I’m still going through the emails sent to me whilst I was away in Detroit, so I was interested to read this perceptive piece written by Paul Elam and published before my return to the UK. It contains some material on the article he expected from Jessica Roy, a Time journalist, in the light of her tweets during the conference. We put up a link to the piece a few hours ago. I’ve just read it for a second time. I don’t think I’ve ever read an article packed with so many misrepresentations and unwarranted assertions. If I hadn’t personally met the woman, I’d swear she hadn’t attended the event, but picked up a few morsels from a particularly vile feminist infiltrator at the conference.
I would like to think that no MHRA gets involved in any ad hominem exchange. It is simply not worth the expenditure of time and energy. We should simply stick to presenting the facts.
LikeLike
Sean, I take your point, but Jessica Roy’s article was so packed with mistakes and misleading statements I’m personally pleased Paul called her out. She clearly had no intention of writing a balanced report from the outset.
LikeLike