Yesterday we published Empowering the Innocent: Publication of the Law Commission’s ‘final piece of the rape review’ “. Our thanks to cp for these comments:
“In Scotland, a jurisprudence ‘guided’ by Lady Dorrian and Dorothy Bain KC, successfully eliminated the need for corroborating evidence…. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c977d35l7mjo
…and attempted to have rape trials decided by ‘trauma-informed’ judges, rather than jury. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540
These women aren’t interested in justice. They want judgement against men, and they want to be in charge of the process. It’s only a matter of time before this pervades the entire UK. Operation Soteria Bluestone is in full swing. https://www.npcc.police.uk/our-work/violence-against-women-and-girls/operation-soteria/
Sir Stephen House (who probably has some experience in such matters) was summarily dismissed from the ‘operation’ for daring to suggest that allegations of rape might not be all that they appear, and women might have ulterior motives for telling porkies. In doing so, he upset ‘Professor’ Betsy Stanko who is really running the show. In a model of professional behaviour, Professor Stanko dealt with this betrayal of the desired narrative by taking her grievances to Cathy Newman on Channel 4 News. As you do…. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-64815863
As far back as 2006, it was well known, from a range of meta studies, that false allegation of rape was probably around 11% minimum, and could be as high as 47%. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4509177 [J4MB: William Collins estimated in The Empathy Gap that 77% of rape allegations made to the police in the UK were false, drawing solely upon government statistics.]
Yet, despite this, in 2012, our then Director of Public Prosecutions, Keir Starmer, co-authors the Levitt Report, with Alison Levitt QC. This execrable document claims that men have little to worry about, as the rate of false accusation is 0.6%. In doing so, these lawyers have weaponised the failings of the DPP to tackle false accusation. The figure of 0.6% represents the percentage of women who will find themselves in the dock, facing charges of perjury, or wasting police time.
Starmer has always found it beneficial to his career to cow-tow to the feminist cause. Hasn’t he done well..? Now he is a mouthpiece to a feminist cabinet. King of reprehensible and poisonous Toads.
Here’s what men have to worry about from false accusation. Loss of employment. Loss of liberty. Suicide. Suicide of the mother of the falsely accused… http://empathygap.uk/Rape%20Case%20Histories%20modified%2017_8_20.pdf
Who, in the mid-20th Century would ever have predicted that Enlightenment values would be going backwards as the mid-21st Century approached? Yet, here we are. There must be an underlying reason for this…”
If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
Justice for Men & Boys 
In Scotland the Scottish equivalent of the Criminal Bar Association robustly came out against the idea of denying Rape/sexual assault defendants the basic right to a jury trial. While in England and Wales the Criminal Bar Association backed up whistle blowers (including even CPS Barristers) exposing the concealment of exculpatory evidence from smart phones and social media, which they estimated meant 25% of convictions in such cases were “unsound” (i.e. wrong). Following the latter the number of convictions fell by, you guessed it 25%. I doubt anybody would suggest either Bar Association was busily watching Andrew Tate videos to learn misogyny (the English one in fact led by a woman at the time) so it is clear that these are attacks on basic rights under the law, recognised by legal practitioners as well as the “manosphere”. In England and Wales this Parliament has attempted to legalise the concealment of such evidence that was revealed by the CBA by preventing the police from investigating the complainant’s smart phone under the supposed guise of “privacy”, needless to say the privacy of the defendant doesn’t come int it. I hope the CBAs in all the Countries of the UK continue to try to protect the most basic rights to “due process” and a fair trial. Its pretty clear the politicians won’t.
LikeLiked by 1 person