Leaked audio shows doctors’ association LYING about effects of circumcision on the penis

Our thanks to Lawrence for this. Of all the arguments used by proponents of MGM, the argument that men appreciate having been circumcised because it reduces the sensitivity of the penis so they ‘last longer’ before orgasm is one of the most absurd. The same argument could be used for women and the more extreme forms of FGM, but I’ve never heard that used as an argument for FGM.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

About Mike Buchanan

I'm a men's human rights advocate, writer, and publisher. My primary focus is leading the political party I launched in 2013, Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them). I still work actively on two campaigns I launched in early 2012, Campaign for Merit in Business and the Anti-Feminism League. In 2014 I launched The Alternative Sexism Project, aiming to raise public understanding that the sexism faced by men and boys has far more grievous consequences than the sexism faced by women and girls.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Lawrence Newman

    When I listen to the recorded discussion, the most striking thing for me is this. Notice how civil the doctors are when they have their twisted logic questioned? When people like me try to explain the damage online, we regularly get abused. If we have the debate in the public arena, these “professionals” have to be civil as they will be held to greater scrutiny due to losing their anonymity.

    They talk of “satisfaction” among circumcised men. What does this even mean? To me, it means a group of pro-mutilation doctors ask a bunch of men who were mutilated at birth “are you satisfied?”. The men say yes because they have no point of comparison,and the doctors then report “circumcision doesn’t affect satisfaction”. This poor methodology is representative of your average study by the pro-mutilation brigade. Like the touch tests in which they touch the glans of circumcised men and intact men, ignore the foreskin, then conclude “circumcision doesn’t affect sexual pleasure” because the already non-erogenous glans is still non-erogenous after foreskin removal.

    It’s quite clear to me that the key to exposing this lunacy is to get men who know what they’re talking about on to the mainstream media to debate this with the pro-mutilation crowd. But the media does its damnedest not to allow this. When you’ve had discussions on TV, like your appearance on This Morning, you’re never given adequate time to expound on your points and really hit a home run; you have to summarise everything very succinctly.

  • Slowcoach

    This is the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) here being referred to.
    – PEDIATRICS note –
    Might one be right in imagining this body is, at least in part, set up to help it’s members make money – if necessary by grievously assaulting very small children who cannot understand or consent to this vile procedure, and inflicting life changing injury upon them for financial gain.
    Seems likely.