5 thoughts on “The divine stupidity of the Rt Rev Rachel Treweek, Bishop of Gloucester

  1. It may be neccessary for women to invent a new religion,where The Mother,the Daughter and the Holy spirit call the shots. It may also be neccessary for women to abandon home-making,accept being drafted to the military in times of war,and start being as creative as men are. it may be neccessary for women to become as sharp in science and maths as men are,oterwise we will fall behind the competition in this world market economy. That;s the price of equality !
    apart from becoming housewives again, the only alternative is to create a command economy,where 2+2 does not have to equal 4,and which will accommodate women’s shortcomings…
    Which way will it be then dear ladies?

    Like

    • I think there should be gender equality amongst the ranks of grave diggers, cesspit cleaners and long distance lorry drivers. Why are there no Twitter storms or feminist research projects in connection with these obvious slights against the fairer sex?

      Like

  2. Has anyone asked the good bishop whether she still considers her religion’s ‘Devil’ to be male? It’s just that, well, if the ‘Devil’ isn’t male then how do lady bishops with an obvious albeit politically-muted taste for feminism explain the innate rottenness of this character? The Devil is bad and so can’t be considered female, and yet isn’t above criticism and so can’t be transgendered either but that only leaves not identifying with the gender binary which would mean non-masculine and therefore good. I’m confused. They’re still sure about Jesus, Mary and Joseph, right? I mean it was still a nuclear family wasn’t it, just with a bit of supernatural hanky-panky…

    Like

Leave a reply to Sean44SS (@Sean44SS) Cancel reply