8 thoughts on “William Collins: Two more false rape cases”

1. The BBC sets it out clearly http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42841346 and the report includes: “The Crown Prosecution Service, the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) and the College of Policing have launched an “improvement plan” to tackle the issue.” As all three have published guidance to “believe the victim” they are not going to assist in unravelling their own policies of prosecutions at any cost(though will pretend to).

   LikeLike

   Reply

   • The “believe the victim” policy was based on an erroneous reading of a letter from the Police Authority?, since publicly corrected, who said they should do not such thing. What they were told to do, in fact, was to believe the complainant only so far as starting an investigation. From then on, they should look for evidence and keep an open mind. Needless to say, the women’s movements and their fellow travellers are not going to point out to the fools their stupid, and very convenient, mistake.

     The actual letter was published in one of the national papers.

     LikeLike

     Reply

     • Its much worse than that. ACPO and the Police College Guidance is pretty clearly advising on making a case not investigating. I doubt the various training and Guidance from all the main agencies under the “Violence Against Women and Girls” Strategy will be looked at closely but if it were there would be shock at how clearly it traduces the Police duty to investigate and the CPS’ duty to the Court.

       LikeLike

2. As more cases come to light, it seems that incompetence or lack of resources are very unlikely causes; they, one assumes, would lead to a variety of failings, rather than repetition of the same failing. The alternative is that the “believe the victim” doctrine is to blame, together with a deliberate policy to boost convictions to the level they should be if the feminist position were true. Certainly, the claim that false allegations of rape are rare has become untenable, though it may still be the case, I suppose, that women who make false allegations are rare, given that so often false accusers turn out to have made multiple allegations, a phenomenon hidden by anonymity.

   LikeLike

   Reply

   • Alison Saunders has been very clear that within the CPS lack of resources has not been a contributory factor. Quite a number of the cases consist of the police not even looking at the content of e.g. mobiles. This is more about ideologically-driven corruption than incompetence or lack of resources. After all the CPS /police have found the resources for cases with no evidence whatsoever (e.g. Mark Pearson), £2+ million on the Heath investigation… long after he died.

     LikeLike

     Reply

     • “Alison Saunders has been very clear that within the CPS lack of resources has not been a contributory factor.”

       She would have to be very silly to have made such a statement because if we are going to apply Occam s razor as to the cause of such failures, corruption/incompetence would be only factor left.

       Seems like she has been taking bad advice from her own people…

       LikeLike

     • She said it very clearly in an interview we reported.

       LikeLike

3. Wow, charging an innocent man £12 grand for the privilege of locking him up on sex crime charges he was innocent of. Right there, that is ironclad proof that the criminal justice system and the government can’t be trusted to look after the interests of men when they clash with a woman. Can you imagine a woman who was falsely sent to prison for, say, abusing her children on the word of her ex-husband, and then years later was let go and sent a bill for her time in jail? The SJWs would riot in the streets before that got paid – perhaps that is the reason men end up eating the shit sandwich time after time in the modern West; nobody is afraid that cross us will lead to any inconvenience for them or their career.

   LikeLike

   Reply