Gaby Hinsliff, 53, is a Guardian ‘columnist’ and ‘journalist’. Our thanks to Nigel for Hinsliff’s piece published three months ago (like many Guardian pieces, it’s 3-5x longer than it needs to be). He writes:

“This illustrates why the ‘left’ have literally no idea. They simply cannot address the actual issues as seen by ordinary people, full stop. In a sense long may this complete blindness continue because it creates a huge open goal for Reform. To be frank Reform don’t have to come up with any policies, just being the only party even interested in young men is pretty revolutionary.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Outrageous. Extracts:

“An English punk band has sparked outrage from Israel after they led chants of “death to the IDF” during their Glastonbury set broadcast on the BBC.

Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, has ordered Tim Davie, the Corperation’s director-general, to explain why the performance by Bob Vylan was streamed on iPlayer…

Performing on the West Holts Stage just half an hour before Kneecap, Bob Vylan used their platform to make a series of political statements — including vocal support for Palestine amid Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza…

The moment that drew the strongest reaction came when frontman Bobby Vylan led the crowd in chanting ‘death, death to the IDF’ — referring to the Israel Defense Forces — alongside the slogan ‘from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.’

The chant was taken up by thousands of Worthy Farm festival-goers, many of whom were waving Palestinian flags.”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

At the request of a generous donor, herewith Jess Phillips’s woeful maiden speech (video, 5:38) from 2015, including (from 1:38) these words:

“After university, I had the misfortune of having two children who are both sons, incidentally.”

Check out the gurning female MPs hanging onto every idiotic sentence. The “misfortune” was surely that of her sons and husband, having this misandrous harridan for a mother and wife.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

A recent piece (£) in The Spectator. Louise Henton is in charge of RAF Brize Norton, the base where Palestine Action protesters recently broke unnoticed through the permieter fence to cause millions of pounds worth of damage to Voyager jet engines. She has spent her time in the RAF working in HR (Human Remains). In 2019 she wrote this in an essay for Air and Space Power Review:

“Personality traits such as patriotism and bravery are viewed as desirable within the military. This often encourages overt masculine behaviour amongst its members, therefore stepping outside the norm and challenging the group is often looked down upon and difficult to do.

The task-focused approach can also lead to corners being cut if it is deemed that the ends justify the means, that certain actions or behaviours are tolerated if they achieve the desired result. The danger with this is that such undesirable behaviours, [J4MB: Note the passive-aggressive imperiousness here. She judges the behaviours “undesirable”… so they are, because women are never wrong.] if tolerated for long enough, become the norm and the level of standards gradually erodes… Methods of bonding and creating team cohesiveness within the military often involve pranks and banter, but this isolates those who are different to the norm.” [J4MB: She means women.]

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Interesting (video, 15 seconds). The poster of the tweet, “Men are Human”, captioned the video with this:

“The assumption is always that you [J4MB: He’s addressing women.] can be violent to men because they aren’t allowed to respond. Abusing this dynamic is how you end up with this.”

Being by nature risk-averse, women tend to confine their violence towards men (and towards women and children) to the domestic sphere. The Partner Abuse State of Knowledge Project (PASK13) was published in May 2013 in the journal Partner Abuse and is the most comprehensive review of domestic violence research ever carried out. This unparallelled three-year research project was conducted by 42 scholars at 20 universities and research centres. The headline finding of the PASK review was that:

“Men and women perpetrate physical and non-physical forms of abuse at comparable rates, most domestic violence is mutual, women are as controlling as men, domestic violence by men and women is correlated with essentially the same risk factors, and male and female perpetrators are motivated for similar reasons.”

A key numerical result from the PASK review was:

“Among large population samples, 57.9% of intimate-partner violence (IPV) reported was bi-directional, 42.1% unidirectional, 13.8% of the unidirectional violence was male-to-female, 28.3% was female-to-male.”

The last point is worth emphasising. In the 42.1% of (heterosexual) couples in which one partner is always the perpetrator and the other the victim, the woman is TWICE as likely to be the perpetrator and (therefore) HALF as likely to be the victim.

A few of the many comments in response to the tweet:

“God put that log right next to him.”

“Women wanted equality so here it is.”

“This is when men take back power from the feminist bullshit!”

“Blame our father‘s generation for letting these women think they are the same as men.”

“…but did she learn anything from this interaction?”

“I was horrified to see a classmate beating the shit out of her fiance one day. I’ve never forgotten.”

“In the last 15 – 20 years the entire education system, every book, every movie, every TV show, every game, the media, and everything else you can imagine has taught women they are our equal physically. This is just one example of so many videos out there just like it. They believe it.”

“How did she not dodge that?”

“Don’t bring a stick to a branch fight.”

“Equal rights and equal lefts? Or maybe we could treat each other with respect? Nah, pass the popcorn, it’s fun watching feminists get what they fought for.”

“Knocked the feminism right out of her. cuuuuurakkkkku!”

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

An excellent interview (£) of our next prime minister by Caroline Wheeler, political editor of The Times, in Farage’s “unofficial office”, Boisdale in Belgravia. Farage has an excellent team of young social media experts working for him, and we learn from this interview that he has more TikTok followers than the other 649 MPs combined.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Interesting.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Today’s video is here (2:54).

Over a period of almost six months we’re posting links to one video daily from the comedy channel of our associated award-winning website, Laughing at Feminists. Remember, it’s more than important to laugh at feminists, it’s a civic duty.  

You might also be interested in the 700+ videos on our YouTube channel, which includes our media appearances since 2012, 300+ videos of talks and other materials from the International Conferences on Men’s Issues (2014 – ), from the other men’s issues conferences we’ve been involved with, and so much more. The individual conference playlists are here.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our thanks to cp for this in Metro. He writes:

“In GB, anyone who dares to call out blatant feminist policy will immediately be tagged with labels of increasing social discredit. Backward…. hateful…. extremist…. terrorist. They tried very hard for that ultimate conflation. There’s no nuance, no discussion. The feminist ministers responsible would do well to examine the motivations of their own hateful ideology. What we have presently bears no resemblance to ‘equality’. It’s thought control from the Ministry of Truth.”

Extracts from the Metro piece:

“Under the plans, teachers would be legally required to refer students who are showing signs of extreme misogynistic views to the national counter-terror programme Prevent.

The local authority and police would then assess them to find out if they require deradicalisation.

Currently, the Home Office’s list of extremism categories includes ‘incel’ – a shortening of ‘involuntary celibate’, which describes a form of violent hatred towards woman by men who feel rejected by them due to a sense of entitlement… [J4MB: No, they “feel rejected by them” because… er… they ARE rejected by them.]

Asked if the move to change the approach to misogyny could threaten free speech, government minister Jess Phillips told LBC: ‘You just use the exact same test you would with far-right extremism and Islamism, wouldn’t you. The same test would have to apply. [J4MB: The irony of a woman driven by visceral misandry coming out with such BS.]

‘People can hold views about women all they like, but it’s not OK any more to ignore the massive growing threat caused by online hatred towards women and for us to ignore it because we’re worried about the line, rather than making sure the line is in the right place as we would do with any other extremist ideology.’ “

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

Excellent.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.