An interesting piece on Inside Time, the national newspaper for prisoners and detainees. I’ve posted the following comments and would encourage followers of this blog to post their own comments.
“Ciara Bergman’s response is nonsense from beginning to end, as we’d expect of a feminist response on this or any other issue.
There are many men “languishing in prison” due to the anti-male bias of the CPS and courts with respect to consensual sexual activity between men and women.
We wish Dr Naughton success in his bid to persuade the feminist-compliant CPS to change its guidance. Long overdue. Barely a day goes by in which we don’t see cases reported of women being held unaccountable – or barely accountable – for their actions and/or inactions, often through the use of scandalous “suspended sentences”.
The only “rape myths” are those created by feminists. In his book “The Empathy Gap: Male Disadvantages and the Mechanisms of Their Neglect” William Collins estimates – using only official government data – that 77% of sexual assault allegations made to the police by women in the UK are false allegations.
Feminists don’t pursue equality, they pursue ever more outrageous female privilage. I have never heard of a feminist seeking equal punishments for male and female law-breakers. Nor a feminist campaigning against Male Genital Mutilation, or a host of other assaults on the human rights of men and boys.
JUSTICE FOR MEN & BOYS
CAMPAIGN FOR MERIT IN BUSINESS
LAUGHING AT FEMINISTS”
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Justice for Men & Boys 
I don’t see your comment. Deleted?
I left this, I wonder if it’ll stay:
‘”There’s no difference in how the law treats men or women when it comes to rape” That’s not correct, as defined under the law women cannot even commit rape.
“But rape isn’t a choice”
The point being made by Dr Naughton is that it’s possible that the women did in fact make a choice to have sex and under the influence of alcohol and therefore it’s not rape. It doesn’t become rape if she consented even if drunk.
“we believe you; you’re not alone and what happened was not your fault”
This is part of the problem. An accusation is just an accusation. It may be true, it may be a lie or it could be someone was drunk not remembering that they gave consent. It’s important that the authorities know this and act in a way that is impartial. That, it appears, is no longer the case.’
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yours has appeared now
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Dennis, good point. Maybe they never published my comments.
LikeLike
i commented and it hadn’t appeared. Mine was the fact that back in 2018/19 no less than three legal bodies estimated 25% of convictions in the previous 5 years were unsound due to the police and CPS concealing smartphone and social media from the court and therefore the defence. And that last year the Supreme Court said judges in Scotland had been denying defendants proper trials. All a matter of public record and from the Ministry of Justice, The Bar Associations off both Scotland and England, even the BBC! There must be, as a result, a considerable number of men in prison who are there due to these failings. All of these reports were about precisely the sorts of cases where there is agreement that sex occured and the case hinges on consent. Where the complainants descriptions of the event to friends in messages or on social media is very pertinent to the issue of consent. If the immediate response was that it was good or fun then clearly a Jury will be less convinced if much later it’s described as non consensual. In such cases drinking is often a feature.
LikeLiked by 1 person