If you’d like email notifications of our new blog pieces, please enter your email address in the box near the top of the right-hand column and click ‘Subscribe’.
We shall shortly be posting this piece on our X channel.
Our YouTube channel is here.
- Comment
- Reblog
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Justice for Men & Boys 
“”Ms Rayner’s Anti-Muslim Hatred/Islamophobia Working Group secretly launched a “call for evidence” to help with a new definition. The call was issued only to a carefully selected collection of interested parties,”
To be fair to Ms Rayner this way of doing “consultations” is the norm in Government in general as well as the Houses of Parliament. For instance men’s organisations have to literally fight to get on any consultation list for Domestic Abuse, and they have to do it each time because their contact details always seem to get lost before the run up to another consultation. If anyone gets wind of any consultation, do circulate to as many as may be interested, never assume even publicly well known organisations or individuals have been invited.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Nigel, but the unvarying reality is that anything submitted by anti-feminists and other MRAs to these CONsultations is utterly ignored, even if given in oral sessions, as I discovered in 2012 after providing oral evidence to House of Commons and House of Lords inquiries about the then already well-established causal link between increasing gender diversity on boards and corporate financial decline:
It’s hardly surprising that MRAs are now highly disinclined to provide anything to CONsultations.
LikeLike