Our thanks to Jake for this. We covered paternity fraud in our last general election manifesto (pp.52-4).

Jake writes:

Another case of a “learned” family judge, Justice Cohen, failing to recognise any harm done by paternity fraud, and refusing a refund of child support / money spent on the child or any form of compensation payable by the fraudulent ex-wife to the aggrieved ex-husband.

Paragraph 40 is particularly egregious:

“I disagree that by taking on pecuniary responsibility for C H has satisfied the requirement that he must give credit for the benefit received. The benefits of having a much loved child in a party’s life is not to be measured purely in expenditure made.”

Disgusting demonstration of the empathy gap. Babies mistakenly swooped at birth by incompetent hospital staff? Very different judgement made.

Jake

—————————-

Our last general election manifesto is here.

Our YouTube channel is here.

If everyone who read this gave us £5.00 – or even better, £5.00 or more, monthly – we could change the world. £5.00 monthly would entitle you to Bronze party membership, details here. Benefits include a dedicated and signed book by Mike Buchanan. Click below to make a difference. Thanks.