Here we go again. Man presumed guilty until proven innocent.

Appalling. Given this woman’s known background – she falsely alleged she’d been raped by Neil and Christine Hamilton, and served a prison sentence as a result – the assumption of the part of the criminal justice system that her ex-boyfriend was guilty of threatening her with a Samurai sword was deplorable. He was imprisoned and denied bail. Why does the justice system bow to the will of such women? At least she’s serving a custodial sentence. Doubtless she’ll serve only a small proportion of the sentence before she’s released to assault yet more men’s lives.

About Mike Buchanan

I'm a men's human rights advocate, writer, and publisher. My primary focus is leading the political party I launched in 2013, Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them). I still work actively on two campaigns I launched in early 2012, Campaign for Merit in Business and the Anti-Feminism League. In 2014 I launched The Alternative Sexism Project, aiming to raise public understanding that the sexism faced by men and boys has far more grievous consequences than the sexism faced by women and girls.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Quote from the article:Her claims that he had access to weapons and was likely to resist arrest sparked the costly armed response.

    I’m sure that she was hoping that he would resist arrest and be shot.

    Evil woman but she’ll no doubt be out in a couple of years.

  • epistemol

    It IS appalling, but one has to bear in mind that DPP Kier Starmer and replacement Alison Saunders (who publicly said she wanted more ‘convictions’, not more ‘justice’, mind) – femarxists both – are only pursuing their own corrupt policies, so one should not be too surprised. When these fail to deliver, the next step will be to prevent the proper investigation that eventually proved this defendant not guilty. See if I’m not right.