A post on Keir Starmer’s personal Facebook page. “Structural misogyny”, eh? He appears to be doing nothing on the structural misandry which is a hallmark of his miserable feminist-compliant administration.
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Justice for Men & Boys 
In a related BBC article today, the feminist sock-puppet said that his administration “didn’t offer enough hope in the first two years of government.”
For young men, it looks like hope will be a commodity in short supply for the remainder of Starmer’s wretched term in office. Harman’s brief is to “advise the PM on how to galvanise government to deliver for women & girls…working with women across Parliament to identify the action needed to tackle misogyny and deliver greater opportunity for women in parliamentary and public life.”
For the record, 46% of the Parliamentary Labour Party are women. (fact)
The 54% male contingent might as well be. (opinion)
Most have feminist leanings (fact). So where do we go from here? Double down for much more of the same, ignoring the problems which affect men, who are 72% of the taxpayer base.
It’s almost as though male problems don’t even register with our political masters, they simply expect us to suck it up. Will pay close attention to his ‘unveiling a new programme of legislation’ next week. Willing to bet there will be nothing in it for men other than the prospect of being banged up as a result of false allegation once juryless trials and Operation Soteria Bluestone are implemented.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/operation-soteria-year-one-report/operation-soteria-bluestone-year-one-report-accessible-version
Note the composition of the committee. Plethora of women, one man. And he’s a feminist (fact).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Keir Starmer and others like him are repeating the same script over and over. It’s getting boring.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Rob, but I think it’s the first time I’ve heard of “structural misogyny” haha! What a wonderful concept for women and girls who screw up their lives!
LikeLike
I suppose he’s clocked that females are increasingly “left leaning” and the Greens have benefitted from this and their very recent pandering to Muslim block voting. In a way he’s running out of cards because he and our elites simply refuse to engage with the biggest reason Reform are so popular and Labour and Conservatives got yet another mauling …. Mass immigration. The online BBC news coverage has an excellent and easy to use site on which one can select each and every borough, city, county that voted and see the results. When one knows them it becomes interesting to see the pattern of voting. Here ‘up north’ the most dramatic votes for Reform are in the still mainly white boroughs that border the “diverse” boroughs which show a more fragmented pattern (“independents” Greens and Reform advances all at once). The point being that these “white” boroughs have only recently been brought into the immigration debate by sudden rises in obvious immigration and ‘hotels’ and can see in the riven societies they neighbour what the future holds….. In a way the Gorton and Denton Parliamentary election illustrated this with Denton voting very differently than Gorton, the latter being “transformed” in less than a decade from a poor and forgotten working class suburb of Manchester into something like a middle eastern enclave. While Denton remains a faded working class town separated from Gorton by reservoirs and the M60.
Will trying to deflect attention to Patriarchy (structural misogyny) work? Somehow it seems unlikely. I expect the “new” term is used in an attempt to deflect attention from the fact that the most evident and unrepentant Patriarchal communities are those whose block votes Labour so relied upon in much of the “Red Wall”. I’m sure Hattie won’t be speeding up the “Grooming Gangs” Inquiry for instance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
When women see life through a lens of ‘structural misogyny’, they’re really seeing it through a lens of ressentiment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment
Then, they demand reparations for their own insecurities and weaknesses!!
LikeLiked by 1 person