Our thanks to Gerry for this. There’s a link to the CPS’s associated public statement. In the latter document:
This paper reaffirms our commitment to male victims of these crimes. [J4MB: How is it possible to reaffirm a commitment which never existed?]…
Involve more national men’s groups in the scrutiny of CPS policies, guidance and training and within the VAWG External Consultation Group. [J4MB: These groups will be those which never call for men to get a share of the funding which overwhelmingly goes to women’s organizations, such as the feminist-friendly Men and Boys Coalition which has seemingly achieved precisely nothing in the 10 months of its existence, as we’d have expected.]
From the coalition’s ‘About’ page:
The Coalition will not:
– Provide and promote solutions to individual issues affecting men and boys, that is the remit of the individual organisations and leaders themselves
– Accept or work with organisations or individuals who are anti-women/girls and/or advocate removing resources from women/girls [J4MB: Our emphasis]
– Accept or work with organisations or individuals who express misogyny, [J4MB: misandry is presumably acceptable] homophobia, transphobia, racism or any other form of bigotry or discrimination
The last time I looked, the coalition’s website didn’t even have a position on MGM.
Anyone who believes that the CPS with Alison Saunders at the helm is ever going to give a flying f*** about the suffering of men or boys must have his head in the clouds. This is nothing more than a cynical PR exercise which confrontation-averse manginas will swallow hook, line and sinker.
If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.
Justice for Men & Boys 
It is remarkable how organisations like the CPS have no historical awareness, and Alison Saunders in particular. If, say, she had made her recent remarks in 1970, not only would she have been sacked on the spot, but when she mentioned ‘biphobia’, no one would have had a clue what she was talking about.
It’s characteristic of left-wing bigots that when they want to close debate they just add the word ‘phobia’ to anything they don’t want discussed.
Alison Saunders makes a very unlikely High Priestess of a new religion. I predict she will be ultimately unsuccessful. Maybe she will fall to Jacob Rees-Mogg, MP and new internet sensation? Let’s profoundly hope so.
LikeLike
‘ … biphobia … ‘
Biphobia? Two fears? A double fear of one thing?
LikeLike
As its the Violence Women and Girls Strategy group etc. clearly its not going to be any help to men and only boys if they’re considered “girls”. Flying Pigs until the organisation ends adherence to the VAWG strategy which is gender feminism enshrined in Gov. policy.
LikeLike
Boys could well be considered as girls by officialdom since some statistics for violence against women and girls include misappropriated and undifferentiated figures for violence against men and boys.
LikeLike
‘This is nothing more than a cynical PR exercise which confrontation-averse manginas … ‘
Most of us have, I’m sure, come across such creatures in forums of all descriptions. They reveal themselves when those of us who understand that nothing can be changed without ‘confrontation’ propose action that might achieve the desired outcomes and they attempt to silence us by claiming that our contributions are not helpful. Typically they use what my late father used to call ‘mealy mouthed’ and ‘sanctimonious’ language and attempt to dominate the moral high ground, often attracting the support of a tiny handful of similarly fearful moral cowards. They are the sort of half-wits who hope that psychopathic dictators can be brought to reason by impotent talk. It is they and not us who are not helpful.
LikeLike