Matt Goodwin: “5 key trends from my book that will completely reshape Britain.”

Interesting.

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

7 thoughts on “Matt Goodwin: “5 key trends from my book that will completely reshape Britain.”

  1. What irony, as the childless cat loving feminist white women slide into extinction, all the time the most overtly “patriarchal” ethnic group will be taking over! I wonder, as the bumptious Sarah the plumber deals with her new supporters in Gorton, she’ll start to notice that she deals with the male community leaders and the women stay in the background well covered. I suppose some think the process of affluence and secularism will infect other religions. But then I can’t think of any modern Islamic state however large and wealthy that has ditched it’s basic social mores with the rapidity of western nations. After all if any bothered to actually pay attention to the Gov. Surveys and research (including the actual government) they’d find most ethnic minorities are very socially conservative compared to the indigenous folk. Even the fount of all evil (to the bien pensant ) Andrew Tate has a membership base that is majority ethnic minorities! You’d think the identity police would have noticed he’s “black” and a Muslim, but I suppose that would spoil their fantasy.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. It’s shocking how the reviews for Matt’s work on Amazon are being manipulated downwards by the political left. Presently, there are 5 star reviews and sensible comments relating to the text from those with ‘verified purchase’ against their name. But the vast, vast majority are obviously coordinated 1 star reviews, all saying pretty much the same thing (accusations of racism and AI), with no evidence that these reviewers have even purchased the book. It’s suspiciously polarised…

    And, I didn’t believe that AI and racism could mix, in any case.

    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/27523543241277564

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Police issue major new update on result of investigation into claims of ‘family voting’ at Gorton and Denton by-election – Manchester Evening News Well no surprise here. Lets just say GMP’s credibility on such things is pretty low here. After all they ended investigations into the Grooming Gangs (as Maggie Oliver points out) in Rochdale and Oldham. Refused to even appear at Mayor Andy Burnham’s local inquiry into the issue let alone give evidence and continue to pretend there aren’t issues in Oldham (hence the exasperated Council requesting the Gov. do a national Enquiry). Burnham couldn’t order the Police to give evidence, despite being Police and Crime Commissioner for Greater Manchester, because apparently only the Home Office could instruct them.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. l do understand that many, maybe most , MRAs don’t think the Grooming Gangs scandal is a men’s rights issue. But I do think it is for the following reasons.

    a. Of the 20,000 victims according to MofJ figures a couple of years ago we know at least half were in the care of their local council. Basically casualties of the epidemic of family breakdown because they literally have no one to be their parent other than the Council. And of course must have been under 18 as care ends on the 18th Birthday. The communities that acted quickly to combat this Sikh and Hindu are of course the least likely to have family breakdown and most likely to have protective fathers in stable families

    b. All this was going on while the feminists were resolutely pressing ahead with ‘micro aggressions” and “rape culture” at Universities. Where the actual issue is two drunken over 18s have sex and later the female regrets it. Frequently because at the time she was supposedly going out with another guy. In pursuit of this the feminist lobby has manipulated the rules of evidence and now most egregiously trying to suspend the right to a Jury !

    c. Feminist hypocrisy. The very few feminist labour MPs and others who said anything about this were pounced on by the Labour “sisterhood” and cancelled. These days it is abundantly clear this is because many feminists actually rely on the Pakistani and Bangladeshi block vote (eg Jess Philips )and their principles mean nothing compared to keeping power. Amazingly I actually agree with Julie Bindel on this.

    d If one were to take out the huge numbers of prosecutions of such gangs in recent years and of prosecutions of immigrants committing sexual crimes. Given the small number of such trials (3000 each year with about 1500 convictions,) a remarkably small number for getting on for 70 million people actually dealing with this issue would show that sexual crimes in the indigenous population is incredibly small compared with any country one cares to name. I.e . There is no “epidemic”. Sweden, that heaven of feminism in fact has a much higher rate in proportion to its much smaller population for instance.

    e. Finally of course is a “feminist” point. That culture is important and the culture in Britain has in fact been very protective of women in a very different way to some others. With deeply ingrained ideas “never hit a girl or woman” “mind your language in front of women” “women and children first” our culture had never “condoned” violence against women nor seen “rape” as an organised vehicle of oppression. Injunctions not applied in other cultures (at least with regard to women and girls outside the tribe). In other words our culture takes particular care to protect females and does so at the expense of men quite often. Noe we have ‘imported” very different ideas the contrasts become more immediate.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to connoisseurpleasante5be27a06f Cancel reply