Rachel Johnson: ‘Jilly is right, we SHOULD be nicer to our men – if only for one little reason.’

A dreadful piece by Rachel Johnson – Boris Johnson’s sister – in the last edition of Mail on Sunday. If you harbour even the slightest doubt that as far as women are concerned, men’s value as human beings is defined by their utility to women, this should open your eyes:


From the final paragraph:

For despite out looming supremacy, kindness to men remains crucially important, not because we’ve won and should be magnanimous in victory, but because women still love, and want, and need, men – who give them love, and sex, and babies, and much more. It is in our interests to be nicer to men.


About Mike Buchanan

I'm a men's human rights advocate, writer, and publisher. My primary focus is leading the political party I launched in 2013, Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them). I still work actively on two campaigns I launched in early 2012, Campaign for Merit in Business and the Anti-Feminism League. In 2014 I launched The Alternative Sexism Project, aiming to raise public understanding that the sexism faced by men and boys has far more grievous consequences than the sexism faced by women and girls.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Nick diPerna

    How kind of her… She forgot to mention ‘productivity’ as another one of our many ‘utilities’.

    Imagine if the article said, “we should be nicer to blacks because of all the good services they provide”, or “we should be nicer to women because they have nice boobs”…