Kathy Gyngell: ‘Feminists escalate the sex wars. They will make men come to hate women.’

An insightful new piece. It is, of course, a testament to men’s natural resistance to misogyny, that in the face of decade after decade of assaults from feminists in government and elsewhere, so few men are misogynous – while many women are misandrous, including all feminists. The notion that men in general are misogynous – articulated most famously by Germaine Greer in The Female Eunuch (1970) – is simply a projection by misandrous women.

About Mike Buchanan

I'm a men's human rights advocate, writer, and publisher. My primary focus is leading the political party I launched in 2013, Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them). I still work actively on two campaigns I launched in early 2012, Campaign for Merit in Business and the Anti-Feminism League. In 2014 I launched The Alternative Sexism Project, aiming to raise public understanding that the sexism faced by men and boys has far more grievous consequences than the sexism faced by women and girls.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Ms. Greer was one of those , following in the wake of Betty Friedan et al., who called housework “make work”. In that it was easy and increasingly light due to modern appliances and caused women to be so bored they developed neuroses. So decades on we can be sure it is even lighter work and yet it’s an “issue”. Odd that doing the same sort of tasks on an industrial scale is usually a male “preserve” not least because so often it is work done in “un social” hours. The modern face of misandry appears no different from the entitled disdain aristocratic ladies had for their minions.

  • epistemol

    Of course they will make men come to hate women, that is their aim and purpose.
    Modern feminism is cultural Marxism. Since economic Marxism so disastrously failed, they are now trying again with a different approach.

    Their technique is to find an existing fault line in society and then lever it open ever wider.
    Why is this attack so grievous? Marxism v 1.0 attempted to set the ‘workers’ against the ‘capitalists’.
    This failed in the West because it was insufficiently focused.
    Anyone with job was a worker, but if that work came with a pension or provided savings or investments, then they were also capitalists – if not directly then indirectly. However everyone IS either a man OR a woman, so Femarxism v 2.0 is much more precisely aimed.

    When I refer to Femarxism, I do not refer to a dastardly secret Russian plot, so much as a highly politicised grab at power – the universal and ubiquitous desire, and darkside of human nature since the year dot.

    So far so unremarkable. What is so remarkable is the reluctance of men to fight back or even defend themselves, demonstrating in and of itself the fallacy of misandristic allegations about ‘violence’ and ‘oppression’. If That is what men had in mind, I think we’d all know all about it by now.

    So please realise that Femarxism is not in the business of leaving men alone.

    They will continue to crank up the injustice until they provoke a terrible schism that will damage society so severely that there will be a power vacuum into which they can then step.

    This is the plan.

    All the gullible idiots who really believe they are fighting for ‘equality’, both male and female, will be cast aside and discarded like empty wrappers, their job done. And they better keep quiet about their complicity, any who complain too loudly that they’ve been cheated will be among the first to go up against the wall.

    Ultimately such infamy is likely to fail.
    Brought down by it’s own corruption.
    But I cannot say how long this will take, or how much damage and suffering it will cause before then.
    The old Soviet Union lasted thee score years and ten. A human lifetime.
    Femarxists care not a jot about this. The end will justify the means. Always a warning about what is in store for us by those who would be our masters.

    This, of course applies to both men and women, for we have all known, haven’t we, since early
    childhood that ” When Jack fell down and broke his crown, Jill came tumbling after “.