If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Good news to start the day. Melanie Dawes has been the Chief Executive of Ofcom since 2020. From her Wikipedia page:
“She was the Civil Service Gender Champion from 2015 to 2019, when she was appointed as the overall Civil Service Diversity and Inclusion Champion. She was a judge for the 2015 Civil Service Diversity and Inclusion Awards.”
She should be fired for the GB News legal challenge and the organisation’s scandalous failure to hold the BBC to account over its left-wing bias and anti-Israel coverage. But the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport is Lisa Nandy, who will have no problem with the left-wing bias, and women are reluctant to fire women.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
An interesting discussion (video, 1:08:15) between Peterson and David French, a former Army veteran, and a self-declared evangelical Christian conservative. The video description:
“Sparked by French’s recent New York Times article, “The Democrats’ $20 Million Man Problem,” he and Jordan Peterson discuss the societal failures contributing to male alienation—fatherlessness, loss of purpose, overmedication, and a culture that increasingly pathologizes masculinity. French shares personal insights as a father, veteran, and conservative commentator (who is regularly published in Liberal outlets), and the two expand on themes of demoralization, the need for intentional rites of passage, and the psychological appeal of figures like Andrew Tate. The conversation closes with a stark agreement—we urgently need to reach young men with empathy, structure, and a meaningful vision for life.”
Astonishingly, no references are made to feminism and feminists, or male disadvantaging being the inevitable consequence of female privileging. The talk is all about alleviating the suffering of young men and boys, with no exploration of what is causing that suffering in the first place (other than left-wing female teachers, in the case of boys).
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
An excellent piece (£) in the new edition of The Spectator, prompted by “a young man who goes by the name of Montgomery Toms (who) attended a Pride parade” wearing a sandwich board stating (symbolically) that transgenderism is a mental illness. Murray continues:
“This is a tactic pioneered by an American man known as ‘Billboard Chris’, because his name is Chris and he wears a billboard. Chris’s schtick is to walk around with a sign saying things like ‘Children cannot consent to puberty blockers’. For making such inflammatory statements, Billboard Chris has been detained in a number of jurisdictions, largely because severely deranged people tend to flock around him when he wears this billboard, screaming abuse and showing that they are in no way mentally deranged.”
The line “Children cannot consent to puberty blockers” prompted the thought that the same applies, of course, to MGM. I therefore posted some lengthy comments on the matter, as is my custom, and some interesting exchanges resulted, here.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Our thanks to Sue Parker Hall for pointing us to a piece by Stefan Imeson, a psychotherapist. The related crowdfunder to buy a boxing ring and equipment for a community space in Peckham is here. The target is £10,000 and £8,830 has so far been raised.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
A piece on the BBC website. As we’d expect from the BBC, the headline makes no mention of the sex of the teacher, or that alleged victims were of both sexes:
“Teacher accused of child sex offences granted bail”
The Telegraph (£) covers the story, and – despite a mention in the article that one of the alleged victims was a boy – has a headline that references only the female victims:
“Female PE teacher sexually abused schoolgirls, court told”
Also this in the article:
“During the short hearing, Ms James, wearing a cream two-piece outfit…”.
Can you imagine the following if the alleged abuser were a man?
“During the short hearing, Mr James, wearing a dark blue suit…”.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
At J4MB we like to go the extra mile to bring informative content to our followers. Two short videos, Other Wife v Filipina Wife (Pt.2) (40 seconds) and Things Irish and American people say differently (1:30).
Have a nice day.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Today’s video is here (4:32). Students from the Cambridge University Noisy Twats Society – the acronym seemed appropriate – tried (but failed) to prevent Elizabeth Hobson and I speaking, massed outside the lecture building, banging on saucepans and chanting songs with lines like, “There are many, many more of us than you!”
Over a period of almost six months we’re posting links to one video daily from the comedy channel of our associated award-winning website, Laughing at Feminists. Remember, it’s more than important to laugh at feminists, it’s a civic duty.
You might also be interested in the 700+ videos on our YouTube channel, which includes our media appearances since 2012, 300+ videos of talks and other materials from the International Conferences on Men’s Issues (2014 – ), from the other men’s issues conferences we’ve been involved with, and so much more. The individual conference playlists are here.
—————————-
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Another excellent piece from Nuzzo. I note that the author of the second study, Connor MacMillan, is not an academic but a Canadian PhD student in the Sociology Department of York University, the same university about which in 2015 we wrote the piece Gormless Feminists of the Month: 191 academics, students, and alumni, at York University. The 191 people signed an open letter and prevented recognition of International Men’s Day by the university.
Nuzzo writes:
“Sadly, just like the white adolescents in Dull’s study on “white ignorance,” these fathers were never given a fair chance to have their views taken seriously. Instead of analyzing the interviews inductively—letting themes emerge organically from participants’ words—MacMillan began with feminist theoretical assumptions and forced the fathers’ testimonies into that framework. He acknowledged this explicitly: “I applied a feminist epistemological lens to analyse and make meaning of these data…”
That “lens” produced a striking lack of empathy and led to conclusions that pathologized the very men who had opened up to him in good faith.”
I think we can be very sure that MacMillan would not be published other than if he “applied a feminist epistemological lens”. Presumably the anti-feminist epistemological lens had gone missing. It is appalling that British taxpayers’ money – most of it from men – funds such bogus feminist “research”, but then of course ALL feminist “research” is bogus.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.