Our thanks to HEqual for pointing us to a piece on INFOWARS (Paul Joseph Watson, editor). It includes a video (4:55), you’ll need to scroll down and click on the second video link, after the following paragraph:
Peterson himself responded to the controversy in a video posted earlier today, pointing out that there was no evidence of a widespread violent hate campaign targeting Newman and that this appeared to be a contrived excuse to distract from the fact that she got trounced in the debate.
Justice for Men & Boys 
This is taking on a life of its own.
Newman and Channel 4’s desperate attempts to spin the situation are backfiring. There are literally hundreds of Youtube videos about the interview.
Peterson’s book is now number 2 on Amazon US, and number 4 on Amazon UK.
The top review on Amazon UK had the title “Thank you Cathy Newman and Channel 4!”
LikeLike
Good as I expect Jordan Peterson will face “A whole lot of ugly coming from a never ending parade of stupid” in the immortal words of Hairspray.
LikeLike
Peterson’s tweet demonstrates that there is no point in giving even an inch to these people.
LikeLike
Meanwhile over at the MSM websites, the lunatics are doubling down on their losing streak: https://edition.cnn.com/2018/01/21/opinions/how-to-date-in-2018-opinion-roundup/index.html
Men, you need to rehumanise yourself and learn some good sexual citizenship burble burble burble…
EDIT:
I am actually curious what goes through the minds of the people who write articles like this. Do they not realise that the subtext “Men, you scum are defective non-females who barely qualify as human” isn’t going to change anyone’s mind on the other side? I mean, I call feminists and SJWs all the names under the sun, but I’m not trying to change anyone’s mind (usually just wishing them a painful and lingering death for the damage they’ve done to our society). Yet bizarrely, they seem to think that if they patronise us in just the right way, some light will go on somewhere and we’ll agree with their insanity.
LikeLike