I make a big effort to not have my time wasted by deranged feminist bloggers – I know, I know, ‘deranged’ is implied in ‘feminist’ – but every now and then one writes a piece that is so teeth-grindingly absurd, I feel obliged to respond and bring the piece to the attention of the followers of this blog, for the sake of my sanity. One such piece has just come to my attention, on the ‘Drifting Through’ blog – here. It’s titled, ‘Women Are Not Here For You. You Do Not Own Us.’
The website is the creation of an American woman. On her ‘About’ page she writes:
I’m a writer, a mom of three, and a wanna-be groupie (I love to see live music and sometimes it gets excessive.)
I’ve just posted the following comments:
I have only speed-read your piece, life’s too short to do more than that. It was enough. More than enough.
Your website’s strapline is “Welcome to the inner workings of my mind.” The inner workings of your mind have clearly been polluted by feminist ideology and you are therefore predictably narcissistic, delusional, misandrous, angry, miserable, and whiny. Continue to embrace feminism and remain that way if you wish, but don’t expect psychologically healthy people – i.e. non-feminists and anti-feminists – to give a damn.
Have a nice day.
Mike Buchanan
JUSTICE FOR MEN & BOYS
(and the women who love them)
I invite you to contribute your own comments on her piece.
If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.
Justice for Men & Boys 
We don’t own them.
We don’t owe them either!
LikeLike
“No matter how faithless, a wife who files for divorce can count on the state as an ally.”
Bryce Christensen, “The Strange Politics of Child Support,” Society, vol. 39, no. 1 (November-December 2001), p. 65.
LikeLike
Christensen was a very was right in 2001 and even more so today. If you go into family courts against a woman anywhere in the western world you will lose.
LikeLike
“mathsisshite says:
May 6, 2017 at 10:59 am
While this is the inner workings of your mind, it’s not the inner workings of the average woman’s mind. You, like all feminists, fail to take female psychology–which is very different from male psychology–into account.
The best way I can communciate to you how your analysis is flawed is to cite you an example from my younger years when I would go out to pubs and clubs at the weekend. I’ve been in situations with women where the woman in question would make it obivous she was attracted to me via body language but then played hard to get.
In one case, the woman got into my taxi and came home with me, even though she had a boyfriend. I was actually way too drunk to do anything and, to be frank, she bored me. As I was preparing to go to sleep, she said, “I’m not going to have sex with you, Lawrence!” I replied, “Well that’s fine by me because I don’t want to have sex.” To which she replied, “Okay, I’ll sleep with you but as long as you don’t tell my boyfriend!”
I shook my head and went to sleep. The next night, while out clubbing/pubbing again, my best friend told her friends what she’d done and said. She was outraged that I’d had the audacity to tell my best friend a funny story about a silly, disloyal and promicuous moron. She got hysterical hysterical and attacked me, ripping my shirt right down the back. Later that night I was in a nightclub and another woman came out of nowhere and put her hand down my trousers and grabbed my penis. I have other stories like this. It’s almost as if these women think they owned me, or maybe men in general.
Just a little anecdote to show you how utterly mad women can be. I understand they’re irrational and I can live with it because I’m a biological determinist. What I can’t live with is people like you denying that women engage in these silly games and are actually straightforward, logical and rational people. They are not. And deep down, I suspect you know that.”
If you’re wondering where my username came from …..
Always makes me laugh. Scots actually put that into Westminster.
LikeLike
You’re right.
Life IS too short for more than that.
I didn’t so much speed read, as ‘block clock’ it myself!
A point by point rebuttal and deconstruction of the inherent falacies therein would be straight forward.
But it’s much easier to let the rant expose her sad resentment and insecurity for itself.
She is telling us that she feels rejected and unwanted, and so will return the dis-favour – with interest.
A pity femarxism has made her so unhappy.
But then weaponising human weaknesses and insecurities is it’s bitterly cruel purpose and speciality.
One can but hope she eventually gets better – living with the grief of unfulfilled hopes and desires is such a waste.
LikeLike
Meanwhile in the real world….http://metro.co.uk/2017/05/04/woman-jailed-for-horrific-campaign-of-domestic-violence-against-fiance-6614996/
LikeLike
The “live music” and “groupie” reference should have been a tip off that this is an attention-whore of the first order. The kind who wears clothes designed to get attention, then complains when she gets it. Women live for these dramas while men build the world. I make it a point never to even look at these overly made-up, aging former club sl*ts.
But that said…I want to go on record as saying the “live music” crowd gets on my nerves because ROCK MUSIC SUCKS!!! It can only be listened to ironically or nostalgically. They sold us suburbanites a false bill of goods with stupid rock music. The soul music of 1963-69 is the real deal. If I had access to the history of soul, like I do now through the Web, I’d have never listened to rock.
LikeLike
That’s probably the most rock ‘n’ roll statement I’ve heard.
I agree with you first paragraph entirely.
But the 2nd – blasphemy!
You shall be pinned to a 4×12 cabinet and have the cranked tones of a vintage plexi blasted through your body until you submit.
Until then…rock on.
🙂
LikeLike
HA! “Hey hey my my. Rock and Roll will never die!
LikeLike
Pure vomit but at least the comments were entertaining.
LikeLike