Suzanne Moore calls for the launch of a feminist party

Harriet Harman is without doubt the most over-promoted politician of her generation. Reflecting on some of her recent witterings, Suzanne Moore of the Guardian is calling for the launch of a feminist party – here. What on earth could a feminist party seek, which isn’t already being delivered – or promised – by the Conservatives, Labour and Lib Dems? All three parties (when in power) relentlessly advantage women and girls, and disadvantage men and boys, at the behest of feminists. Just not enough, it seems. Never enough.

On the bright side, if such a party were to be launched, the mainstream media might look for an anti-feminist party to debate with their spokespeople. J4MB is the only political party in Britain – indeed, the only one in the English-speaking world – in a position to meet that challenge.

About Mike Buchanan

I'm a men's human rights advocate, writer, and publisher. My primary focus is leading the political party I launched in 2013, Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them). I still work actively on two campaigns I launched in early 2012, Campaign for Merit in Business and the Anti-Feminism League. In 2014 I launched The Alternative Sexism Project, aiming to raise public understanding that the sexism faced by men and boys has far more grievous consequences than the sexism faced by women and girls.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Yes, it would not be entirely a bad thing. It would provide a context in which to point out how vile feminism is, as Mike notes. It would also split the feminist vote – since the other three major parties are already feminist. But as for “what could they demand that they haven’t already got” I have the following nightmarish thoughts: (I)making anti-feminist speech illegal, (ii)setting up correction camps for people (i.e., men or boys) with incorrect opinions, (iii)making the teaching of feminist theory part of the primary school national curriculum. Far fetched? The first two of these feature in the EU proposal “The European framework national statute for the promotion of tolerance” whilst the third is virtually what the lovely Yvette Cooper-Balls proposed last Sunday in The Independent

  • As Rick points out the feminist party exists. It is the Labour Party . Be in no doubt if they are re elected Gender feminism is what we’ll get. The correction camps will in fact be our school system. The ridiculously inflated claims of “violence” ( which appears to be inclusive of vulgarity and gauche) will be used to put puff behind the VAWG strategy and the Equality Act’s “positive action”. As in your previous piece on University applications the education system is already failing boys, Labour will make it toxic to them. While I agree Con and Lib Dem are not much better they have little of the Stalinist energy of a red Labour party.
    On a brighter point I saw La Harman’s interview on Newsnight. She rather foolishly showed clearly why she wasn’t made deputy PM by clearly being a one issue politician .

  • vadark

    “(iii)making the teaching of feminist theory part of the primary school national curriculum. Far fetched?”

    You’re right, Rick, but they already do this and it’s done in a very covert style.

  • I heard this on Radio 4 driving home. It was another fact free discussion peppered with the usual axiomatic statements of gender feminist theory and agenda. The way in which is was taken seriously that women are discriminated against far more than men in the current society was just mind blowingly insane. They kept saying especially young women are concerned about this and the political feminists where inpatient to help them. Then they went on to claimed women being made redundant from civil service jobs due to cut backs was an attack on women’s rights. The fact that more men are unemployed did not get a mention at all. The “Feminist Youth” scheme Yvette Cooper-Balls proposes shows the gender-feminist ambition knows no bounds. It falsely relates sex education to gender feminist behaviour control of boys and their alleged gender based violence. Teaching girls that only they count and boys are just there to please them is so unhealthy and stupid. They should be teaching mutual respect not total lock down of boys as human beings. This has been a bad week for Labour, in my eyes, as it now clearly marks them out as completely in the control of the feminists. It should be just renamed the Women’s Social Workers party as they no longer represent men at all. They have had my vote in the past but that is now looking impossible. I cannot support any party that is looking to destroy society.

  • I listened to Moore being interviewed about this on Radio 4.

    She was asked what such a party would do and she seemed completely stumped by the question and said that she didn’t know.

    Typical feminist idiot, running her mouth with her brain in neutral.

  • The formation of a feminist party would be a good thing IMHO.

    For one thing, it would bring the whole shebang out into the open where it could be engaged, policy-by-policy: its statistics put under forensic scutiny, and its society-splitting agenda exposed for what it really is.

    For another, it would split the womens’ vote of the main parties and weaken them at the ballot box. That would concentrate the minds of their leaders and followers and precipitate the search for support from men and from balanced women who are also suffering from feminism (their sons being disadvantaged in education, having their male natures pathologised by rabid feminists in schools, being put at severe risk of rape allegations at university; their brothers deprived of their kids, and their homes, by the courts, and so on).

    The formation of a feminist political party would free up the political agenda and remove the slavish kowtowing of the parties to the women’s vote allowing them to adopt policies based on common sense and the good of all, rather than this overly powerful women’s movement, and drive political policy in a new direction. It would also split the Labour Party’s vote and cause it to realise the entryist nature of feminism and what Tony Blair and his feminists ‘Babes’ (plus ‘er indoors of course!) did to it.

    Bring it on is what I say. I look forward to the day when democracy can get its teeth into this vile, behind-the-scenes ideology and expose it for what it really is – a Marxist infiltation into the entire political system whose intent is to destroy men’s power in society, especially fatherhood (which is the real meaning of patriarchy), marriage as the basic building block of democratic, capitalist society, and place an elite of highly ideologically motivated, highly dangerous women in the seats of power in our land (both politically and in wider society, such as business), from where they can conform us all to a new social order, based on their own twisted ideas of ‘equality’ – which really means superiority of women .

    Just look at Yvette Cooper’s latest pronouncement for proof of that. She is inviting the creation of a system in which boys are indoctrinated into an ideology whose sole intent is men’s subjugation. Now that really is evil. What Karen Woodhall said was right on the nail. Here is a woman speaking the truth with guts and precision. Thank God!:

    ‘Women like you have created a world in which educating boys to be ashamed of their masculinity is seen as desirable instead of cruel and about equality instead of what it is, an oppressive, discriminatory reality. As parents and grandparents, practitioners and ordinary people, we will hold you to account for your crimes against our children and our grandchildren. I hope I stay alive long enough to see the day.’

    Well, amen to that. I do too. I would dance for joy to see a series of trials of these child-abusers, caught in the same web of hysteria they are currently creating; where a man no longer dare touch a child in love, tenderness, compassion, and fatherly care.

    So, bring it on. Let the likes of Cooper and Harman and their fellow-travelers encourage the formation of a Feminist Party, and support it – perhaps even head it? Then we will get feminism out onto a battlefield where it can be engaged and finally defeated.

  • Pingback: United Kingdom Suzanne Moore calls for the launch of a feminist party()

  • Will men be allowed to join the feminist party or are they going to discriminate against men? I wonder if they’ll have men only short lists ?

  • The selfish backstabbing should be a real treat to watch unfurl too