3 thoughts on “Free Speech Union weekly newsletter

  1. Two stories are indicative of the influences on “Government” both the elected one and the real gov. The civil service and quangos. Feminists in terms of the attempt to end jury trials. Having failed in Scotland the attempt to do so in Westminster is “covered” by claims of clearing a “backlog” as the incoming Chair of the CBA points out it would do little to clear a backlog. Which leaves the reason, to increase convictions because juries aren’t “trained”.

    While the battle over “islamophobia” reflects the Labour Party’s fears of losing the block vote many of their MPs relied on. A fear so great it even trumps their feminist position, as white girls (and boys) are just collateral damage in this.

    And yet another example of the feminist civil war as the long term push to claim actual biology has little to do with “gender” results in people choosing their “gender”, apparently this is only a problem if it’s biological men who take the feminists line and fine their “feminine’ side. I have yet to see anyone complaining about females who trans to “men”, even though they are the majority of those recieving “treatment”!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Good news World’s supply of Tippex cannot conceal the truth about to flood out of Scotland – Charlie Peters But bad news for Jess Phillips, the obfuscations and delays to kick the Westminster Inquiry down the road can’t go on forever as both GT. London and Scotland, till now supposedly strangely free of such gangs are starting to show cracks n this improbable absence. As Khan in London publishes Adverts about supposed “toxic masculinity” from young men something far more wicked has been covered up for decades. In the years feminists tried to persuade us Builders wolf whistles or unwanted compliments in a Bar were “rape culture” they covered up something actually “rape culture” because they relied on ethnic block votes. Jess and her ilk “protecting women”? Apparently if they were the wrong sort women, girls and boys, then not interested. I suppose its hard to connect “grooming gangs” to a need to have more female CEOs or Non Executive Board Members. Or to admit that the young people “groomed” were in state care or single/chaotic parent families, left so vulnerable by the absence of fathers and their instinct to protect. Few, if any, of the tens of thousands of victims came from stable traditional families and Hindu and Sikh communities took action to protect their young people. Its painfully slow but the cracks are coming one by one.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to nrjnigel Cancel reply