Our thanks to AVfM for this article in the New York Post. The start of the piece:
A woman who admitted she pulled the plug from her fiancé’s kayak and was “euphoric” as she watched him drown in the frigid Hudson River dodged murder and manslaughter raps Monday, taking a plea deal for the lesser charge of criminally negligent homicide.
Angelika Graswald, 37, who had faced 25 years to life in prison if convicted at trial now faces as little as 16 months to four years behind bars.
And with time served since her imprisonment in 2015, the slap -on-the-wrist sentence could see her released on parole as soon as December, her lawyer said.
The deal comes despite Graswald’s stunning statements to police, which a judge ruled could be admitted into evidence.
“I wanted him dead and now he’s gone,” she told cops during a lengthy 2015 interrogation.
If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.
Justice for Men & Boys 
He was ” her third husband”.
That was the clue that should have warned him off.
As for her claim that he wanted all sorts of “sexual stuff”, apart from the victim blaming, she will have used that to hook him in, in the first place.
Her admission that she was “ok with that” (his death) and that she was “euphoric” as he drowned shows – were there still any doubt – that she’s a psychopath.
So where’s the protection for victim No. four?
LikeLike
I’d like to think that at some not too distant point the particular type of man inclined to policing is going to wake up and smell the coffee, and then say to himself ‘why bother’ and then say to his superiors ‘I’m no longer inclined to do your dirty work’. Sadly, I’m too old and too hairy in the tooth to believe in Father Christmas or Tooth Fairies, and I know that leopards cannot change their spots, so I know that as sure as eggs are eggs ‘The Police’ will go on taking ‘stunning statements’ from women who have planned the murder of an innocent and unsuspecting man while never questioning what they are doing or why they are doing it.
One hundred years ago, almost, hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions from all sides, of men took part in the lengthy action known as Third Ypres or Passchendaele. That men were prepared to endure and suffer without rebellion is laudable, however, their willing sacrifice might reasonably be thought to suggest that uniforms and the disciplines and cultures attached to them do not encourage dissonant thinking.
LikeLike