The following piece in yesterday’s Times is typical of mainstream media coverage of the potential banning of MGM in Iceland. It starts off with a scandalous claim underneath the caption:
Times caption: Medical experts argue health benefits favour continuing the practice of circumcision
Male circumcision could be outlawed in Europe for the first time under a draft law in Iceland that has pitted children’s rights campaigners against religious leaders.
Circumcising a boy for non-medical reasons would be punishable by up to six years in prison under the bill tabled by Silja Dogg Gunnarsdottir, an MP from the centre-right Progressive Party. She proposed the legislation, which has broad support in parliament and among the public, to ensure that boys are protected in the same way as girls after a ban on female genital mutilation in 2005.
“I see it as a child protection matter,” she said. “In Iceland we acknowledge the right to believe but we also acknowledge the right and freedom of everyone to choose and have their opinions.”
The bill says that circumcision “involves permanent interventions in a child’s body that can cause severe pain”. Referring to religious opposition to the legislation, the MP said: “Children should have their own rights for their own beliefs when they are adults.”
Christian leaders on the island and on the Continent are supporting Jewish and Muslim clerics who are fighting the measure on the grounds that it discriminates against people of non-Christian faiths and is an attack on religious freedom.
There are fewer than 2,000 Jews and Muslims in Iceland but the dominant Christian church in the country also opposes the bill. Agnes Sigurdardottir, the bishop of Iceland, said that it could turn Jews and Muslims into criminals.
“The danger that arises if this bill becomes law is that Judaism and Islam will become criminalised religions,” the Lutheran bishop said. Children must be given the right to grow up in their family’s religious and cultural practices, she added.
Cardinal Reinhard Marx, president of the Catholic Church in the European Union, called the proposed law a dangerous attack on religious freedom. “The criminalisation of circumcision is a very grave measure that raises deep concern.”
One in three men in the world is circumcised, according to the World Health Organisation. The circumcision rate in the United States has declined from 83 per cent in the 1960s to about 75 per cent.
Medical experts argue that health benefits favour continuing the practice [J4MB: Absolute nonsense. Not one doctors’ representative body in the world calls for routine male infant circumcision.] but European states are increasingly treating circumcision as a question of children’s rights. A 2012 law in Germany permits only trained professionals to perform the operation. The measure was taken after a court ruling that circumcision “permanently and irreparably changed” a child’s body and took away their right to decide their own religious affiliation.
In 2013 the Council of Europe passed a resolution calling on its 47 member states to regulate practices concerning ritual circumcision.
You can subscribe to The Times here.
All the mainstream media coverage we’ve seen of the Iceland story has included far too much commentary from religious people, and far too little commentary (if any) from opponents to the procedure. If potential health consequences are touched on, it’s invariably to suggest that the MGM can bring physical benefits, never that it always results in physical harm, and sometimes psychological harm.
Last night we had an email from a young man asking for sources of material debunking the claimed medical benefits of MGM. We pointed him to William Collins’s blog, specifically four pieces:
MGM: Claimed Medical Benefits – Part 1
Justice for Men & Boys 
“The danger that arises if this bill becomes law is that Judaism and Islam will become criminalised religions,” the Lutheran bishop said. Children must be given the right to grow up in their family’s religious and cultural practices, she added.”
But of course those countries that have passed a law banning FGM have said precisely the opposite. In that case the claims of parents to religious or cultural rights are ignored totally! The cultures practising FGM claim religious and cultural practice gives them the right to do the procedures! There is no difference apart from the much smaller numbers. .
LikeLike
Fascinating to me is the usual reference to “health experts” which in effect seems to mean in the US. Why not ask here in the UK ?
LikeLike
I imagine there’s ongoing easy money to be made from circumcision?
Then that’s the real reason their parents -whose job it would normally be to protect them – are lied to, deceived and misled.
And then there’s the added advantage that the ‘customers’ themselves can hardly complain, can they…
Therefore, all the other arguments –
supposed health ‘benefits’, religion, group identity, etc. etc. are disinformation, misdirection, bull-sh*t and stuff & nonsense.
Back in the times when living conditons were primitive, and soap and running water not available, there might just have been some sort of pratcical justification for it, but not now.
As with that other pernicious scam –
feMarxism – there is nothing more (and nothing less!) than power, money, greed and self interest at work here.
The remedy’s the same too.
Time to come down on it hard.
LikeLike
We calculated two or three years ago that some Jewish mohels earn millions of pounds over their butchery ‘careers’. In the UK, Muslim boys outnumber Jewish babies 10:1 in suffering the mutilations. The day is hopefully coming when Jews and Muslims will hang their heads in shame for having continued this despicable practice for so long into the modern era. I hope to live long enough to see that day, but I doubt I shall.
LikeLike
We hope you will too Mike!
LikeLike