6 thoughts on “Labour MP Chris Williamson faces backlash over women-only carriages idea”

  1. Ha, see how unstuck they come, who decide to jump onto a band wagon, lanching themselves optimistically into the air in what they fondly imagine is a golden soundbite opportunity, but mis-timing the leap!
    Failing to understand the dynamic and it’s reasons, they foolishly rush in where Redstockings fear to tread and…
    duly cock it all up, falling in an unseemly heap in the gutter twixt road and kerb!

    At least it keeps the rest of us amused.

    The fem-bots themselves are even worse of course, lying about their reasons for not wanting, in this case, ‘wimmin’s carriages’.
    “Normalising” assault (I never witnessed ANY b.t.w, in thirty years of hum drum commuting on London’s busiest lines) is nothing whatever to do with it, nor is any other risible fabrication.

    The Real Reason that men and women MUST be all mixed up as much as possible is that otherwise, how can women complain about ‘being assaulted’?

    This is the whole ‘Object of the Exercise’ of course, to make women poor little innocent victims.
    Same in the work place, and in schools and colleges.

    Without being ‘forced’ into the company of boys and men there can be no possibility of being a victim – except there can of course, but we, the hoi polloi aren’t supposed to know about all that.

    Remember, under leftism in general, and feMarxism in particular everything is turned upside down and back to front.

    Said it before, say it again.
    That’s how it all works folks, Brain Scramble.
    Simple, but effective.

    Like

    Reply

    • Vanishingly small. Mr. Williamson’s foray into doomed virtue signalling appears to have been prompted by a climb in the number of “incidents” prosecuted. They had it seems leapt up to a number under 2000 in a year. Now even on my home turf tram system, transporting 100s of thousands a day and with millions of person/journeys a year this would be a tiny number, making it very rare. For London, well I expect someone of Mr. Collins mathematical acumen would calculate the risk to women is miniscule, hence you would indeed be unlikely to have observed such a thing. Of course creating women only carriages for the most fragile ladies would move the risk from tiny to non existent.

      Like

      Reply

  2. It would be interesting to .get a comment on this from Mark Pearson who was wrongly and maliciously accused of sexual assault on Waterloo station a couple of years ago. In the light of his experience perhaps women should be forced to go into separate carriages.
    Seriously though if woman only carriages ever became a reality it would be a wonderful opportunity for civil disobedience Rosa Parks style

    Like

    Reply

  3. Personally I approve women only carriages and floors and the same for men and for clubs. We need to accentuate the differences not cover them up. Once the differences are properly acknowledged we could escape from this ridiculous gender equality myth. In any case men and women in an office adds a layer of distraction often too obvious for words.

    Like

    Reply

  4. Don’t celebrate too soon. When female areas was first suggested for India’s busses, it was shouted out by the feminists, who didn’t want women controlled in what they could do, who they could attack/accuse, where they went, etc.

    A few years later, instead of female areas, it was suggested that there be areas where men are not allowed. No complaints about that and instead of ‘women-only’ India has ‘men disbarred’.

    Spot the difference?

    It’s OK to ban men, as we can see by the female-only golf clubs, children’s creches, education supplements, the Girl Guides, school sports traditionally for girls, university groups, swimming sessions… Just don’t try restricting women, see?

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment