to join a Cabal of Karens ( thank you Carl Benjamin) dedicated to whining about men. Roxanne Tickle: Australian court rules in case that asked ‘what is a woman?’ – BBC News It seems an important “Sex based right” is to join Giggle to whinge about men.

   LikeLike

   Reply