An interesting piece in The Washington Post, the start:
The international governing body for chess has released new policies that prohibit transgender women from competing in women’s events and will strip some transgender players of their titles.
Under the new guidelines from the International Chess Federation — known by its French acronym, FIDE — individuals who transition from male to female have “no right” to compete in official events for women until “further analysis” is made, which could take up to two years. Additionally, if a player holds titles in women’s categories and transitions to male, “the women titles are to be abolished,” while if the player transitions from male to female, the titles will remain, the handbook says. [J4MB: Well, that makes sense…]
Later in the piece:
But “there’s not that physicality dimension to chess, it’s a game of strategy,” said Richard Pringle, a professor of sociology and education who studies gender and sexuality [J4MB: In plain English, he’s a mangina] in the context of sport at Monash University in Australia. “It suggests that males are somehow strategically better. … It’s not just transphobic, it’s anti-feminist too,” he said of the ban, adding that it was “likely a political decision rather than an issue of fairness.
‘Professor’ Pringle’s page on the Monash University website is here. He proudly lays out his mangina credentials there.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
Our YouTube channel is here, our Facebook channel here, our Twitter channel here.
If everyone who reads this gives us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. You can support our work by making a donation here.
“critical qualitative researcher” I recall this from Uni in the late 70s . Code for talking to tiny numbers of very unusual people and claiming grandiose ideas about “society” from such chats.
However he does identify the key question. What exactly are the male advantages that require women only chess competions. If it’s not that the pieces are so heavy. Oh dear then there is are the brains different?! Feminist heresy of course .
More popcorn as the feminist wings fight over what they have created.