Earlier today we posted a piece about how the disloyal temporary PA of Richard Scudamore, the Premier League chief executive, sent some of his obviously private emails to the media… and is now seeking £150,000 compensation from the Premier League. As we often say, you couldn’t make this s*** up. The ever-insightful Herbert Purdy has just posted some comments on the piece (below), which once again are worthy of a blog piece. The man really should write a book. I might suggest the idea to him. Maybe LPS publishing could publish it. In the meantime, enjoy:
“Women like this are so steeped in what they believe is their moral obligation to root out every instance of the social ‘offence’ of sexism, something they see everywhere and in everything, and which only feminism has declared is offensive. They truly believe they are justified in this sort of behaviour, it is astonishing really.
Ms Abraham has not only lost all vestige of any claim she might have had to integrity in her work, she will undoubtedly find that her ideologically driven actions will prevent her finding employment in the future. How can she not see that trust is so easily lost, and her beliefs are no excuse for such unspeakable irresponsibility?
These women really believe they are right to put their ideology before their contractual and ethical duty. That is what feminism is doing to women, it is robbing them of their human agency and their moral fibre. What world do we now live in that women can be like this?
Ms Abraham is an adult, deemed to have agency, and she exercised that agency in what she did, so she must be accountable. Yet she seems to believe she is justified sufficiently in what she did to seek punitive damages. In other words, she wants to punish those whom she has first punished, betrayed, and damaged. She has shown no moral scruple, yet she believes she is entitled to compensation, presumably in the belief that she acted in a just cause. No she did not. Feminism’s crusade against alleged sexism is not a just cause.
Feminism has induced women to believe that they have rights to equality, and, in that endeavour, no responsibility to exercise even the most basic of human responsibilities. This woman has destroyed her own personal integrity, which is precious beyond jewels, as she will no doubt now realise.
Her chances of ever being considered worthy of getting any job in which trust, discretion and integrity are implicit have been blown to pieces – by her. She has tarred herself with the brush of being seen as a feminist subversive who will ‘out’ any boss who does not toe the line of her ideology. Now who would employ a woman like that? How duped these women are!
I think Mike Buchanan’s point is well made. It is undoubtedly getting to the stage where to be a feminist woman in a position of trust in an organisation is to be seen as a potential subversive, and, therefore, better to select a man and be safe.”
