This latest video (13:57) from Richard The Fourth.
He says “The most obnoxious piece of writing he’s ever read.”
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Justice for Men & Boys 
Vice magazine article: ‘Mankeeping Is Why Women Are Done With Dating’.
The alternative title ‘Grown Child Keeping Is Why MGTOW WILL win.’
Veni….. Vide…..Vice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No doubt there was/will be a “where have all the good men gone?” piece in the same mag. from some 35 plus female whose suddenly realised that though she and her insincere female friends say she’s “a catch”, there are in fact no fishermen interested. And then they wonder why it is that women far outnumber men in the “walking worried” mental health “epidemic”. In reality women should be relieved that men are still willing to seek dates and put up with their neuroticism!
It is interesting the “neo Marxist” nature of this idea, that it is “unpaid” emotional “work”. Always there in feminism in the background it has come to the fore as it has become obvious that men in fact do more paid and unpaid work in western countries. And that as more men live on their own or do do housework the little actual work involved becomes obvious. Even the supposedly difficult tasks of remembering birthdays or arrange social events is a doddle with modern tech. And which sex is it that has to come up with “that perfect date” or the places to visit, or restaurants to try, troop along on shopping trips to lie about “does my bum look big in this?”, “is it too young for me” etc.
As the figures in the Vice article make very clear its not the men who’ve given up on dating and family formation. They’re just not finding equally committed women, unsurprising as the women the Vice piece describes are entirely selfish and unwilling to engage in a relationship unless “paid” for everything within it, not a partnership of human beings but a transaction between economic units.
Never even considering the huge demand for altruism from men to work and yet spend almost all the proceeds of paid work on other’s choices; their wife’s and their children’s. As well as their “unpaid work”. And having to forgo their hobbies in the comparatively little “spare” time they have. The vast majority of purchases made or confirmed by women in our consumer society, even though (as feminists point out) no where near earning the income that matches that consumption.
LikeLiked by 3 people
This just popped up. I’m a single mum of three – the two-child benefit cap makes me feel like a burden My first reaction was to think “because you are” given that welfare benefits are paid for out of taxes. But then I read it and realised the nonsense of the whole piece. It turns out the woman earns £45k, £8k more than the average family income in the UK. And so characteristically of our feminised age the whole piece is about “feelings” rather than the actuality of being dependent on benefits. On she drones “Nobody should have to justify their reproductive choices.” because of course somehow getting other people to pay for them is the responsible thing to do! Of course the well paid Ms. Jaffe probably does get some financial support from the father/s of her three children as well as the free childcare offered by the Gov.
The piece is a classic of desperation to avoid responsibility for one’s actions and obsession about how one “feels”. As a relatively high earner the “cap” in fact will have no practical effect unless she embarked on a few additional children or jacked in her job. Rather she wants the change because she’ll “feel” better about “the narrative”. And of course it illustrates the state of the “i” and the MSM’s remoteness from reality to put forward someone well above the average family income as “poor”.
LikeLiked by 3 people
And as if to prove the point this. My wife was so controlling – I’m glad we couldn’t have children Somehow I doubt this would be written about a “white” man. But that being said it is an almost text book example of the “feminist” woman that, once she has bagged her man, expects everything to go her way. “From the start, she had an unrealistic expectation that a man should – and would – provide. It was the opposite of feminism, really, although she called herself a feminist. I’d signed up to what I thought would be an equal partnership, which put huge pressure on me, even though I earn good money working in IT.” Materialistic she even blamed him for the Covid travel restrictions. “Initially, I offered her a lump sum as a settlement. She had a strong sense of entitlement and, looking back, she used the divorce system to bully me; to get what she could.” Of course she had a strong sense of entitlement! Understandably the man though still “dating” and wanting children has his guard up ” I have every guard possible up – and my ability to trust has gone out of the window.” Somehow a very common story for an man having experienced divorce.
LikeLiked by 3 people
This has been a problem for a time. The author Philip Wylie took a good look at American society in his 1943 book ‘Generation of Vipers’.
“American women are inculcated with a distorted version of a Cinderella fairy-tale that conditions them to expect material wealth, not because of virtuous activities, but merely because they are female. This has defeated husbands in America, making homes into centres of disillusionment. It long ago became associated with the notion that the bearing of children entitled women from respite from all other physical and social responsibility. The mealy look of men today is the result of ‘momism’, as is the pinched and baffled fury in the eye of womankind.’
In fact it has been a problem forever.
Isaiha 3:12 “As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them, causing them to err and stray from the way of your paths.”
LikeLiked by 2 people