Appalling. Liz Truss, the Injustice Secretary, is no better than her predecessors at not admitting that the obvious solution to prison overcrowding is to send far fewer men to prison. As William Collins pointed out – here – if men were sentenced as leniently as women, five out of six men in British prisons wouldn’t be there. But the government has no interest in gender equality if the beneficiaries would be men or boys, even when one consequence would be far lower costs for the taxpayer to meet.
If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

And they are talking about gender equality, democracy and justice…. I suppose if you label the natural traits and behaviour of one gender as fundamentaly criminal, instead of normal and natural, you are going to need a lot of prisons to deal with all the males in the society. The big question is who are all these male traitors complicit in this crooked legislation, which basically amounts to a crime against manhood… We know all the feminists are guilty of it. But the biggest blame lies with their male collaborators.
LikeLike
“But the biggest blame lies with their male collaborators” Yes I think this is the crux of the “political” problem that the feminist “noise” is so quickly turned into policy. And the feminists are correct in one respect men are still the majority in most decision making arenas. It is their “gentlemanly” eagerness to simply enact stuff since the 70s that has brought us to the position we are in. After all there are all sorts of vociferous special interests but the feminist lobby appears completely unchallenged in its ridiculous assertions etc. “Ladies First”
LikeLike
And of course Ms Truss herself is a beneficiary of positive discrimination. The South Norfolk constituency association would have been allowed to deselect a male PPC in 2010; they were forced to retain her.
She does not enjoy the confidence much less the respect of the legal profession
LikeLike
Men and jails…
Some men are genuinely relentlessly dangerous to others.
Some men are hostile, exploitative, abusive, and therefore a threat to those they would target when the opportunity arises.Yes feminists, you are occasionally right in your assessments. But that is not the complete picture
The same statement can be repeated replacing the word ‘woman’. Admittedly, however, men are more potentially dangerous than most women (as individuals) as a result of their size and strength. Men tend also instinctively to pursue their objectives with more blatant aggression than women and unfortunately when those ambitions are unethical crime tends to follow. Men are proactive with their aggression and hostility. Women are passive with theirs. Men are easier to identify as wrong doers…
Sadly there are many young men in ‘our’ society who can be identified as having dangerous, anti-social, opportunistic, non-ethical attitudes and potential to do harm. I have worked with a few and they are not to be trusted. However, the cure for this nasty reality is not a new set of 10000 6’x8′ cells with a lock on the outside.The cure for this unacceptable ‘state’ of affairs is for men ourselves to create a stronger brotherhood. We are being divided and misled and misused. We need to recognise that fact and cover each others backs, and to set high standards of conduct among ourselves in regard to ourselves and each other.
The reality is that in this increasingly opportunistic and corrupted society there are those who have realised…. you can make good money locking other people up.
There are undoubtedly those in government with invested interests forming comfortable mutually beneficial business relationships with those who are prepared to build the walls, the fences, the cells and the infrastructure to incarcerate people… most of whom are men.. (most of who’s lives neither you or I would be able to tolerate let alone wish on another). These government officials would have us believe it’s about maintaining the ‘good’ and containing the ‘bad’. They are lying.
Some individuals and groups are benefitting from the conflict and confusion that is being stoked in our country and beyond.Those who snap under the pressure are inevitably and institutionally branded ‘criminal’ and become a cash cow for those who watch the chaos from the leather seats, as the cash rolls in. It’s not just about the ‘good’ and the ‘bad’… it also features the ugly truth which usually hides behind a businessman’s shirt and tie.
The push towards a greater Brotherhood among men is increasingly important.
We need to communicate, network, support, encourage, and enable each other as men and boys. We are being duped. Without that solidarity we become scattered sheep sharing a field with psychopathic wolves in sheep’s clothing.
Think of the blokes around you. Think of the lads you know in your neighbourhood. Show them Respect and increased respect for themselves will follow. Talk about what Respect is, what it looks like, what it sounds like…
Let the tyrants build their jails. Let them fit the locks on the doors. Let them gift wrap the lot with barbed wire.. and let’s stand together as a Brotherhood of men have those ‘facilities’ standing empty as a costly remainder of a wasted cynical investment.
The boot must be placed on the other foot and we are not a commodity to be exploited. We cannot trust the courts. It is clear that as ordinary men we cannot trust the feminist liberal-marxist agenda of contemporary authority.
It is time, as men, to invest in ourselves and to trust in each other because ‘divide and conquer’ isn’t a new strategy, and we should all know that by now.
Sdk
LikeLike
There is money to be made from the incaceration of others. There are some men and women in this society who are happy to remove the liberty of others. These individuals do not seek to improve society and individual lives but to make use of the difficulties and errors of others. Private security companies on the streets replacing police officers?… Private security firms managing detention facilities and prisons..?. It’s all good for business if you’re in the business…
It makes sense, though, if you think about it. If you develope and encourage a societal norm which demonises men then you are inevitably going to need more secure facilities in which to store them. It human logistics.. warehouses for miscreants.
The man haters do not rest. They scheme and connive with relentless intent. And the feminist misandry they preach is a shared mantra which actually exploits the stupidity of the feminists it appears to favour. Forgive them Lord.. they know not what they do…
Sdk
LikeLike
when you think about it, there is little reason one should want to live in a ‘civilized’ society like that. Seems like the more ‘civilized’, the more evil it becomes….
LikeLike
Marty.. yes exactly… this is how judgemental Political Correctness works.. it is the softly softly march towards a totalitarian regime.
“We’re doing it for the good of everyone!!” they say…
..”.but don’t you dare challenge me or else!!!…”
The feminist face of fascism.. the Trojan Horse, welcomed in through a genuine desire to be fair.. These are difficult times and many people are being duped…
LikeLike
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39370689 I wouldn’t normally welcome an Act requiring spending money. But this extends some limited responsibility to homeless people who don’t qualify for assistance “not just those protected under existing laws”. Working age males in other words. A step forward.
LikeLike