Our thanks to cp for this.
He writes:
“I used to work, in STEM, for what was once Britain’s largest manufacturing company. I’m going to call it ECI.
ECI doesn’t exist any longer. There are a multitude of reasons. But featuring to the fore would be the behaviours of higher-ranking women in the workplace. Particularly if they feel that their ‘stellar’ careers may be threatened by the unavoidable fact that you might be more imaginative, driven, and well, just generally competent.
So – they go to work on you, in the shadows, in the background, behind closed doors. This is starting to be recognised, as in the link above.
This effect may be about to bite our leader 2TK on the bottom. All the ladies he has now upset…Louise Haigh…Sue Gray….Lucy Powell….Angela Rayner.
These little ‘briefings’ against him. No-one can quite identify the origins…
If anyone is interested in what went on in the dying days of ‘ECI’, take a look at Creating a Stink by Dan Murdoch (pseudonym, and not the ‘Trabant Trek’ guy). It’s 2,500 pages long, and, believe me, you can’t make this stuff up….
You end up working 24/7 trying to undo the damage, rather than actually working. One of the (many) reasons why women in the workplace hastens a low productivity economy.”
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Justice for Men & Boys 
German coalition government agrees new military service plan – DW – 11/13/2025 Of course the compulsory part is for men. Women can volunteer. But maybe there is wisdom, if not equality, in engineering mainly male armed forces. The results of the pathology could destroy units from within. Its interesting that it is the Scandinavian countries that have partially made female service compulsory. While even the left larger countries haven’t. Maybe the Scandinavians are principled, or maybe mindful of their very small populations compared to potential aggressors. But then again I can’t imagine much that would be more damaging to morale to have webs of female whispering campaigns within fighting services.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Most men are very good at cooperating with other men in order to accomplish a mission. It is founded on an unwritten principle that their word is their bond, and that the others can therefore rely upon them to fulfil any task which they have undertaken, no matter how unpleasant the barriers to its achievement. The word ‘duty’ is understood.
This breaks down with feminists, of either sex. They seem to operate on a principle of minimum reciprocity, taking as much as they can get away with (eg their salary), offering little or nothing in return. In the early days of the internet, have seen a woman who thought it acceptable to spend her entire day (for weeks on end) browsing the web making comparisons of wedding venues for her impending nuptials. Another (her supervisor) spent a similar time looking for another job while at work. The stress of being asked to fulfil their duties was getting to them. Of course, they made it stressful for everyone else, with endless accusations of bullying if there were suggestions that they should do something productive for their pay. They, and other women, seemed to believe that the work environment simply offered opportunities to expand their social network, with work being optional. Oh, and the amount of flirty, flattering manipulation of senior management that allowed them free passes to do as they pleased.
Feminist types didn’t work in the labs. They won’t work in the army. They won’t work anywhere.
They cannot grasp principles. They don’t understand duty. Its all me, me, me. They seem to believe that the end game is increasing their popularity (with the easily fooled) rather than the task which they’ve been set. So, they build exclusionary cliques, with rigidly enforced internal rules. They do not cooperate with the out-group, especially men whom they cannot manipulate.
And, amidst the chaos, things fall apart. Look at the flip-flopping we’ve seen from Reeves this week. Actually (and I never thought I’d hear myself say this) I almost feel sorry for her. She’s only a puppet. Have seen it all before, weak male feminist managers who surround themselves with women, promoting them way out of their league, so that he can use them to do what he wants, knowing that he can drop them in it, at any time, by withdrawing his support.
There is something very, very suspect in any man who identifies as a feminist. Their brain seems to operate in the same way as a woman.
It’s all about their popularity, no matter who suffers, even the entire country.
Yes, Starmer. I mean you.
LikeLike