Misogyny to be treated as extremism by UK government

Our thanks to cp for this. An extract:

“Ms Cooper said the strategy will “map and monitor extremist trends” to work out how to disrupt and divert people away from them.

It will also “identify any gaps in existing policy which need to be addressed to crack down on those pushing harmful and hateful beliefs and violence”, she said.”

[End of extract.]

As followers of this blog know very well, feminism is a set of “harmful and hateful beliefs and violence” [elective abortions being only the most obvious example of violence, and against the defenceless, at that.] So the government should “crack down” on feminists, starting with politicians such as Yvette Cooper, Jess Phillips…

—————————-

If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.

We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.

Our YouTube channel is here.

4 thoughts on “Misogyny to be treated as extremism by UK government

  1. Ironic the day after the Met. Police Chief complains his officers are distracted from real crime by ill thought out laws prohibiting “hate” in various loosely defined forms (in effect what someone “feels”). The outgoing Home Secretary (a notable success in office……) adds in “misogyny”, as far as I can see a definition, is anything a woman feels is “creepy” or just plain critical. I expect next year some hapless comedian will be arrested by Special Branch for old recordings of shows with mother in law jokes. Or builders “cat calling” will be swooped on by armed anti terrorist officers. Meanwhile of course actual crime will go unanswered.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. In another example of Einstein’s observation about doing the same thing and expecting a different result (madness defined) the current government has engaged a service company Serco to recruit to the armed services. And given them Diversity Targets. Diversity drive to recruit more women or ethnic troops threatens to humiliate Britain’s military and sideline white candidates, Shadow Defence Secretary warns | Daily Mail Online

    In a repeat of the previous contract that resulted in serious shortfalls in the strength of all services (specially the Army) and the RAF’s debacle when it was revealed to have been illegally pursuing direct discrimination against white men (having to pay out compensation), seriously short of pilots as a result and having to reverse the policy to actually make a dent in that shortfall. Capita having concentrated on the diversity targets rather than recruit in the traditional areas which have a tradition of joining HMs forces.

    So more of the fanciful advertising, discrimination against white young men , “tweaking” physical standards and whopping shortfalls in personnel as Serco effectively ignore the 80% of the male population who are too white for their diversity targets! Specially the working class white ones from towns and districts that have traditional links with the forces.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. The British government will need MEN more than even in the future as efforts to expunge Islam and Third-World immigrants rev up. If not English men will leave England and women will have to deal with sexual assaults from Islamic men by themselves. This constant misandry is beyond insane and sickening!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Isn’t it fascinating that so much of our politics at an official level is still in the post fall of the Soviet Union. Phase. “The end of history” a demoralised Russia, its empire fragmenting; a still impoverished China and still chaotic middle east and Afghanistan/Pakistan rent by divisions between Shia and Sunni and “modernist” pan Arabic socialists. The US triumphant and under its protection “the west” free to indulge itself in every kind of “affluenza” and become decadent.

      Few in the UK paid attention to the recent triumphal parades in China which is matching its economic clout with a truly vast military expansion, which is inevitably shadowed by a massive expansion from India, linked to Russia’s development of a “war” economy and reflected with other countries in the vastness that is Asia similarly beefing up their armed forces. I followed with interest the debates the Ukrainian parliament about their various proposals both for conscription and for re-construction. For in these they had to seriously consider where and for what “manpower” is and would be needed in a country at war and which would need a huge re-construction once peace happens. The interesting thing is that non of the many parties made much mention of women at all. They all were concerned to ensure they had enough men to fight and to re-construct. No DEI, no worry about Drag Queens, no multi-gender toilets, no arresting comedians etc. Just practical, often quite blunt, debates on how many young men are need to be available if the wheels of civilisation are to be kept turning.

      I note media gave some notice was paid to the return to the blunt name “War” for the former US Defense Department. But mainly reported in true Trump derangement syndrome fashion, as if some daffy evidence of Trump being a simpleton. Rather than a signal that “history” is back with a vengeance and the days of airy disregard for harsh realities are numbered. The “diversity targets” for Serco are just one example that this signal has still not been picked up by our politicians and civil servants. Another of course the lack of concerted effort around a Chinese owned Steel Company despite its strategic importance.

      Like

Leave a reply to nrjnigel Cancel reply