A piece on the BBC website. Extracts:
Police said he had attacked the woman because she had short hair, and so assumed she was a feminist.
“Since you have short hair, you must be a feminist. I’m a male chauvinist, and I think feminists deserve to be assaulted,” he told her, according to police comments reported by the Korea Herald newspaper…
Anti-feminist feeling has also increased in recent years – particularly among young men who feel they have been disadvantaged by reverse discrimination.
The last sentence would be correct if the words “feel they” were removed.
—————————-
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.
If everyone who reads this gives us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. You can support our work by making a donation here.
‘The last sentence would be correct if the words “feel they” were removed.’
That same sentence would also be correct if the word “reverse” was removed. Otherwise discrimination is by definition against women, which it absolutely is not. We see this same corruption of the definition of “sexism”. And of course, the definition of “feminism” is the antithesis of what it actually is.
Exactly so. Constantly we are reminded by the idiotic trans. debates that women have “sex based rights” to protect. I have yet to see anything about men’s sex based rights, to be protected from the growing numbers of “trans men”. Because of course there aren’t any. One more proof that the feminists are not remotely interested in eqaul rights, where neither sex would have rights purely on the basis of sex, but accruing privileges for women.